Patchwork Don't XFAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c on alpha, i386, x86_64 (PR tree-optimization/46021)

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Rainer Orth
Date Jan. 5, 2011, 4:50 p.m.
Message ID <yddr5crpa5t.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/77616/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Rainer Orth - Jan. 5, 2011, 4:50 p.m.
Given that this test XPASSes on alpha-dec-osf5.1b, i386-pc-solaris2.*
(both 32 and 64-bit) for a long time and just produces noise, I propose
the following patch to reduce that noise.

On the other hand, given that the xfail { ! <target> } list is growing
ever longer, it may finally be time to invert the xfail and only do it
where necessary.

However, bootstrapped without regressions on i386-pc-solaris2.11.

Ok for mainline?

	Rainer


2011-01-02  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

	PR tree-optimization/46021
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on alpha*-*-*,
	i?86-*-*, x86_64-*-*.

Patch

diff -r 893c657483ed gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c	Sat Jan 01 23:58:43 2011 +0100
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c	Sun Jan 02 00:04:15 2011 +0100
@@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ 
    that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST).  Fix this
    by teaching dom to look through && and register all components
    as true.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */