Message ID | 20170406195529.GA6653@salvia |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Pablo Neira |
Headers | show |
Hi Pablo, > -----Original Message----- > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso [mailto:pablo@netfilter.org] > Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 3:55 AM > To: gfree.wind@foxmail.com > Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org; Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 1/1] netfilter: ctlink: Return error directly when > create expect without help > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:52:52AM +0800, gfree.wind@foxmail.com wrote: > > From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com> > > > > The expect check func "__nf_ct_expect_check" asks the master_help is > > necessary. So it is unnecessary to go ahead in ctnetlink_alloc_expect > > when there is no help. > > > > Actually the commit bc01befdcf3e ("netfilter: ctnetlink: add support > > for user-space expectation helpers") permits ctlink create one expect > > even though there is no master help. But the latter commit > > 3d058d7bc2c5 > > ("netfilter: rework user-space expectation helper support") disables > > it again. > > Probably reject this upfront if no nfct_help(ct) is there. > > See patch attached. Yes, it is better. Would you apply this patch which you attached directly, or need I send another v2 update? Best Regards Feng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 06:19:07AM +0800, Gao Feng wrote: > Yes, it is better. > Would you apply this patch which you attached directly, or need I send > another v2 update? I'll apply this one. No need to send v2. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
commit 543b8a39eaacef70822f23f8e8de336c18761c40 Author: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com> Date: Tue Mar 28 09:52:52 2017 +0800 netfilter: ctnetlink: Expectations must have a conntrack helper area The expect check function __nf_ct_expect_check() asks the master_help is necessary. So it is unnecessary to go ahead in ctnetlink_alloc_expect when there is no help. Actually the commit bc01befdcf3e ("netfilter: ctnetlink: add support for user-space expectation helpers") permits ctnetlink create one expect even though there is no master help. But the latter commit 3d058d7bc2c5 ("netfilter: rework user-space expectation helper support") disables it again. Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c index ecdc324c7785..cd0a6d270ebe 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c @@ -3038,6 +3038,10 @@ ctnetlink_alloc_expect(const struct nlattr * const cda[], struct nf_conn *ct, struct nf_conn_help *help; int err; + help = nfct_help(ct); + if (!help) + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP); + if (cda[CTA_EXPECT_CLASS] && helper) { class = ntohl(nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_EXPECT_CLASS])); if (class > helper->expect_class_max) @@ -3047,26 +3051,11 @@ ctnetlink_alloc_expect(const struct nlattr * const cda[], struct nf_conn *ct, if (!exp) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - help = nfct_help(ct); - if (!help) { - if (!cda[CTA_EXPECT_TIMEOUT]) { - err = -EINVAL; - goto err_out; - } - exp->timeout.expires = - jiffies + ntohl(nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_EXPECT_TIMEOUT])) * HZ; - - exp->flags = NF_CT_EXPECT_USERSPACE; - if (cda[CTA_EXPECT_FLAGS]) { - exp->flags |= - ntohl(nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_EXPECT_FLAGS])); - } + if (cda[CTA_EXPECT_FLAGS]) { + exp->flags = ntohl(nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_EXPECT_FLAGS])); + exp->flags &= ~NF_CT_EXPECT_USERSPACE; } else { - if (cda[CTA_EXPECT_FLAGS]) { - exp->flags = ntohl(nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_EXPECT_FLAGS])); - exp->flags &= ~NF_CT_EXPECT_USERSPACE; - } else - exp->flags = 0; + exp->flags = 0; } if (cda[CTA_EXPECT_FN]) { const char *name = nla_data(cda[CTA_EXPECT_FN]);