diff mbox

af_packet: use after free in prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired

Message ID 8f6c2fec-0ac4-1414-69da-462114a4481f@huawei.com
State RFC, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Ding Tianhong July 24, 2017, 1:09 a.m. UTC
On 2017/7/24 1:03, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 5:48 AM, liujian (CE) <liujian56@huawei.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I find it caused by below steps:
>> 1. set tp_version to TPACKET_V3 and req->tp_block_nr to 1
>> 2. set tp_block_nr to 0
>> Then pg_vec was freed, and we did not delete the timer?
> 
> Thanks for testing!
> 
> Ah, I overlook the initialization case in my previous patch.
> 
> How about the following one? Does it cover all the cases?
> 
> 
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index 008bb34ee324..0615c2a950fa 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -4329,7 +4329,7 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk,
> union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
>                 register_prot_hook(sk);
>         }
>         spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
> -       if (closing && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
> +       if (pg_vec && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
>                 /* Because we don't support block-based V3 on tx-ring */
>                 if (!tx_ring)
>                         prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(po, rb_queue);
> 
> .

Hi, Cong:

It looks like could not cover the case: req->tp_block_nr = 2 -> reg->tp_block_nr = 1 .

what about this way:

Comments

Ding Tianhong July 24, 2017, 1:28 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2017/7/24 9:09, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2017/7/24 1:03, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 5:48 AM, liujian (CE) <liujian56@huawei.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I find it caused by below steps:
>>> 1. set tp_version to TPACKET_V3 and req->tp_block_nr to 1
>>> 2. set tp_block_nr to 0
>>> Then pg_vec was freed, and we did not delete the timer?
>>
>> Thanks for testing!
>>
>> Ah, I overlook the initialization case in my previous patch.
>>
>> How about the following one? Does it cover all the cases?
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
>> index 008bb34ee324..0615c2a950fa 100644
>> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
>> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
>> @@ -4329,7 +4329,7 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk,
>> union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
>>                 register_prot_hook(sk);
>>         }
>>         spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
>> -       if (closing && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
>> +       if (pg_vec && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
>>                 /* Because we don't support block-based V3 on tx-ring */
>>                 if (!tx_ring)
>>                         prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(po, rb_queue);
>>
>> .
> 
> Hi, Cong:
> 
> It looks like could not cover the case: req->tp_block_nr = 2 -> reg->tp_block_nr = 1 .
> 

Oh, looks like this case would never happen, so I think your solution is ok.

> what about this way:
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -4331,13 +4331,17 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
>                 register_prot_hook(sk);
>         }
>         spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
> -       if (closing && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
> +       if ((closing || (pg_vec && !reg->tp_block_nr))&& (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
>                 /* Because we don't support block-based V3 on tx-ring */
>                 if (!tx_ring)
>                         prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(po, rb_queue);
> 
> 

>>
> 
> 
> .
>
Liu Jian July 24, 2017, 10:29 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Wang cong,

After apply the patch, I did not hit the issue again.
Thank you~


Best Regards,
liujian

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Dingtianhong

> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 9:29 AM

> To: Cong Wang; liujian (CE)

> Cc: Willem de Bruijn; Dave Jones; alexander.levin@verizon.com;

> davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; willemb@google.com;

> daniel@iogearbox.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Subject: Re: af_packet: use after free in prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired

> 

> 

> 

> On 2017/7/24 9:09, Ding Tianhong wrote:

> >

> >

> > On 2017/7/24 1:03, Cong Wang wrote:

> >> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 5:48 AM, liujian (CE) <liujian56@huawei.com> wrote:

> >>> Hi

> >>>

> >>> I find it caused by below steps:

> >>> 1. set tp_version to TPACKET_V3 and req->tp_block_nr to 1 2. set

> >>> tp_block_nr to 0 Then pg_vec was freed, and we did not delete the

> >>> timer?

> >>

> >> Thanks for testing!

> >>

> >> Ah, I overlook the initialization case in my previous patch.

> >>

> >> How about the following one? Does it cover all the cases?

> >>

> >>

> >> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c index

> >> 008bb34ee324..0615c2a950fa 100644

> >> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c

> >> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c

> >> @@ -4329,7 +4329,7 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk,

> >> union tpacket_req_u *req_u,

> >>                 register_prot_hook(sk);

> >>         }

> >>         spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);

> >> -       if (closing && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {

> >> +       if (pg_vec && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {

> >>                 /* Because we don't support block-based V3 on tx-ring

> */

> >>                 if (!tx_ring)

> >>                         prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(po,

> rb_queue);

> >>

> >> .

> >

> > Hi, Cong:

> >

> > It looks like could not cover the case: req->tp_block_nr = 2 ->

> reg->tp_block_nr = 1 .

> >

> 

> Oh, looks like this case would never happen, so I think your solution is ok.

> 

> > what about this way:

> > --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c

> > +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c

> > @@ -4331,13 +4331,17 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union

> tpacket_req_u *req_u,

> >                 register_prot_hook(sk);

> >         }

> >         spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);

> > -       if (closing && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {

> > +       if ((closing || (pg_vec && !reg->tp_block_nr))&&

> > + (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {

> >                 /* Because we don't support block-based V3 on tx-ring */

> >                 if (!tx_ring)

> >                         prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(po,

> rb_queue);

> >

> >

> 

> >>

> >

> >

> > .

> >
diff mbox

Patch

--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -4331,13 +4331,17 @@  static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
                register_prot_hook(sk);
        }
        spin_unlock(&po->bind_lock);
-       if (closing && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
+       if ((closing || (pg_vec && !reg->tp_block_nr))&& (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) {
                /* Because we don't support block-based V3 on tx-ring */
                if (!tx_ring)
                        prb_shutdown_retire_blk_timer(po, rb_queue);


>