diff mbox

Fix gimplification of const var initialization from COND_EXPR (PR c++/80129)

Message ID 20170322131328.GD11094@tucnak
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Jakub Jelinek March 22, 2017, 1:13 p.m. UTC
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:59:09AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Yeah, changing it to VAR_P and expanding the comment so it says
> it avoids incorrect promotion to readonly-static.  (so it _is_
> fishy that we have multiple assignments to TREE_READONLY objects
> given that code looks at a single assignment only)

So like this?

2017-03-22  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c++/80129
	* gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs) <case COND_EXPR>: Clear
	TREE_READONLY on result if writing it more than once.

	* g++.dg/torture/pr80129.C: New test.


	Jakub

Comments

Richard Biener March 22, 2017, 1:26 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:59:09AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Yeah, changing it to VAR_P and expanding the comment so it says
> > it avoids incorrect promotion to readonly-static.  (so it _is_
> > fishy that we have multiple assignments to TREE_READONLY objects
> > given that code looks at a single assignment only)
> 
> So like this?

Yes.

Thanks,
Richard.

> 2017-03-22  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR c++/80129
> 	* gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs) <case COND_EXPR>: Clear
> 	TREE_READONLY on result if writing it more than once.
> 
> 	* g++.dg/torture/pr80129.C: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/gimplify.c.jj	2017-03-21 07:56:55.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/gimplify.c	2017-03-21 13:37:45.555612652 +0100
> @@ -5098,6 +5098,14 @@ gimplify_modify_expr_rhs (tree *expr_p,
>  	      if (ret != GS_ERROR)
>  		ret = GS_OK;
>  
> +	      /* If we are going to write RESULT more than once, clear
> +		 TREE_READONLY flag, otherwise we might incorrectly promote
> +		 the variable to static const and initialize it at compile
> +		 time in one of the branches.  */
> +	      if (VAR_P (result)
> +		  && TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)) != void_type_node
> +		  && TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 2)) != void_type_node)
> +		TREE_READONLY (result) = 0;
>  	      if (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)) != void_type_node)
>  		TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)
>  		  = build2 (code, void_type_node, result,
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr80129.C.jj	2017-03-21 13:40:04.179852313 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr80129.C	2017-03-21 13:41:32.121735570 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +// PR c++/80129
> +// { dg-do run }
> +// { dg-options "-std=c++11" }
> +
> +struct A { bool a; int b; };
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  bool c = false;
> +  const A x = c ? A {true, 1} : A {false, 0};
> +  if (x.a)
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +}
> 
> 	Jakub
> 
>
diff mbox

Patch

--- gcc/gimplify.c.jj	2017-03-21 07:56:55.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/gimplify.c	2017-03-21 13:37:45.555612652 +0100
@@ -5098,6 +5098,14 @@  gimplify_modify_expr_rhs (tree *expr_p,
 	      if (ret != GS_ERROR)
 		ret = GS_OK;
 
+	      /* If we are going to write RESULT more than once, clear
+		 TREE_READONLY flag, otherwise we might incorrectly promote
+		 the variable to static const and initialize it at compile
+		 time in one of the branches.  */
+	      if (VAR_P (result)
+		  && TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)) != void_type_node
+		  && TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 2)) != void_type_node)
+		TREE_READONLY (result) = 0;
 	      if (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)) != void_type_node)
 		TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)
 		  = build2 (code, void_type_node, result,
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr80129.C.jj	2017-03-21 13:40:04.179852313 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr80129.C	2017-03-21 13:41:32.121735570 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ 
+// PR c++/80129
+// { dg-do run }
+// { dg-options "-std=c++11" }
+
+struct A { bool a; int b; };
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  bool c = false;
+  const A x = c ? A {true, 1} : A {false, 0};
+  if (x.a)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}