Message ID | 681500CE65202E47A192754B01DAB4671B16747E36@SDE12.beckipc.net |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:28:12PM +0200, Michail Georgios Etairidis wrote: > The i2c-imx driver incorrectly uses readb()/writeb() to read and write > to the appropriate registers when performing a repeated start. The > appropriate imx_i2c_read_reg()/imx_i2c_write_reg() functions should be > used instead. Performing a repeated start results in a kernel panic. On what platform? It has a different regshift, I assume. Anyone from PTX or Freescale can confirm? > I am resubmitting this patch as the previous one was erroneous. This > patch is based on the current upstream kernel code. There is no Signed-off-by. I need that. Read Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst if you don't know about it yet.
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:28:12PM +0200, Michail Georgios Etairidis wrote: > The i2c-imx driver incorrectly uses readb()/writeb() to read and write to the appropriate registers when performing a repeated start. The appropriate imx_i2c_read_reg()/imx_i2c_write_reg() functions should be used instead. Performing a repeated start results in a kernel panic. please limit lines in the commit to 76 chars. > I am resubmitting this patch as the previous one was erroneous. This patch is based on the current upstream kernel code. > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c > index 95ed171..54a47b4 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c > @@ -734,9 +734,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_dma_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, > * the first read operation, otherwise the first read cost > * one extra clock cycle. > */ > - temp = readb(i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); > + temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); > temp |= I2CR_MTX; > - writeb(temp, i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); > + imx_i2c_write_reg(temp, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); These were introduced by commit ce1a78840ff7a authored by Yao Yuan. > } > msgs->buf[msgs->len-1] = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR); > > @@ -857,9 +857,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, struct i2c_msg *msgs, bo > * the first read operation, otherwise the first read cost > * one extra clock cycle. > */ > - temp = readb(i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); > + temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); > temp |= I2CR_MTX; > - writeb(temp, i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); > + imx_i2c_write_reg(temp, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); These were introduced by commit 054b62d9f25c9 authored by Fugang Duan. I added these two people to Cc:, maybe they are still at Freescale/NXP and can comment. imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); results in readb(i2c_imx->base + (reg << i2c_imx->hwdata->regshift)); where .regshift is 2 for imx and 0 for vf610. So the patch makes a difference on the former platforms only. Best regards Uwe
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:54 AM >On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:28:12PM +0200, Michail Georgios Etairidis wrote: >> The i2c-imx driver incorrectly uses readb()/writeb() to read and write to the >appropriate registers when performing a repeated start. The appropriate >imx_i2c_read_reg()/imx_i2c_write_reg() functions should be used instead. >Performing a repeated start results in a kernel panic. > >please limit lines in the commit to 76 chars. > >> I am resubmitting this patch as the previous one was erroneous. This patch >is based on the current upstream kernel code. >> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c >> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c index 95ed171..54a47b4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c >> @@ -734,9 +734,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_dma_read(struct imx_i2c_struct >*i2c_imx, >> * the first read operation, otherwise the first read cost >> * one extra clock cycle. >> */ >> - temp = readb(i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); >> + temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); >> temp |= I2CR_MTX; >> - writeb(temp, i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); >> + imx_i2c_write_reg(temp, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); > >These were introduced by commit ce1a78840ff7a authored by Yao Yuan. > >> } >> msgs->buf[msgs->len-1] = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR); >> >> @@ -857,9 +857,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_read(struct imx_i2c_struct >*i2c_imx, struct i2c_msg *msgs, bo >> * the first read operation, otherwise the first >read cost >> * one extra clock cycle. >> */ >> - temp = readb(i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); >> + temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, >IMX_I2C_I2CR); >> temp |= I2CR_MTX; >> - writeb(temp, i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); >> + imx_i2c_write_reg(temp, i2c_imx, >IMX_I2C_I2CR); > >These were introduced by commit 054b62d9f25c9 authored by Fugang Duan. > >I added these two people to Cc:, maybe they are still at Freescale/NXP and >can comment. > > imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); > >results in > > readb(i2c_imx->base + (reg << i2c_imx->hwdata->regshift)); > >where .regshift is 2 for imx and 0 for vf610. So the patch makes a difference >on the former platforms only. > >Best regards >Uwe > The patch seems fine. It should use .imx_i2c_read_reg() instead of readb(). Acked-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@nxp.com> >-- >Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | >Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c index 95ed171..54a47b4 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c @@ -734,9 +734,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_dma_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, * the first read operation, otherwise the first read cost * one extra clock cycle. */ - temp = readb(i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); + temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); temp |= I2CR_MTX; - writeb(temp, i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); + imx_i2c_write_reg(temp, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); } msgs->buf[msgs->len-1] = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR); @@ -857,9 +857,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, struct i2c_msg *msgs, bo * the first read operation, otherwise the first read cost * one extra clock cycle. */ - temp = readb(i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); + temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); temp |= I2CR_MTX; - writeb(temp, i2c_imx->base + IMX_I2C_I2CR); + imx_i2c_write_reg(temp, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); } } else if (i == (msgs->len - 2)) { dev_dbg(&i2c_imx->adapter.dev,