diff mbox

spapr-cpu-core: Release ICPState object during CPU unrealization

Message ID 1491984907-9894-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Bharata B Rao April 12, 2017, 8:15 a.m. UTC
Recent commits that re-organized ICPState object missed to destroy
the object when CPU is unrealized. Fix this so that CPU unplug
doesn't abort QEMU.

Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Bharata B Rao April 12, 2017, 8:21 a.m. UTC | #1
This should be considered for ppc-for-2.10 branch of dwg's tree.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:45:07PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Recent commits that re-organized ICPState object missed to destroy
> the object when CPU is unrealized. Fix this so that CPU unplug
> doesn't abort QEMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> index 2e689b5..4389ef4 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_unrealizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>          PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> 
>          spapr_cpu_destroy(cpu);
> +        object_unparent(cpu->intc);
>          cpu_remove_sync(cs);
>          object_unparent(obj);
>      }
> -- 
> 2.7.4
Cédric Le Goater April 12, 2017, 8:47 a.m. UTC | #2
On 04/12/2017 10:15 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Recent commits that re-organized ICPState object missed to destroy
> the object when CPU is unrealized. Fix this so that CPU unplug
> doesn't abort QEMU.

Indeed.

> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

I am wondering if we should not be doing the unparent under 
spapr_cpu_destroy() or even xics_cpu_destroy(). Apart from
that, 

Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>

Thanks,

C.

> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> index 2e689b5..4389ef4 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_unrealizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>          PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
>  
>          spapr_cpu_destroy(cpu);
> +        object_unparent(cpu->intc);
>          cpu_remove_sync(cs);
>          object_unparent(obj);
>      }
>
Bharata B Rao April 12, 2017, 8:53 a.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:47:39AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 04/12/2017 10:15 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > Recent commits that re-organized ICPState object missed to destroy
> > the object when CPU is unrealized. Fix this so that CPU unplug
> > doesn't abort QEMU.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> I am wondering if we should not be doing the unparent under 
> spapr_cpu_destroy() or even xics_cpu_destroy(). Apart from
> that, 

Thought so, but since object is created in realize routinte itself
(and not in any of its callers), did the object destruction in
unrealize to be symmetrical :)

Regards,
Bharata.
Cédric Le Goater April 12, 2017, 9:03 a.m. UTC | #4
On 04/12/2017 10:53 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:47:39AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 04/12/2017 10:15 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>>> Recent commits that re-organized ICPState object missed to destroy
>>> the object when CPU is unrealized. Fix this so that CPU unplug
>>> doesn't abort QEMU.
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> I am wondering if we should not be doing the unparent under 
>> spapr_cpu_destroy() or even xics_cpu_destroy(). Apart from
>> that, 
> 
> Thought so, but since object is created in realize routinte itself
> (and not in any of its callers), did the object destruction in
> unrealize to be symmetrical :)

yes. I think it is a good pratice to unparent/free the object 
in the same file it was allocated.

Thanks,

C.
David Gibson April 13, 2017, 2:54 a.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:45:07PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Recent commits that re-organized ICPState object missed to destroy
> the object when CPU is unrealized. Fix this so that CPU unplug
> doesn't abort QEMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Applied to ppc-for-2.10, thanks.

> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> index 2e689b5..4389ef4 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_unrealizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>          PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
>  
>          spapr_cpu_destroy(cpu);
> +        object_unparent(cpu->intc);
>          cpu_remove_sync(cs);
>          object_unparent(obj);
>      }
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
index 2e689b5..4389ef4 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@  static void spapr_cpu_core_unrealizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
         PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
 
         spapr_cpu_destroy(cpu);
+        object_unparent(cpu->intc);
         cpu_remove_sync(cs);
         object_unparent(obj);
     }