From patchwork Sun Mar 19 07:53:16 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gerald Pfeifer X-Patchwork-Id: 740653 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vmBCl560Yz9ryZ for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:53:37 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="lD+TfYUz"; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= default; b=h1e+5BAkjbOhUa/sGz4yHB+ucyFwqU3dpuWMO6xN+uYQN8vyaWFMs Gt9J2Zrele9ZwCoGk4jwwLICbUlwvI7o3CW9MqgqvRxVdfRYCF/vj+chAFVujd2n V/oiNSGFN/gjpxMYKMNGR6PBeec+Dm0EVlTUbP5uROmn/ZSkWO4jvE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= default; bh=miRTsFJ8B/vkxFNm0xRyQJ8wh70=; b=lD+TfYUzW4adHN0gjBdi XUvWRIfOVMYotapCUPvFP8xz3GJS1s9j4I8SywNCBvjtY7fJjjxrVX5a0FPBKmqP JeysCiepdqOm2t4BwC3MLga7G0TQ+A7xuFXKxfAWYrqpFyNbY//hivyop6e63tew chJstbZgP0LKaaXF7QKwK4o= Received: (qmail 111096 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2017 07:53:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111050 invoked by uid 89); 19 Mar 2017 07:53:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=14.2 X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 07:53:20 +0000 Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-249-200.dsl.sil.at [188.118.249.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97E043F530 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 03:53:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:53:16 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [wwwdocs] Remove "New in GCC 3.4.0" from bugs/index.html Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes GCC 3.4.0 dates back to 2004, and by now everyone really should have updated their stuff to newer G++ / C++ standards. ;-) Committed. Gerald Index: bugs/index.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.118 diff -u -r1.118 index.html --- bugs/index.html 21 Nov 2015 15:41:17 -0000 1.118 +++ bugs/index.html 19 Mar 2017 07:49:15 -0000 @@ -697,78 +697,7 @@ However, some non-conforming constructs are allowed when the command-line option -fpermissive is used.

-

New in GCC 3.4.0

- -

The new parser brings a lot of improvements, especially concerning -name-lookup.

- -
    - -
  • The "implicit typename" extension got removed (it was already deprecated -since GCC 3.1), so that the following code is now rejected, see [14.6]: -
    -template <typename> struct A
-{
-    typedef int X;
-};
-
-template <typename T> struct B
-{
-    A<T>::X          x;  // error
-    typename A<T>::X y;  // OK
-};
-
-B<void> b;
-
    • - -
  • For similar reasons, the following code now requires the -template keyword, see [14.2]: -
    -template <typename> struct A
-{
-    template <int> struct X {};
-};
-
-template <typename T> struct B
-{
-    typename A<T>::X<0>          x;  // error
-    typename A<T>::template X<0> y;  // OK
-};
-
-B<void> b;
-
    • - -
  • We now have two-stage name-lookup, so that the following code is -rejected, see [14.6]/9: -
    -template <typename T> int foo()
-{
-    return i;  // error
-}
-
    • - -
  • This also affects members of base classes, see [14.6.2]: -
    -template <typename> struct A
-{
-    int i, j;
-};
-
-template <typename T> struct B : A<T>
-{
-    int foo1() { return i; }       // error
-    int foo2() { return this->i; } // OK
-    int foo3() { return B<T>::i; } // OK
-    int foo4() { return A<T>::i; } // OK
-
-    using A<T>::j;
-    int foo5() { return j; }       // OK
-};
-
    • - -
- -

In addition to the problems listed above, the manual contains a section on +

The manual contains a section on Common Misunderstandings with GNU C++.