diff mbox

[testsuite] Add dg-require-stack-check

Message ID CAKdteOYe2Na_5NPrgc8+5Yr-n1j=F+wPqpRNUsm7ei+jpdy6FQ@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Christophe Lyon July 4, 2017, 8:50 a.m. UTC
On 3 July 2017 at 17:30, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/2017 09:00 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a follow-up to
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01791.html
>>
>> This patch adds dg-require-stack-check and updates the tests that use
>> dg-options "-fstack-check" to avoid failures on configurations that to
>> not support it.
>>
>> I merely copied what we currently do to check if visibility flags are
>> supported, and cross-tested on aarch64 and arm targets with the
>> results I expected.
>>
>> This means that my testing does not cover the changes I propose for
>> i386 and gnat.
>>
>> Is it OK nonetheless?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>>
>> stack-check-et.chlog.txt
>>
>>
>> 2017-07-03  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
>>
>>       * lib/target-supports-dg.exp (dg-require-stack-check): New.
>>       * lib/target-supports.exp (check_stack_check_available): New.
>>       * g++.dg/other/i386-9.C: Add dg-require-stack-check.
>>       * gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.dg/pr47443.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.dg/pr48134.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.dg/pr70017.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c: Likewise.
>>       * gnat.dg/opt49.adb: Likewise.
>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb: Likewise.
>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb: Likewise.
>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb: Likewise.
> ACK once you address Rainer's comments.  I've got further stack-check
> tests in the queue which I'll update once your change goes in.
>
> jeff

Here is an updated version, which adds documentation for dg-require-stack-check.

I also ran make-check on and x86_64 with ada enabled and checked the logs:
the updated i386/* and gnat.dg* tests all pass, and are preceded by
the compilation
of the "stack_check" sample.

OK?

Thanks,

Christophe
2017-07-04  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>

	gcc/
	* doc/sourcebuild.texi (Test Directives, Variants of
	dg-require-support): Add documentation for dg-require-stack-check.

	gcc/testsuite/
	* lib/target-supports-dg.exp (dg-require-stack-check): New.
	* lib/target-supports.exp (check_stack_check_available): New.
	* g++.dg/other/i386-9.C: Add dg-require-stack-check.
	* gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/pr47443.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/pr48134.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/pr70017.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c: Likewise.
	* gnat.dg/opt49.adb: Likewise.
	* gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb: Likewise.
	* gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb: Likewise.
	* gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb: Likewise.

Comments

Christophe Lyon July 5, 2017, 9:21 p.m. UTC | #1
On 4 July 2017 at 10:50, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 3 July 2017 at 17:30, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/03/2017 09:00 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a follow-up to
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01791.html
>>>
>>> This patch adds dg-require-stack-check and updates the tests that use
>>> dg-options "-fstack-check" to avoid failures on configurations that to
>>> not support it.
>>>
>>> I merely copied what we currently do to check if visibility flags are
>>> supported, and cross-tested on aarch64 and arm targets with the
>>> results I expected.
>>>
>>> This means that my testing does not cover the changes I propose for
>>> i386 and gnat.
>>>
>>> Is it OK nonetheless?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Christophe
>>>
>>>
>>> stack-check-et.chlog.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-07-03  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
>>>
>>>       * lib/target-supports-dg.exp (dg-require-stack-check): New.
>>>       * lib/target-supports.exp (check_stack_check_available): New.
>>>       * g++.dg/other/i386-9.C: Add dg-require-stack-check.
>>>       * gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.dg/pr47443.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.dg/pr48134.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.dg/pr70017.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gnat.dg/opt49.adb: Likewise.
>>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb: Likewise.
>>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb: Likewise.
>>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb: Likewise.
>> ACK once you address Rainer's comments.  I've got further stack-check
>> tests in the queue which I'll update once your change goes in.
>>
>> jeff
>
> Here is an updated version, which adds documentation for dg-require-stack-check.
>
> I also ran make-check on and x86_64 with ada enabled and checked the logs:
> the updated i386/* and gnat.dg* tests all pass, and are preceded by
> the compilation
> of the "stack_check" sample.
>
> OK?

