[12/16] switchtec_ntb: add link management

switchtec_ntb checks for a link by looking at the shared memory
window. If the magic number is correct and the otherside indicates
their link is enabled then we take the link to be up.

Whenever we change our local link status we send a msg to the
otherside to check whether it's up and change their status.

The current status is maintained in a flag so ntb_is_link_up
can return quickly.

We utilize switchtec's link status notifier to also check link changes
when the switch notices a port changes state.

Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@microsemi.com>
---
 drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/switchtec_ntb.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

From: Logan Gunthorpe
> switchtec_ntb checks for a link by looking at the shared memory
> window. If the magic number is correct and the otherside indicates
> their link is enabled then we take the link to be up.
> 
> Whenever we change our local link status we send a msg to the
> otherside to check whether it's up and change their status.
> 
> The current status is maintained in a flag so ntb_is_link_up
> can return quickly.
> 
> We utilize switchtec's link status notifier to also check link changes
> when the switch notices a port changes state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@microsemi.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/switchtec_ntb.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 129 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/switchtec_ntb.c b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/switchtec_ntb.c
> index 0587b2380bcc..8ef84d45bda6 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/switchtec_ntb.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/switchtec_ntb.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static inline void _iowrite64(u64 val, void __iomem *mmio)
> 
>  struct shared_mw {
>  	u32 magic;
> +	u32 link_sta;
>  	u32 partition_id;
>  	u16 nr_direct_mw;
>  	u16 nr_lut_mw;
> @@ -102,8 +103,17 @@ struct switchtec_ntb {
>  	int nr_direct_mw;
>  	int nr_lut_mw;
>  	int direct_mw_to_bar[MAX_DIRECT_MW];
> +
> +	bool link_is_up;
> +	enum ntb_speed link_speed;
> +	enum ntb_width link_width;
>  };
> 
> +static struct switchtec_ntb *ntb_sndev(struct ntb_dev *ntb)
> +{
> +	return container_of(ntb, struct switchtec_ntb, ntb);
> +}
> +
>  static int switchtec_ntb_part_op(struct switchtec_ntb *sndev,
>  				 struct ntb_ctrl_regs __iomem *ctl,
>  				 u32 op, int wait_status)
> @@ -161,6 +171,17 @@ static int switchtec_ntb_part_op(struct switchtec_ntb *sndev,
>  	return -EIO;
>  }
> 
> +static int switchtec_ntb_send_msg(struct switchtec_ntb *sndev, int idx,
> +				  u32 val)
> +{
> +	if (idx < 0 || idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(sndev->mmio_self_dbmsg->omsg))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	iowrite32(val, &sndev->mmio_self_dbmsg->omsg[idx].msg);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int switchtec_ntb_mw_count(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int pidx)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> @@ -192,22 +213,124 @@ static int switchtec_ntb_peer_mw_get_addr(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int idx,
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static void switchtec_ntb_part_link_speed(struct switchtec_ntb *sndev,
> +					  int partition,
> +					  enum ntb_speed *speed,
> +					  enum ntb_width *width)
> +{
> +	struct switchtec_dev *stdev = sndev->stdev;
> +
> +	u32 pff = ioread32(&stdev->mmio_part_cfg[partition].vep_pff_inst_id);
> +	u32 linksta = ioread32(&stdev->mmio_pff_csr[pff].pci_cap_region[13]);
> +
> +	if (speed)
> +		*speed = (linksta >> 16) & 0xF;
> +
> +	if (width)
> +		*width = (linksta >> 20) & 0x3F;
> +}
> +
> +static void switchtec_ntb_set_link_speed(struct switchtec_ntb *sndev)
> +{
> +	enum ntb_speed self_speed, peer_speed;
> +	enum ntb_width self_width, peer_width;
> +
> +	if (!sndev->link_is_up) {
> +		sndev->link_speed = NTB_SPEED_NONE;
> +		sndev->link_width = NTB_WIDTH_NONE;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	switchtec_ntb_part_link_speed(sndev, sndev->self_partition,
> +				      &self_speed, &self_width);
> +	switchtec_ntb_part_link_speed(sndev, sndev->peer_partition,
> +				      &peer_speed, &peer_width);

Should we only set self_partition?  I think each peer should be able to set preferred speed, and negotiate down.  As written here, the last peer to set the speed overrides the setting on the peer, and even that is not atomic if they race.

