diff mbox

test-i386: Make x86 test program compile on clang

Message ID D5741445-7EFD-4AF1-8DB2-E4AFA93CBB1A@icloud.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Theodore Dubois July 10, 2017, 8:57 p.m. UTC
Clang's assembler is slightly incompatible with GCC's assembler, which
caused the program to not compile on Clang for these reasons:

  - The "q" constraint was specified for an argument to the set
    instruction, which didn't work because Clang chose the esi register,
    which has no 8-bit form on i386.
  - Clang doesn't support size suffixes on the loop instructions.
  - Clang requires a size suffix on the fist instruction.
  - Clang doesn't support specifying segment prefixes before the
    instruction, and requires specifying them on the address.
  - The arguments to the bound instruction are in the wrong order on
    Clang. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27653

Signed-off-by: Theodore Dubois <tblodt@icloud.com>
---
 tests/tcg/test-i386.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Paolo Bonzini July 10, 2017, 9:48 p.m. UTC | #1
On 10/07/2017 22:57, Theodore Dubois wrote:
>   - Clang doesn't support size suffixes on the loop instructions.

Has this bug been reported?

Paolo
Theodore Dubois July 10, 2017, 10:13 p.m. UTC | #2
I don’t believe so, I haven’t been able to find it in the bug database.

~Theodore

> On Jul 10, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 10/07/2017 22:57, Theodore Dubois wrote:
>>  - Clang doesn't support size suffixes on the loop instructions.
> 
> Has this bug been reported?
> 
> Paolo
>
Paolo Bonzini July 11, 2017, 8:02 a.m. UTC | #3
On 11/07/2017 00:13, Theodore Dubois wrote:
> I don’t believe so, I haven’t been able to find it in the bug database.

This is now https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33741.

Paolo

> ~Theodore
> 
>> On Jul 10, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/07/2017 22:57, Theodore Dubois wrote:
>>>  - Clang doesn't support size suffixes on the loop instructions.
>>
>> Has this bug been reported?
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>
Theodore Dubois July 15, 2017, 3:35 a.m. UTC | #4
ping http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/786393/

~Theodore

> On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:57 PM, Theodore Dubois <tblodt@icloud.com> wrote:
> 
> Clang's assembler is slightly incompatible with GCC's assembler, which
> caused the program to not compile on Clang for these reasons:
> 
>  - The "q" constraint was specified for an argument to the set
>    instruction, which didn't work because Clang chose the esi register,
>    which has no 8-bit form on i386.
>  - Clang doesn't support size suffixes on the loop instructions.
>  - Clang requires a size suffix on the fist instruction.
>  - Clang doesn't support specifying segment prefixes before the
>    instruction, and requires specifying them on the address.
>  - The arguments to the bound instruction are in the wrong order on
>    Clang. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27653
> 
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Dubois <tblodt@icloud.com>
> ---
> tests/tcg/test-i386.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/tcg/test-i386.c b/tests/tcg/test-i386.c
> index 0f7b943b0c..dcb8e4876e 100644
> --- a/tests/tcg/test-i386.c
> +++ b/tests/tcg/test-i386.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void test_lea(void)
>     asm("movl $0, %0\n\t"\
>         "cmpl %2, %1\n\t"\
>         "set" JCC " %b0\n\t"\
> -        : "=r" (res)\
> +        : "=q" (res)\
>         : "r" (v1), "r" (v2));\
>     printf("%-10s %d\n", "set" JCC, res);\
>  if (TEST_CMOV) {\
> @@ -491,15 +491,23 @@ void test_loop(void)
> 
> #if !defined(__x86_64__)
>     TEST_LOOP("jcxz");
> +#if !defined(__clang__)
>     TEST_LOOP("loopw");
>     TEST_LOOP("loopzw");
>     TEST_LOOP("loopnzw");
> #endif
> +#endif
> 
>     TEST_LOOP("jecxz");
> +#if !defined(__clang__)
>     TEST_LOOP("loopl");
>     TEST_LOOP("loopzl");
>     TEST_LOOP("loopnzl");
> +#else
> +    TEST_LOOP("loop");
> +    TEST_LOOP("loopz");
> +    TEST_LOOP("loopnz");
> +#endif
> }
> 
> #undef CC_MASK
> @@ -867,7 +875,7 @@ void test_fcvt(double a)
>         uint16_t val16;
>         val16 = (fpuc & ~0x0c00) | (i << 10);
>         asm volatile ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (val16));
> -        asm volatile ("fist %0" : "=m" (wa) : "t" (a));
> +        asm volatile ("fists %0" : "=m" (wa) : "t" (a));
>         asm volatile ("fistl %0" : "=m" (ia) : "t" (a));
>         asm volatile ("fistpll %0" : "=m" (lla) : "t" (a) : "st");
>         asm volatile ("frndint ; fstl %0" : "=m" (ra) : "t" (a));
> @@ -1318,12 +1326,12 @@ void test_segs(void)
>     seg_data1[1] = 0xaa;
>     seg_data2[1] = 0x55;
> 
> -    asm volatile ("fs movzbl 0x1, %0" : "=r" (res));
> +    asm volatile ("movzbl %%fs:0x1, %0" : "=r" (res));
>     printf("FS[1] = %02x\n", res);
> 
>     asm volatile ("pushl %%gs\n"
>                   "movl %1, %%gs\n"
> -                  "gs movzbl 0x1, %0\n"
> +                  "movzbl %%gs:0x1, %0\n"
>                   "popl %%gs\n"
>                   : "=r" (res)
>                   : "r" (MK_SEL(2)));
> @@ -1764,7 +1772,11 @@ void test_exceptions(void)
>         /* bound exception */
>         tab[0] = 1;
>         tab[1] = 10;
> +#if defined(__clang__)
> +        asm volatile ("bound %1, %0" : : "r" (11), "m" (tab[0]));
> +#else
>         asm volatile ("bound %0, %1" : : "r" (11), "m" (tab[0]));
> +#endif
>     }
> #endif
> 
> -- 
> 2.13.2
> 
> 
> 
> ~Theodore
> 
>
Alex Bennée Oct. 9, 2018, 11:21 a.m. UTC | #5
Theodore Dubois <tblodt@icloud.com> writes:

> ping http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/786393/

Applied to tct-tests/next with another patch to work around enterq.
Sorry for the delay.

>
> ~Theodore
>
>> On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:57 PM, Theodore Dubois <tblodt@icloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> Clang's assembler is slightly incompatible with GCC's assembler, which
>> caused the program to not compile on Clang for these reasons:
>>
>>  - The "q" constraint was specified for an argument to the set
>>    instruction, which didn't work because Clang chose the esi register,
>>    which has no 8-bit form on i386.
>>  - Clang doesn't support size suffixes on the loop instructions.
>>  - Clang requires a size suffix on the fist instruction.
>>  - Clang doesn't support specifying segment prefixes before the
>>    instruction, and requires specifying them on the address.
>>  - The arguments to the bound instruction are in the wrong order on
>>    Clang. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27653
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Theodore Dubois <tblodt@icloud.com>
>> ---
>> tests/tcg/test-i386.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/test-i386.c b/tests/tcg/test-i386.c
>> index 0f7b943b0c..dcb8e4876e 100644
>> --- a/tests/tcg/test-i386.c
>> +++ b/tests/tcg/test-i386.c
>> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void test_lea(void)
>>     asm("movl $0, %0\n\t"\
>>         "cmpl %2, %1\n\t"\
>>         "set" JCC " %b0\n\t"\
>> -        : "=r" (res)\
>> +        : "=q" (res)\
>>         : "r" (v1), "r" (v2));\
>>     printf("%-10s %d\n", "set" JCC, res);\
>>  if (TEST_CMOV) {\
>> @@ -491,15 +491,23 @@ void test_loop(void)
>>
>> #if !defined(__x86_64__)
>>     TEST_LOOP("jcxz");
>> +#if !defined(__clang__)
>>     TEST_LOOP("loopw");
>>     TEST_LOOP("loopzw");
>>     TEST_LOOP("loopnzw");
>> #endif
>> +#endif
>>
>>     TEST_LOOP("jecxz");
>> +#if !defined(__clang__)
>>     TEST_LOOP("loopl");
>>     TEST_LOOP("loopzl");
>>     TEST_LOOP("loopnzl");
>> +#else
>> +    TEST_LOOP("loop");
>> +    TEST_LOOP("loopz");
>> +    TEST_LOOP("loopnz");
>> +#endif
>> }
>>
>> #undef CC_MASK
>> @@ -867,7 +875,7 @@ void test_fcvt(double a)
>>         uint16_t val16;
>>         val16 = (fpuc & ~0x0c00) | (i << 10);
>>         asm volatile ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (val16));
>> -        asm volatile ("fist %0" : "=m" (wa) : "t" (a));
>> +        asm volatile ("fists %0" : "=m" (wa) : "t" (a));
>>         asm volatile ("fistl %0" : "=m" (ia) : "t" (a));
>>         asm volatile ("fistpll %0" : "=m" (lla) : "t" (a) : "st");
>>         asm volatile ("frndint ; fstl %0" : "=m" (ra) : "t" (a));
>> @@ -1318,12 +1326,12 @@ void test_segs(void)
>>     seg_data1[1] = 0xaa;
>>     seg_data2[1] = 0x55;
>>
>> -    asm volatile ("fs movzbl 0x1, %0" : "=r" (res));
>> +    asm volatile ("movzbl %%fs:0x1, %0" : "=r" (res));
>>     printf("FS[1] = %02x\n", res);
>>
>>     asm volatile ("pushl %%gs\n"
>>                   "movl %1, %%gs\n"
>> -                  "gs movzbl 0x1, %0\n"
>> +                  "movzbl %%gs:0x1, %0\n"
>>                   "popl %%gs\n"
>>                   : "=r" (res)
>>                   : "r" (MK_SEL(2)));
>> @@ -1764,7 +1772,11 @@ void test_exceptions(void)
>>         /* bound exception */
>>         tab[0] = 1;
>>         tab[1] = 10;
>> +#if defined(__clang__)
>> +        asm volatile ("bound %1, %0" : : "r" (11), "m" (tab[0]));
>> +#else
>>         asm volatile ("bound %0, %1" : : "r" (11), "m" (tab[0]));
>> +#endif
>>     }
>> #endif
>>
>> --
>> 2.13.2
>>
>>
>>
>> ~Theodore
>>
>>


