| Message ID | 20170122161409.21601-4-hdegoede@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:14:09PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > On x86 we do not have devicetree to link the PWM controller and > the display controller together. So someone needs to call > pwm_add_table() to create the link, so that the i915 driver's > pwm_get(dev, "pwm_backlight") call returns the lpss' pwm0. > > The PWM subsystem does not want to have pwm_add_table() calls > directly in PWM drivers (this leads to probe ordering issues), > so lets do it here since the acpi-lpss code is always builtin. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > --- > Changes in v2: > -Set new pwm_lookup module_name field in the table > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) Rafael, do you mind if I take this through the PWM tree to resolve the build-time dependency? Thanks, Thierry > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c > index 8ea836c..794be64 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > #include <linux/platform_data/clk-lpss.h> > #include <linux/pm_domain.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > +#include <linux/pwm.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > > #include "internal.h" > @@ -154,6 +155,17 @@ static void byt_i2c_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata) > writel(0, pdata->mmio_base + LPSS_I2C_ENABLE); > } > > +/* BSW PWM used for backlight control by the i915 driver */ > +static struct pwm_lookup bsw_pwm_lookup[] = { > + PWM_LOOKUP_MODNAME("80862288:00", 0, "0000:00:02.0", "pwm_backlight", > + 0, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL, "pwm-lpss-platform"), > +}; > + > +static void bsw_pwm_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata) > +{ > + pwm_add_table(bsw_pwm_lookup, ARRAY_SIZE(bsw_pwm_lookup)); > +} > + > static const struct lpss_device_desc lpt_dev_desc = { > .flags = LPSS_CLK | LPSS_CLK_GATE | LPSS_CLK_DIVIDER | LPSS_LTR, > .prv_offset = 0x800, > @@ -191,6 +203,7 @@ static const struct lpss_device_desc byt_pwm_dev_desc = { > > static const struct lpss_device_desc bsw_pwm_dev_desc = { > .flags = LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY, > + .setup = bsw_pwm_setup, > }; > > static const struct lpss_device_desc byt_uart_dev_desc = { > -- > 2.9.3 >
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:14:09PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On x86 we do not have devicetree to link the PWM controller and >> the display controller together. So someone needs to call >> pwm_add_table() to create the link, so that the i915 driver's >> pwm_get(dev, "pwm_backlight") call returns the lpss' pwm0. >> >> The PWM subsystem does not want to have pwm_add_table() calls >> directly in PWM drivers (this leads to probe ordering issues), >> so lets do it here since the acpi-lpss code is always builtin. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> >> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> -Set new pwm_lookup module_name field in the table >> --- >> drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 13 +++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > Rafael, do you mind if I take this through the PWM tree to resolve the > build-time dependency? No, I don't, please go ahead, unless Mika/Andy see any problems in it. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 09:28:09AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Thierry Reding > <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:14:09PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> On x86 we do not have devicetree to link the PWM controller and > >> the display controller together. So someone needs to call > >> pwm_add_table() to create the link, so that the i915 driver's > >> pwm_get(dev, "pwm_backlight") call returns the lpss' pwm0. > >> > >> The PWM subsystem does not want to have pwm_add_table() calls > >> directly in PWM drivers (this leads to probe ordering issues), > >> so lets do it here since the acpi-lpss code is always builtin. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > >> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> Changes in v2: > >> -Set new pwm_lookup module_name field in the table > >> --- > >> drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > > > Rafael, do you mind if I take this through the PWM tree to resolve the > > build-time dependency? > > No, I don't, please go ahead, unless Mika/Andy see any problems in it. No problems from my side - looks good. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:33:10AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 09:28:09AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Thierry Reding > > <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:14:09PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > >> On x86 we do not have devicetree to link the PWM controller and > > >> the display controller together. So someone needs to call > > >> pwm_add_table() to create the link, so that the i915 driver's > > >> pwm_get(dev, "pwm_backlight") call returns the lpss' pwm0. > > >> > > >> The PWM subsystem does not want to have pwm_add_table() calls > > >> directly in PWM drivers (this leads to probe ordering issues), > > >> so lets do it here since the acpi-lpss code is always builtin. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > > >> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > > >> --- > > >> Changes in v2: > > >> -Set new pwm_lookup module_name field in the table > > >> --- > > >> drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > > >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > > > > > Rafael, do you mind if I take this through the PWM tree to resolve the > > > build-time dependency? > > > > No, I don't, please go ahead, unless Mika/Andy see any problems in it. > > No problems from my side - looks good. I've pulled this into a separate branch that also contains the prerequisites, so if you ever need this in ACPI, I can provide a stable branch or tag. Thanks, Thierry
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c index 8ea836c..794be64 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include <linux/platform_data/clk-lpss.h> #include <linux/pm_domain.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> +#include <linux/pwm.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include "internal.h" @@ -154,6 +155,17 @@ static void byt_i2c_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata) writel(0, pdata->mmio_base + LPSS_I2C_ENABLE); } +/* BSW PWM used for backlight control by the i915 driver */ +static struct pwm_lookup bsw_pwm_lookup[] = { + PWM_LOOKUP_MODNAME("80862288:00", 0, "0000:00:02.0", "pwm_backlight", + 0, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL, "pwm-lpss-platform"), +}; + +static void bsw_pwm_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata) +{ + pwm_add_table(bsw_pwm_lookup, ARRAY_SIZE(bsw_pwm_lookup)); +} + static const struct lpss_device_desc lpt_dev_desc = { .flags = LPSS_CLK | LPSS_CLK_GATE | LPSS_CLK_DIVIDER | LPSS_LTR, .prv_offset = 0x800, @@ -191,6 +203,7 @@ static const struct lpss_device_desc byt_pwm_dev_desc = { static const struct lpss_device_desc bsw_pwm_dev_desc = { .flags = LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY, + .setup = bsw_pwm_setup, }; static const struct lpss_device_desc byt_uart_dev_desc = {