@@ -218,14 +218,14 @@ static void test_keyval_parse_list(void)
QDECREF(qdict);
/* Multiple indexes, last one wins */
- qdict = keyval_parse("list.1=goner,list.0=null,list.1=eins,list.2=zwei",
+ qdict = keyval_parse("list.1=goner,list.0=null,list.01=eins,list.2=zwei",
NULL, &error_abort);
g_assert_cmpint(qdict_size(qdict), ==, 1);
check_list012(qdict_get_qlist(qdict, "list"));
QDECREF(qdict);
/* List at deeper nesting */
- qdict = keyval_parse("a.list.1=eins,a.list.0=null,a.list.2=zwei",
+ qdict = keyval_parse("a.list.1=eins,a.list.00=null,a.list.2=zwei",
NULL, &error_abort);
g_assert_cmpint(qdict_size(qdict), ==, 1);
sub_qdict = qdict_get_qdict(qdict, "a");
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static void test_keyval_parse_list(void)
g_assert(!qdict);
/* Missing list indexes */
- qdict = keyval_parse("list.2=lonely", NULL, &err);
+ qdict = keyval_parse("list.1=lonely", NULL, &err);
error_free_or_abort(&err);
g_assert(!qdict);
qdict = keyval_parse("list.0=null,list.2=eins,list.02=zwei", NULL, &err);
We have a negative test case for a list index with leading zero. Add positive ones. Tweak the test case for list index greater or equal the number of elements: test "equal" instead of "greater" to guard against off-by-one mistakes. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> --- tests/test-keyval.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)