--
Alex Bennée
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/tests/tcg/test-i386.c b/tests/tcg/test-i386.c
index 0f7b943b0c..dcb8e4876e 100644
--- a/tests/tcg/test-i386.c
+++ b/tests/tcg/test-i386.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@  void test_lea(void)
     asm("movl $0, %0\n\t"\
         "cmpl %2, %1\n\t"\
         "set" JCC " %b0\n\t"\
-        : "=r" (res)\
+        : "=q" (res)\
         : "r" (v1), "r" (v2));\
     printf("%-10s %d\n", "set" JCC, res);\
  if (TEST_CMOV) {\
@@ -491,15 +491,23 @@  void test_loop(void)
 
 #if !defined(__x86_64__)
     TEST_LOOP("jcxz");
+#if !defined(__clang__)
     TEST_LOOP("loopw");
     TEST_LOOP("loopzw");
     TEST_LOOP("loopnzw");
 #endif
+#endif
 
     TEST_LOOP("jecxz");
+#if !defined(__clang__)
     TEST_LOOP("loopl");
     TEST_LOOP("loopzl");
     TEST_LOOP("loopnzl");
+#else
+    TEST_LOOP("loop");
+    TEST_LOOP("loopz");
+    TEST_LOOP("loopnz");
+#endif
 }
 
 #undef CC_MASK
@@ -867,7 +875,7 @@  void test_fcvt(double a)
         uint16_t val16;
         val16 = (fpuc & ~0x0c00) | (i << 10);
         asm volatile ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (val16));
-        asm volatile ("fist %0" : "=m" (wa) : "t" (a));
+        asm volatile ("fists %0" : "=m" (wa) : "t" (a));
         asm volatile ("fistl %0" : "=m" (ia) : "t" (a));
         asm volatile ("fistpll %0" : "=m" (lla) : "t" (a) : "st");
         asm volatile ("frndint ; fstl %0" : "=m" (ra) : "t" (a));
@@ -1318,12 +1326,12 @@  void test_segs(void)
     seg_data1[1] = 0xaa;
     seg_data2[1] = 0x55;
 
-    asm volatile ("fs movzbl 0x1, %0" : "=r" (res));
+    asm volatile ("movzbl %%fs:0x1, %0" : "=r" (res));
     printf("FS[1] = %02x\n", res);
 
     asm volatile ("pushl %%gs\n"
                   "movl %1, %%gs\n"
-                  "gs movzbl 0x1, %0\n"
+                  "movzbl %%gs:0x1, %0\n"
                   "popl %%gs\n"
                   : "=r" (res)
                   : "r" (MK_SEL(2)));
@@ -1764,7 +1772,11 @@  void test_exceptions(void)
         /* bound exception */
         tab[0] = 1;
         tab[1] = 10;
+#if defined(__clang__)
+        asm volatile ("bound %1, %0" : : "r" (11), "m" (tab[0]));
+#else
         asm volatile ("bound %0, %1" : : "r" (11), "m" (tab[0]));
+#endif
     }
 #endif