Message ID | 1292933384-3032-2-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
Dear Michal Simek, In message <1292933384-3032-2-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu> you wrote: > Microblaze implement enable/disable interrupts through MSR > that's why disable_interrupts function should return 1. > > Signed-off-by: John Linn <john.linn@xilinx.com> > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> > --- > arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c b/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c > index e9d53c1..331746c 100644 > --- a/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c > +++ b/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void enable_interrupts (void) > int disable_interrupts (void) > { > MSRCLR(0x2); > - return 0; > + return 1; > } I think this is wrong. disable_interrupts() should return 1 only if interrupts were enabled before, so code like this can make sure that some parts are run with interrupts disabled, but then restore the previous state, no matter if this had interrupts on or off: int flag = disable_interrupts(); ... do something ... if (flag) enable_interrupts(); With your code, we would ALWAYS enable interrupts, even if these were off before. For reference, see for example arch/powerpc/lib/interrupts.c Best regards, Wolfgang Denk
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c b/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c index e9d53c1..331746c 100644 --- a/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c +++ b/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void enable_interrupts (void) int disable_interrupts (void) { MSRCLR(0x2); - return 0; + return 1; } #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_INTC_0