| Message ID | 20170706143503.21888-5-joel@jms.id.au |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 07/06/2017 09:35 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: > The hub node was not being probed as it had malformed address-cells and > size-cells nodes. > > This fixes probing of i2c devices on the first (non-hub) P9 socket. I can't replicate the problem you were having with the original or my modified device tree. All FSI devices are probing fine for me. I don't think we should merge this. Thanks, Eddie > > Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi > index 669ed6804f74..16802933558e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi > @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ > &fsi { > cfam@0,0 { > reg = <0 0>; > - #address-cells = <1>; > - #size-cells = <1>; > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > > i2c@1800 { > compatible = "ibm,fsi-i2c-master";
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi index 669ed6804f74..16802933558e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ &fsi { cfam@0,0 { reg = <0 0>; - #address-cells = <1>; - #size-cells = <1>; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <0>; i2c@1800 { compatible = "ibm,fsi-i2c-master";
The hub node was not being probed as it had malformed address-cells and size-cells nodes. This fixes probing of i2c devices on the first (non-hub) P9 socket. Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/ibm-power9-cfam.dtsi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)