diff mbox

Cleanup dg directives

Message ID AB9DD688-DE8B-48D0-8C65-766A57834291@lps.ens.fr
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Dominique d'Humières April 15, 2017, 2:46 p.m. UTC 
I am planning to commit as obvious the following changes


Dominique

Comments

Janus Weil April 15, 2017, 2:56 p.m. UTC | #1 
2017-04-15 16:46 GMT+02:00 Dominique d'Humières <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>:
> I am planning to commit as obvious the following changes

Sure! But ...


> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/deferred_character_3.f90        2015-11-15 15:12:11.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/deferred_character_3.f90  2017-04-15 11:43:05.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -! {dg_do run }
> +! { dg_do run }
>  !

... this should certainly be a "dg-do" ?!?

Cheers,
Janus
Dominique d'Humières April 15, 2017, 3:01 p.m. UTC | #2 
> Le 15 avr. 2017 à 16:56, Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org> a écrit :
> 
> 2017-04-15 16:46 GMT+02:00 Dominique d'Humières <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>:
>> I am planning to commit as obvious the following changes
> 
> Sure! But ...
> 
> 
>> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/deferred_character_3.f90        2015-11-15 15:12:11.000000000 +0100
>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/deferred_character_3.f90  2017-04-15 11:43:05.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -! {dg_do run }
>> +! { dg_do run }
>> !
> 
> ... this should certainly be a "dg-do" ?!?
> 
> Cheers,
> Janus

Good catch!-)

Thanks,

Dominique
Dominique d'Humières April 15, 2017, 6:17 p.m. UTC | #3 
Committed as revision r246940.

Dominique

> Le 15 avr. 2017 à 16:56, Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org> a écrit :
> 
> 2017-04-15 16:46 GMT+02:00 Dominique d'Humières <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>:
>> I am planning to commit as obvious the following changes
> 
> Sure! But ...
> 
> 
>> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/deferred_character_3.f90        2015-11-15 15:12:11.000000000 +0100
>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/deferred_character_3.f90  2017-04-15 11:43:05.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -! {dg_do run }
>> +! { dg_do run }
>> !
> 
> ... this should certainly be a "dg-do" ?!?
> 
> Cheers,
> Janus
diff mbox

Patch

--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/deferred_character_3.f90	2015-11-15 15:12:11.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/deferred_character_3.f90	2017-04-15 11:43:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-! {dg_do run }
+! { dg_do run }
 !
 ! Tests the fix for PR67674
 !
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_29.f90	2015-05-19 11:22:18.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_29.f90	2017-04-15 11:44:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-! { dg-do compile}
+! { dg-do compile }
 ! PR fortran/66057
 !
 ! Original code from Gerhard Steinmetz
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr41922.f90	2016-07-31 04:06:39.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr41922.f90	2017-04-15 11:43:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-! { dg-do compile}
+! { dg-do compile }
 ! { dg-options -std=gnu }
       Subroutine RestoreR8Run()
       Implicit NONE
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr70006.f90	2016-07-31 03:47:24.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr70006.f90	2017-04-15 11:44:11.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-! { dg-do compile}
+! { dg-do compile }
 program test
    print 1, 'string 1' ! { dg-error "FORMAT label 1" " " { target *-*-* } 3 }
    print 1, 'string 2' ! { dg-error "FORMAT label 1" " " { target *-*-* } 4 }
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/multi-clause.f90	2015-11-06 06:40:12.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/multi-clause.f90	2017-04-15 13:04:20.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 
 ! Test if variable appearing in multiple clauses are errors.
 
-! { dg-compile }
+! { dg-do compile }
 
 program combined
   implicit none