diff mbox

[net-2.6] starfire: Fix dma_addr_t size test for MIPS

Message ID 1293632777.2928.127.camel@localhost
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Ben Hutchings Dec. 29, 2010, 2:26 p.m. UTC
Commit 56543af "starfire: use BUILD_BUG_ON for netdrv_addr_t" revealed
that the preprocessor condition used to find the size of dma_addr_t
yielded the wrong result for some architectures and configurations.
This was kluged for 64-bit PowerPC in commit 3e502e6 by adding yet
another case to the condition.  However, 64-bit MIPS configurations
are not detected reliably either.

This should be fixed by using CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT, but that
isn't yet defined everywhere it should be.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
The MIPS conditions are changed to match those Tomonori specified for
CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT.

Please change the condition to defined(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT) in
net-next-2.6.  I leave it up to you to decide when to make that change.
(Simply applying a patch to net-next-2.6 now will result in a later
merge conflict and breakage for those two architectures.)

Ben.

 drivers/net/starfire.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Comments

David Miller Dec. 31, 2010, 8:34 p.m. UTC | #1
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:26:17 +0000

> Commit 56543af "starfire: use BUILD_BUG_ON for netdrv_addr_t" revealed
> that the preprocessor condition used to find the size of dma_addr_t
> yielded the wrong result for some architectures and configurations.
> This was kluged for 64-bit PowerPC in commit 3e502e6 by adding yet
> another case to the condition.  However, 64-bit MIPS configurations
> are not detected reliably either.
> 
> This should be fixed by using CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT, but that
> isn't yet defined everywhere it should be.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

Applied to net-2.6, thanks.

> The MIPS conditions are changed to match those Tomonori specified for
> CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT.
> 
> Please change the condition to defined(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT) in
> net-next-2.6.  I leave it up to you to decide when to make that change.
> (Simply applying a patch to net-next-2.6 now will result in a later
> merge conflict and breakage for those two architectures.)

The thing to do here is to make this change after the next merge
window takes in Fujita's patch definiting ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT from
the -mm set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/starfire.c b/drivers/net/starfire.c
index 4adf124..a4f2bd5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/starfire.c
+++ b/drivers/net/starfire.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@  static int full_duplex[MAX_UNITS] = {0, };
  * This SUCKS.
  * We need a much better method to determine if dma_addr_t is 64-bit.
  */
-#if (defined(__i386__) && defined(CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G)) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined (__ia64__) || defined(__alpha__) || defined(__mips64__) || (defined(__mips__) && defined(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR)) || (defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT))
+#if (defined(__i386__) && defined(CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G)) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined (__ia64__) || defined(__alpha__) || (defined(CONFIG_MIPS) && ((defined(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR)) || defined(CONFIG_64BIT))) || (defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT))
 /* 64-bit dma_addr_t */
 #define ADDR_64BITS	/* This chip uses 64 bit addresses. */
 #define netdrv_addr_t __le64