Message ID | 20170322091002.GB14520@mwanda |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
On 2017-03-22 5:10 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Presumably if there is an "add" function, there is also a "del" > function. But it causes a static checker warning because it looks like > a common cut and paste bug. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Agreed, looks like a cut-n-paste buglet. Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:10:02 +0300 > Presumably if there is an "add" function, there is also a "del" > function. But it causes a static checker warning because it looks like > a common cut and paste bug. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Looks good, applied, thanks Dan.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c index 8c4c273643dc..203c8c3752e7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c @@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static void efx_udp_tunnel_del(struct net_device *dev, struct udp_tunnel_info *t tnl.type = (u16)efx_tunnel_type; tnl.port = ti->port; - if (efx->type->udp_tnl_add_port) + if (efx->type->udp_tnl_del_port) (void)efx->type->udp_tnl_del_port(efx, tnl); }
Presumably if there is an "add" function, there is also a "del" function. But it causes a static checker warning because it looks like a common cut and paste bug. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>