Message ID | 1294678460-7492-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote: > None of the other qemu-img subcommands uses writethrough, and there's no reason > why snapshot should be special. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> > --- > qemu-img.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c index afd9ed2..1e65ea8 100644 --- a/qemu-img.c +++ b/qemu-img.c @@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ static int img_snapshot(int argc, char **argv) int action = 0; qemu_timeval tv; - bdrv_oflags = BDRV_O_RDWR; + bdrv_oflags = BDRV_O_FLAGS | BDRV_O_RDWR; /* Parse commandline parameters */ for(;;) { c = getopt(argc, argv, "la:c:d:h");
None of the other qemu-img subcommands uses writethrough, and there's no reason why snapshot should be special. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> --- qemu-img.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)