Patchwork Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] pcie/aer: helper functions for pcie aer capability

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Isaku Yamahata
Date Nov. 18, 2010, 8:11 a.m.
Message ID <20101118081117.GS18102@valinux.co.jp>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/72062/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Isaku Yamahata - Nov. 18, 2010, 8:11 a.m.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:26:09PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > This patch implements helper functions for pcie aer capability
> > which will be used later.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> 
> OK, I applied this and tried to get rid of recursion,
> and clean up some whitespace and english mistakes.
> 
> Patcheset attached, pls review.
> 
> I'll push the patches out on pci branch so we can
> make progress more easily.

Thank you for cleaning it up.
Basically looks good. Except the following patch.


> Please, try to address the TODO: I think the case of
> PCIE device behind a pci bridge is not covered properly.

Will do.


From 166886f7f3e423812f4f3f467e2071c53e9dde01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <166886f7f3e423812f4f3f467e2071c53e9dde01.1290067665.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1290067665.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
References: <cover.1290067665.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
From: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:03:23 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] pcie/aer: typo

Compilation fix.

Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
---
 hw/pcie_aer.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Michael S. Tsirkin - Nov. 18, 2010, 8:52 a.m.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:11:17PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:26:09PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > This patch implements helper functions for pcie aer capability
> > > which will be used later.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> > 
> > OK, I applied this and tried to get rid of recursion,
> > and clean up some whitespace and english mistakes.
> > 
> > Patcheset attached, pls review.
> > 
> > I'll push the patches out on pci branch so we can
> > make progress more easily.
> 
> Thank you for cleaning it up.
> Basically looks good. Except the following patch.

Right. Fixed up, thanks!

> 
> > Please, try to address the TODO: I think the case of
> > PCIE device behind a pci bridge is not covered properly.
> 
> Will do.
> 
> 
> >From 166886f7f3e423812f4f3f467e2071c53e9dde01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <166886f7f3e423812f4f3f467e2071c53e9dde01.1290067665.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> In-Reply-To: <cover.1290067665.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> References: <cover.1290067665.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> From: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:03:23 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] pcie/aer: typo
> 
> Compilation fix.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> ---
>  hw/pcie_aer.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pcie_aer.c b/hw/pcie_aer.c
> index 03cc6fb..c72cbc6 100644
> --- a/hw/pcie_aer.c
> +++ b/hw/pcie_aer.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void pcie_aer_msg(PCIDevice *dev, const PCIEAERMsg *msg)
>      uint8_t type;
>  
>      while (dev) {
> -        if (!pci_is_express(parent_port)) {
> +        if (!pci_is_express(dev)) {
>              /* just ignore it */
>              /* TODO: Shouldn't we set PCI_STATUS_SIG_SYSTEM_ERROR?
>               * Consider e.g. a PCI bridge above a PCI Express device. */
> -- 
> 1.7.1.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> yamahata

Patch

diff --git a/hw/pcie_aer.c b/hw/pcie_aer.c
index 03cc6fb..c72cbc6 100644
--- a/hw/pcie_aer.c
+++ b/hw/pcie_aer.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@  static void pcie_aer_msg(PCIDevice *dev, const PCIEAERMsg *msg)
     uint8_t type;
 
     while (dev) {
-        if (!pci_is_express(parent_port)) {
+        if (!pci_is_express(dev)) {
             /* just ignore it */
             /* TODO: Shouldn't we set PCI_STATUS_SIG_SYSTEM_ERROR?
              * Consider e.g. a PCI bridge above a PCI Express device. */