diff mbox

[38/77] Move SCALAR_INT_MODE_P out of strict_volatile_bitfield_p

Message ID 87lgnshg7c.fsf@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Richard Sandiford July 13, 2017, 8:52 a.m. UTC 
strict_volatile_bitfield_p returns false for any mode that isn't
a scalar integer.  This patch moves the check to the caller and
makes strict_volatile_bitfield_p take the mode as a scalar_int_mode.
The handling of a true return can then also use the mode as a
scalar_int_mode.

2017-07-13  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
	    Alan Hayward  <alan.hayward@arm.com>
	    David Sherwood  <david.sherwood@arm.com>

gcc/
	* expmed.c (strict_volatile_bitfield_p): Change the type of fieldmode
	to scalar_int_mode.  Remove check for SCALAR_INT_MODE_P.
	(store_bit_field): Check is_a <scalar_int_mode> before calling
	strict_volatile_bitfield_p.
	(extract_bit_field): Likewise.

Comments

Jeff Law Aug. 15, 2017, 10:09 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 07/13/2017 02:52 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> strict_volatile_bitfield_p returns false for any mode that isn't
> a scalar integer.  This patch moves the check to the caller and
> makes strict_volatile_bitfield_p take the mode as a scalar_int_mode.
> The handling of a true return can then also use the mode as a
> scalar_int_mode.
> 
> 2017-07-13  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
> 	    Alan Hayward  <alan.hayward@arm.com>
> 	    David Sherwood  <david.sherwood@arm.com>
> 
> gcc/
> 	* expmed.c (strict_volatile_bitfield_p): Change the type of fieldmode
> 	to scalar_int_mode.  Remove check for SCALAR_INT_MODE_P.
> 	(store_bit_field): Check is_a <scalar_int_mode> before calling
> 	strict_volatile_bitfield_p.
> 	(extract_bit_field): Likewise.
OK.
jeff
diff mbox

Patch

Index: gcc/expmed.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/expmed.c	2017-07-13 09:18:40.784633351 +0100
+++ gcc/expmed.c	2017-07-13 09:18:41.241595261 +0100
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@  lowpart_bit_field_p (unsigned HOST_WIDE_
 static bool
 strict_volatile_bitfield_p (rtx op0, unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bitsize,
 			    unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bitnum,
-			    machine_mode fieldmode,
+			    scalar_int_mode fieldmode,
 			    unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bitregion_start,
 			    unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT bitregion_end)
 {
@@ -527,11 +527,6 @@  strict_volatile_bitfield_p (rtx op0, uns
       || flag_strict_volatile_bitfields <= 0)
     return false;
 
-  /* Non-integral modes likely only happen with packed structures.
-     Punt.  */
-  if (!SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (fieldmode))
-    return false;
-
   /* The bit size must not be larger than the field mode, and
      the field mode must not be larger than a word.  */
   if (bitsize > modesize || modesize > BITS_PER_WORD)
@@ -1056,19 +1051,21 @@  store_bit_field (rtx str_rtx, unsigned H
 		 rtx value, bool reverse)
 {
   /* Handle -fstrict-volatile-bitfields in the cases where it applies.  */
-  if (strict_volatile_bitfield_p (str_rtx, bitsize, bitnum, fieldmode,
-				  bitregion_start, bitregion_end))
+  scalar_int_mode int_mode;
+  if (is_a <scalar_int_mode> (fieldmode, &int_mode)
+      && strict_volatile_bitfield_p (str_rtx, bitsize, bitnum, int_mode,
+				     bitregion_start, bitregion_end))
     {
       /* Storing of a full word can be done with a simple store.
 	 We know here that the field can be accessed with one single
 	 instruction.  For targets that support unaligned memory,
 	 an unaligned access may be necessary.  */
-      if (bitsize == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (fieldmode))
+      if (bitsize == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (int_mode))
 	{
-	  str_rtx = adjust_bitfield_address (str_rtx, fieldmode,
+	  str_rtx = adjust_bitfield_address (str_rtx, int_mode,
 					     bitnum / BITS_PER_UNIT);
 	  if (reverse)
-	    value = flip_storage_order (fieldmode, value);
+	    value = flip_storage_order (int_mode, value);
 	  gcc_assert (bitnum % BITS_PER_UNIT == 0);
 	  emit_move_insn (str_rtx, value);
 	}
@@ -1076,12 +1073,12 @@  store_bit_field (rtx str_rtx, unsigned H
 	{
 	  rtx temp;
 
-	  str_rtx = narrow_bit_field_mem (str_rtx, fieldmode, bitsize, bitnum,
+	  str_rtx = narrow_bit_field_mem (str_rtx, int_mode, bitsize, bitnum,
 					  &bitnum);
-	  gcc_assert (bitnum + bitsize <= GET_MODE_BITSIZE (fieldmode));
+	  gcc_assert (bitnum + bitsize <= GET_MODE_BITSIZE (int_mode));
 	  temp = copy_to_reg (str_rtx);
 	  if (!store_bit_field_1 (temp, bitsize, bitnum, 0, 0,
-				  fieldmode, value, reverse, true))
+				  int_mode, value, reverse, true))
 	    gcc_unreachable ();
 
 	  emit_move_insn (str_rtx, temp);
@@ -1899,25 +1896,27 @@  extract_bit_field (rtx str_rtx, unsigned
   else
     mode1 = tmode;
 
-  if (strict_volatile_bitfield_p (str_rtx, bitsize, bitnum, mode1, 0, 0))
+  scalar_int_mode int_mode;
+  if (is_a <scalar_int_mode> (mode1, &int_mode)
+      && strict_volatile_bitfield_p (str_rtx, bitsize, bitnum, int_mode, 0, 0))
     {
-      /* Extraction of a full MODE1 value can be done with a simple load.
+      /* Extraction of a full INT_MODE value can be done with a simple load.
 	 We know here that the field can be accessed with one single
 	 instruction.  For targets that support unaligned memory,
 	 an unaligned access may be necessary.  */
-      if (bitsize == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode1))
+      if (bitsize == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (int_mode))
 	{
-	  rtx result = adjust_bitfield_address (str_rtx, mode1,
+	  rtx result = adjust_bitfield_address (str_rtx, int_mode,
 						bitnum / BITS_PER_UNIT);
 	  if (reverse)
-	    result = flip_storage_order (mode1, result);
+	    result = flip_storage_order (int_mode, result);
 	  gcc_assert (bitnum % BITS_PER_UNIT == 0);
 	  return convert_extracted_bit_field (result, mode, tmode, unsignedp);
 	}
 
-      str_rtx = narrow_bit_field_mem (str_rtx, mode1, bitsize, bitnum,
+      str_rtx = narrow_bit_field_mem (str_rtx, int_mode, bitsize, bitnum,
 				      &bitnum);
-      gcc_assert (bitnum + bitsize <= GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode1));
+      gcc_assert (bitnum + bitsize <= GET_MODE_BITSIZE (int_mode));
       str_rtx = copy_to_reg (str_rtx);
     }