Jeff, let me know if/when you want me to commit this?

Thanks,

Christophe

>
> Thanks,
>
> Christophe
Jeff Law July 6, 2017, 4:50 a.m. UTC | #2
On 07/04/2017 02:50 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 3 July 2017 at 17:30, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/03/2017 09:00 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a follow-up to
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01791.html
>>>
>>> This patch adds dg-require-stack-check and updates the tests that use
>>> dg-options "-fstack-check" to avoid failures on configurations that to
>>> not support it.
>>>
>>> I merely copied what we currently do to check if visibility flags are
>>> supported, and cross-tested on aarch64 and arm targets with the
>>> results I expected.
>>>
>>> This means that my testing does not cover the changes I propose for
>>> i386 and gnat.
>>>
>>> Is it OK nonetheless?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Christophe
>>>
>>>
>>> stack-check-et.chlog.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-07-03  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
>>>
>>>       * lib/target-supports-dg.exp (dg-require-stack-check): New.
>>>       * lib/target-supports.exp (check_stack_check_available): New.
>>>       * g++.dg/other/i386-9.C: Add dg-require-stack-check.
>>>       * gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.dg/pr47443.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.dg/pr48134.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.dg/pr70017.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c: Likewise.
>>>       * gnat.dg/opt49.adb: Likewise.
>>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb: Likewise.
>>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb: Likewise.
>>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb: Likewise.
>> ACK once you address Rainer's comments.  I've got further stack-check
>> tests in the queue which I'll update once your change goes in.
>>
>> jeff
> Here is an updated version, which adds documentation for dg-require-stack-check.
> 
> I also ran make-check on and x86_64 with ada enabled and checked the logs:
> the updated i386/* and gnat.dg* tests all pass, and are preceded by
> the compilation
> of the "stack_check" sample.
> 
> OK?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Christophe
> 
> 
> stack-check-et.chlog.txt
> 
> 
> 2017-07-04  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> 
> 	gcc/
> 	* doc/sourcebuild.texi (Test Directives, Variants of
> 	dg-require-support): Add documentation for dg-require-stack-check.
> 
> 	gcc/testsuite/
> 	* lib/target-supports-dg.exp (dg-require-stack-check): New.
> 	* lib/target-supports.exp (check_stack_check_available): New.
> 	* g++.dg/other/i386-9.C: Add dg-require-stack-check.
> 	* gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/pr47443.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/pr48134.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/pr70017.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c: Likewise.
> 	* gnat.dg/opt49.adb: Likewise.
> 	* gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb: Likewise.
> 	* gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb: Likewise.
> 	* gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb: Likewise.
OK for the trunk.  Thanks for doing this!

Jeff
Christophe Lyon July 10, 2017, 8:01 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi,


