Message ID | 20170704215129.4047623-1-brakmo@fb.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
On 07/04/2017 11:51 PM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote: > The function load_bpf_file ignores the return value of > load_and_attach(), so even if load_and_attach() returns an error, > load_bpf_file() will return 0. > > Now, load_bpf_file() can call load_and_attach() multiple times and some > can succeed and some could fail. I think the correct behavor is to > return error on the first failed load_and_attach(). Your SOB is missing.
On 7/4/17, 3:14 PM, "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote: On 07/04/2017 11:51 PM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote: > The function load_bpf_file ignores the return value of > load_and_attach(), so even if load_and_attach() returns an error, > load_bpf_file() will return 0. > > Now, load_bpf_file() can call load_and_attach() multiple times and some > can succeed and some could fail. I think the correct behavor is to > return error on the first failed load_and_attach(). Your SOB is missing. Oops, thanks. New patch forthcoming.
diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c index a4be7cf..899f403 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c @@ -567,8 +567,12 @@ static int do_load_bpf_file(const char *path, fixup_map_cb fixup_map) memcmp(shname, "perf_event", 10) == 0 || memcmp(shname, "socket", 6) == 0 || memcmp(shname, "cgroup/", 7) == 0 || - memcmp(shname, "sockops", 7) == 0) - load_and_attach(shname, data->d_buf, data->d_size); + memcmp(shname, "sockops", 7) == 0) { + ret = load_and_attach(shname, data->d_buf, + data->d_size); + if (ret != 0) + goto done; + } } ret = 0;