> +
> +	sndev->link_speed = min(self_speed, peer_speed);
> +	sndev->link_width = min(self_width, peer_width);
> +}
> +
> +enum {
> +	LINK_MESSAGE = 0,
> +	MSG_LINK_UP = 1,
> +	MSG_LINK_DOWN = 2,
> +	MSG_CHECK_LINK = 3,
> +};
> +
> +static void switchtec_ntb_check_link(struct switchtec_ntb *sndev)
> +{
> +	int link_sta;
> +	int old = sndev->link_is_up;
> +
> +	link_sta = sndev->self_shared->link_sta;
> +	if (link_sta) {
> +		u64 peer = ioread64(&sndev->peer_shared->magic);
> +
> +		if ((peer & 0xFFFFFFFF) == SWITCHTEC_NTB_MAGIC)
> +			link_sta = peer >> 32;
> +		else
> +			link_sta = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	sndev->link_is_up = link_sta;
> +	switchtec_ntb_set_link_speed(sndev);
> +
> +	if (link_sta != old) {
> +		switchtec_ntb_send_msg(sndev, LINK_MESSAGE, MSG_CHECK_LINK);
> +		ntb_link_event(&sndev->ntb);
> +		dev_info(&sndev->stdev->dev, "ntb link %s",
> +			 link_sta ? "up" : "down");
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void switchtec_ntb_link_notification(struct switchtec_dev *stdev)
> +{
> +	struct switchtec_ntb *sndev = stdev->sndev;
> +
> +	switchtec_ntb_check_link(sndev);
> +}
> +
>  static u64 switchtec_ntb_link_is_up(struct ntb_dev *ntb,
>  				    enum ntb_speed *speed,
>  				    enum ntb_width *width)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	struct switchtec_ntb *sndev = ntb_sndev(ntb);
> +
> +	if (speed)
> +		*speed = sndev->link_speed;
> +	if (width)
> +		*width = sndev->link_width;
> +
> +	return sndev->link_is_up;
>  }
> 
>  static int switchtec_ntb_link_enable(struct ntb_dev *ntb,
>  				     enum ntb_speed max_speed,
>  				     enum ntb_width max_width)
>  {
> +	struct switchtec_ntb *sndev = ntb_sndev(ntb);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&sndev->stdev->dev, "enabling link");
> +
> +	sndev->self_shared->link_sta = 1;
> +	switchtec_ntb_send_msg(sndev, LINK_MESSAGE, MSG_LINK_UP);
> +
> +	switchtec_ntb_check_link(sndev);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
>  static int switchtec_ntb_link_disable(struct ntb_dev *ntb)
>  {
> +	struct switchtec_ntb *sndev = ntb_sndev(ntb);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&sndev->stdev->dev, "disabling link");
> +
> +	sndev->self_shared->link_sta = 0;
> +	switchtec_ntb_send_msg(sndev, LINK_MESSAGE, MSG_LINK_UP);
> +
> +	switchtec_ntb_check_link(sndev);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> @@ -555,6 +678,9 @@ static irqreturn_t switchtec_ntb_message_isr(int irq, void *dev)
>  			dev_dbg(&sndev->stdev->dev, "message: %d %08x\n", i,
>  				(u32)msg);
>  			iowrite8(1, &sndev->mmio_self_dbmsg->imsg[i].status);
> +
> +			if (i == LINK_MESSAGE)
> +				switchtec_ntb_check_link(sndev);
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> @@ -659,6 +785,7 @@ static int switchtec_ntb_add(struct device *dev,
>  		goto deinit_and_exit;
> 
>  	stdev->sndev = sndev;
> +	stdev->link_notifier = switchtec_ntb_link_notification;
>  	dev_info(dev, "NTB device registered");
> 
>  	return 0;
> @@ -682,6 +809,7 @@ void switchtec_ntb_remove(struct device *dev,
>  	if (!sndev)
>  		return;
> 
> +	stdev->link_notifier = NULL;
>  	stdev->sndev = NULL;
>  	ntb_unregister_device(&sndev->ntb);
>  	switchtec_ntb_deinit_db_msg_irq(sndev);
> --
> 2.11.0

On 6/29/2017 12:11 PM, Allen Hubbe wrote:

> Should we only set self_partition?  I think each peer should be able to set preferred speed, and negotiate down.  As written here, the last peer to set the speed overrides the setting on the peer, and even that is not atomic if they race.

This function isn't actually setting the link speed. (Though I can 
understand the confusion from the name.) It's just reporting the slowest 
speed on the link between the peers for the link_is_up function. (Each 
port will have negotiated it's own speed).

I don't think switchtec has the ability to actually change the port 
speed or width. (Seeing they are negotiated on boot).

Logan