On 6 July 2017 at 06:50, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/04/2017 02:50 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On 3 July 2017 at 17:30, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/03/2017 09:00 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This is a follow-up to
>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01791.html
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds dg-require-stack-check and updates the tests that use
>>>> dg-options "-fstack-check" to avoid failures on configurations that to
>>>> not support it.
>>>>
>>>> I merely copied what we currently do to check if visibility flags are
>>>> supported, and cross-tested on aarch64 and arm targets with the
>>>> results I expected.
>>>>
>>>> This means that my testing does not cover the changes I propose for
>>>> i386 and gnat.
>>>>
>>>> Is it OK nonetheless?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Christophe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> stack-check-et.chlog.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-07-03  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
>>>>
>>>>       * lib/target-supports-dg.exp (dg-require-stack-check): New.
>>>>       * lib/target-supports.exp (check_stack_check_available): New.
>>>>       * g++.dg/other/i386-9.C: Add dg-require-stack-check.
>>>>       * gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.dg/pr47443.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.dg/pr48134.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.dg/pr70017.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c: Likewise.
>>>>       * gnat.dg/opt49.adb: Likewise.
>>>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb: Likewise.
>>>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb: Likewise.
>>>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb: Likewise.
>>> ACK once you address Rainer's comments.  I've got further stack-check
>>> tests in the queue which I'll update once your change goes in.
>>>
>>> jeff
>> Here is an updated version, which adds documentation for dg-require-stack-check.
>>
>> I also ran make-check on and x86_64 with ada enabled and checked the logs:
>> the updated i386/* and gnat.dg* tests all pass, and are preceded by
>> the compilation
>> of the "stack_check" sample.
>>
>> OK?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>>
>> stack-check-et.chlog.txt
>>
>>
>> 2017-07-04  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
>>
>>       gcc/
>>       * doc/sourcebuild.texi (Test Directives, Variants of
>>       dg-require-support): Add documentation for dg-require-stack-check.
>>
>>       gcc/testsuite/
>>       * lib/target-supports-dg.exp (dg-require-stack-check): New.
>>       * lib/target-supports.exp (check_stack_check_available): New.
>>       * g++.dg/other/i386-9.C: Add dg-require-stack-check.
>>       * gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.dg/pr47443.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.dg/pr48134.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.dg/pr70017.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c: Likewise.
>>       * gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c: Likewise.
>>       * gnat.dg/opt49.adb: Likewise.
>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb: Likewise.
>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb: Likewise.
>>       * gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb: Likewise.
> OK for the trunk.  Thanks for doing this!
>

I've committed this as r250013.

Since then, I've noticed that pr48134 randomly fails.

According to gcc.log, this seems related the order wrt pr47443.
pr48134 uses -fstack-check=specific, while pr47443 uses -fstack-check=generic.

When pr47443 appears before pr48134 in gcc.log, the latter fails,
otherwise it is unsupported.

Looking at gcc.log, it seems that dg-require-stack-check is not always called.
Is there some caching in dejagnu I'm not aware of, that would ignore
the value of the
parameter (assuming that dg-require-stack-check "specific" and
dg-require-stack-check "generic" return the same value?)

Am I missing anything obvious?

Thanks,

Christophe


> Jeff
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
index 4136a68..85af877 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
@@ -2311,6 +2311,11 @@  the codeset to convert to.
 Skip the test if the target does not support profiling with option
 @var{profopt}.
 
+@item dg-require-stack-check @var{check}
+Skip the test if the target does not support the @code{-fstack-check}
+option.  If @var{check} is @code{""}, support for @code{-fstack-check}
+is checked, for @code{-fstack-check=("@var{check}")} otherwise.
+
 @item dg-require-visibility @var{vis}
 Skip the test if the target does not support the @code{visibility} attribute.
 If @var{vis} is @code{""}, support for @code{visibility("hidden")} is
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports-dg.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports-dg.exp
index 6400d64..d50d8b0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports-dg.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports-dg.exp
@@ -265,6 +265,21 @@  proc dg-require-linker-plugin { args } {
     }
 }
 
+# If this target does not support the "stack-check" option, skip this
+# test.
+
+proc dg-require-stack-check { args } {
+    set stack_check_available [ check_stack_check_available [lindex $args 1 ] ]
+    if { $stack_check_available == -1 } {
+	upvar name name
+	unresolved "$name"
+    }
+    if { $stack_check_available != 1 } {
+	upvar dg-do-what dg-do-what
+	set dg-do-what [list [lindex ${dg-do-what} 0] "N" "P"]
+    }
+}
+
 # Add any target-specific flags needed for accessing the given list
 # of features.  This must come after all dg-options.
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index fe5e777..d19892e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -1063,6 +1063,17 @@  proc check_effective_target_fstack_protector {} {
     } "-fstack-protector"]
 }
 
