Message ID | 20170328175035.13897-4-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:50:34PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > The mv88e6xxx_info structure for the 88E6191 chip was pointing the > mv88e6391_ops definition instead of mv88e6191_ops. Fix this. mv88e6391_ops and mv88e6191_ops appear to be identical, so effectively there is no bug here. So no need to have this in -stable. Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Andrew
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c index 3918790c4a75..da7bf608cc58 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c @@ -3846,7 +3846,7 @@ static const struct mv88e6xxx_info mv88e6xxx_table[] = { .atu_move_port_mask = 0x1f, .tag_protocol = DSA_TAG_PROTO_DSA, .flags = MV88E6XXX_FLAGS_FAMILY_6390, - .ops = &mv88e6391_ops, + .ops = &mv88e6191_ops, }, [MV88E6240] = {
The mv88e6xxx_info structure for the 88E6191 chip was pointing the mv88e6391_ops definition instead of mv88e6191_ops. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> --- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)