Message ID | 1491512301.9159.18.camel@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, David Malcolm wrote:
> OK to commit?
If that's what the standard uses, yes, thanks. (We still may
want to add "C++" in there, unless you feel the context is always
clear enough anyway, which I could well see...)
Gerald
Index: htdocs/codingconventions.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/codingconventions.html,v retrieving revision 1.80 diff -u -p -r1.80 codingconventions.html --- htdocs/codingconventions.html 13 Mar 2017 22:01:05 -0000 1.80 +++ htdocs/codingconventions.html 6 Apr 2017 20:55:51 -0000 @@ -448,6 +448,12 @@ and code. The following table lists som <td>"Objective C"</td> </tr> <tr> + <td>"the one-definition rule"</td> + <td>"One Definition Rule", "the C++ One Definition Rule", + or "one definition rule"</td> + <td>Style used in the C++17 standard</td> + </tr> + <tr> <td>"prologue"</td> <td>"prolog"</td> <td>Established convention</td>