+# Return 1 if the target supports -fstack-check or -fstack-check=$stack_kind
+proc check_stack_check_available { stack_kind } {
+    if [string match "" $stack_kind] then {
+	set stack_opt "-fstack-check"
+    } else { set stack_opt "-fstack-check=$stack_kind" }
+
+    return [check_no_compiler_messages stack_check executable {
+	int main (void) { return 0; }
+    } "$stack_opt"]
+}
+
 # Return 1 if compilation with -freorder-blocks-and-partition is error-free
 # for trivial code, 0 otherwise.  As some targets (ARM for example) only
 # warn when -fprofile-use is also supplied we test that combination too.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/i386-9.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/i386-9.C
index 7964057..782cf87 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/i386-9.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/i386-9.C
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ 
 // Testcase by Zdenek Sojka <zsojka@seznam.cz>
 
 // { dg-do run { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } }
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "" } */
 // { dg-options "-Os -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5 -fstack-check -fno-omit-frame-pointer" }
 
 int main()
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c
index 5c99688..2a03f7c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ 
 /* { dg-require-effective-target untyped_assembly } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "" } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-fstack-check" } */
 #include "20031023-1.c"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c
index cd9d8eb..ca91af4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47653.c
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ 
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "generic" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O -fstack-check=generic -ftree-pre -fgraphite-identity" } */
 /* nvptx doesn't expose a stack.  */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { nvptx-*-* } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47443.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47443.c
index 47abea2..5a5c43f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47443.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr47443.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ 
 /* PR tree-optimization/47443 */
 /* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "generic" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O -fstack-check=generic" } */
 
 static inline int bar (char *c, int i)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48134.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48134.c
index 8dc5a6d..446ad01 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48134.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48134.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "specific" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-check=specific -fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-loop-optimize -g" } */
 
 struct S
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70017.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70017.c
index f544167..3489d5b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70017.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70017.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "generic" } */
 /* { dg-options "-fstack-check=generic" } */
 
 /* Check that the expected warning is issued for large frames.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c
index 1d1530d..eaa4058 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-checking.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 /* { dg-do run { target { *-*-linux* } } } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "" } */
 /* { dg-options "-fstack-check" } */
 
 int main(void)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c
index 88a7e6e..4b53bed 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/stack-checking.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 
 /* { dg-do run { target { *-*-linux* } } } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "" } */
 /* { dg-options "-fstack-check" } */
-/* { dg-skip-if "" { arm_thumb1 } } */
 
 int main(void)
 {
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c
index ad10209..222c075 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr48723.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "" } */
 /* { dg-options "-fstack-check -mavx" } */
 
 struct S0
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c
index 6f1c898..f7b0d71 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55672.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "generic" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O -fstack-check=generic" } */
 
 int main ()
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c
index a9f2eb4..690a784 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67265-2.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O -fstack-check" } */
 
 void foo (int n)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c
index 7827685..2671acc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67265.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ 
 /* Reduced testcase by Johannes Dewender <gnu@JonnyJD.net> */
 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-stack-check "" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O -fstack-check -fPIC" } */
 
 int a, b, c, d, e;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/opt49.adb b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/opt49.adb
index 4b91973..42ab953 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/opt49.adb
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/opt49.adb
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 -- { dg-do run }
+-- { dg-require-stack-check "" }
 -- { dg-options "-O -fstack-check" }
 
 procedure Opt49 is
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb
index 51ee1a6..eaad745 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check1.adb
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 -- { dg-do run }
+-- { dg-require-stack-check "" }
 -- { dg-options "-fstack-check" }
 
 -- This test requires architecture- and OS-specific support code for unwinding
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb
index 4a3008b..f34d647 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check2.adb
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 -- { dg-do run }
+-- { dg-require-stack-check "" }
 -- { dg-options "-fstack-check" }
 
 -- This test requires architecture- and OS-specific support code for unwinding
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb
index 734ed42..3bb859c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/stack_check3.adb
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 -- { dg-do compile }
+-- { dg-require-stack-check "" }
 -- { dg-options "-O -fstack-check" }
 
 package body Stack_Check3 is