@@ -178,10 +178,6 @@ static const struct nla_policy dcbnl_ieee_policy[DCB_ATTR_IEEE_MAX + 1] = {
[DCB_ATTR_IEEE_QCN_STATS] = {.len = sizeof(struct ieee_qcn_stats)},
};
-static const struct nla_policy dcbnl_ieee_app[DCB_ATTR_IEEE_APP_MAX + 1] = {
- [DCB_ATTR_IEEE_APP] = {.len = sizeof(struct dcb_app)},
-};
-
/* DCB number of traffic classes nested attributes. */
static const struct nla_policy dcbnl_featcfg_nest[DCB_FEATCFG_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
[DCB_FEATCFG_ATTR_ALL] = {.type = NLA_FLAG},
@@ -1466,8 +1462,15 @@ static int dcbnl_ieee_set(struct net_device *netdev, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
nla_for_each_nested(attr, ieee[DCB_ATTR_IEEE_APP_TABLE], rem) {
struct dcb_app *app_data;
+
if (nla_type(attr) != DCB_ATTR_IEEE_APP)
continue;
+
+ if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(struct dcb_app)) {
+ err = -ERANGE;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
app_data = nla_data(attr);
if (ops->ieee_setapp)
err = ops->ieee_setapp(netdev, app_data);
The dcb netlink code was not validating that the IEEE_APP netlink element was correctly formed. Initially discovered because of the warning ‘dcbnl_ieee_app’ defined but not used. This indicated that the message was not being fully validated. Compile tested only. Do not have DCB setup. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> --- net/dcb/dcbnl.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)