@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr addr);
hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num);
int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
+int virtio_queue_get_max_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
int virtio_get_num_queues(VirtIODevice *vdev);
void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
hwaddr avail, hwaddr used);
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int virtio_ccw_set_vqs(SubchDev *sch, VqInfoBlock *info,
} else {
if (info) {
/* virtio-1 allows changing the ring size. */
- if (virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, index) < num) {
+ if (virtio_queue_get_max_num(vdev, index) < num) {
/* Fail if we exceed the maximum number. */
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1256,6 +1256,11 @@ int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
return vdev->vq[n].vring.num;
}
+int virtio_queue_get_max_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
+{
+ return vdev->vq[n].vring.num_default;
+}
+
int virtio_get_num_queues(VirtIODevice *vdev)
{
int i;
Current code seems to assume ring size is always decreased but this is not required by spec: what spec says is just that size can not exceed the maximum. Fix it up. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> --- include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 + hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 2 +- hw/virtio/virtio.c | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)