@@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
ppc64_runlatch_off();
HMT_very_low();
while (!need_resched()) {
- if (likely(snooze_timeout_en) && get_tb() > snooze_exit_time)
+ if (likely(snooze_timeout_en) && get_tb() > snooze_exit_time) {
+ /*
+ * Task has not woken up but we are exiting the polling
+ * loop anyway. Require a barrier after polling is
+ * cleared to order subsequent test of need_resched().
+ */
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
+ smp_mb();
break;
+ }
}
HMT_medium();
ppc64_runlatch_on();
clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
- smp_mb();
return index;
}
@@ -71,13 +71,20 @@ static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
while (!need_resched()) {
HMT_low();
HMT_very_low();
- if (snooze_timeout_en && get_tb() > snooze_exit_time)
+ if (likely(snooze_timeout_en) && get_tb() > snooze_exit_time) {
+ /*
+ * Task has not woken up but we are exiting the polling
+ * loop anyway. Require a barrier after polling is
+ * cleared to order subsequent test of need_resched().
+ */
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
+ smp_mb();
break;
+ }
}
HMT_medium();
clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
- smp_mb();
idle_loop_epilog(in_purr);
A memory barrier is not required after the task wakes up, only if we clear the polling flag before waking. The case where we have work to do is the important one, so optimise for it. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> --- drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 11 +++++++++-- drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c | 11 +++++++++-- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)