diff mbox

PCI: Revert "PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports"

Message ID 20170105142029.GF3353@lahna.fi.intel.com
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Mika Westerberg Jan. 5, 2017, 2:20 p.m. UTC
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:49:40PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:58:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I would rather add a quirk to the ACPI core to prevent the power resources in
> > question from being enumerated.  Or even to prevent ACPI PM from being
> > used for the port in question.
> 
> If we are going to add a quirk, I agree that it should be put to the
> ACPI core.
> 
> However, Windows seems to be able to use _PR3 just fine. So there is
> something that we are missing or do not implement properly which causes
> all the troubles. IMHO we should try to find out what that difference is
> and fix that if possible.

Here is one idea. The _OSC method is used as a handshake between OS and
the BIOS to enable/disable certain features. One of those features is
_PR3 support (ACPI specification 6.1 p.328):

  This bit is set if OSPM supports reading _PR3and using power
  resources to switch power. Note this handshake translates to an
  operating model that the platform and OSPM supports both the power
  model containing both D3hot and D3.

Some of our development platforms has BIOS option "RTD3 enable" which
is used to enable/disable this flag (among other things). The BIOS
should return acked caps when _OSC returns but we never check those in
Linux.

Kilian, can you try the below patch and send back dmesg when the system
has been booted? It should show if the BIOS acks _PR3 or not.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Rafael J. Wysocki Jan. 5, 2017, 2:23 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thursday, January 05, 2017 04:20:29 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:49:40PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:58:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > I would rather add a quirk to the ACPI core to prevent the power resources in
> > > question from being enumerated.  Or even to prevent ACPI PM from being
> > > used for the port in question.
> > 
> > If we are going to add a quirk, I agree that it should be put to the
> > ACPI core.
> > 
> > However, Windows seems to be able to use _PR3 just fine. So there is
> > something that we are missing or do not implement properly which causes
> > all the troubles. IMHO we should try to find out what that difference is
> > and fix that if possible.
> 
> Here is one idea. The _OSC method is used as a handshake between OS and
> the BIOS to enable/disable certain features. One of those features is
> _PR3 support (ACPI specification 6.1 p.328):
> 
>   This bit is set if OSPM supports reading _PR3and using power
>   resources to switch power. Note this handshake translates to an
>   operating model that the platform and OSPM supports both the power
>   model containing both D3hot and D3.

Ah, good catch!

I forgot about this one and we definitely should do this handshake.

> Some of our development platforms has BIOS option "RTD3 enable" which
> is used to enable/disable this flag (among other things). The BIOS
> should return acked caps when _OSC returns but we never check those in
> Linux.
> 
> Kilian, can you try the below patch and send back dmesg when the system
> has been booted? It should show if the BIOS acks _PR3 or not.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> index 95855cb9d6fb..463eb2d69271 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -345,8 +345,15 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_support(void)
>  		capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT;
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(NULL, "\\_SB", &handle)))
>  		return;
> +
> +	acpi_handle_info(handle, "Supported caps: 0x%08x\n", capbuf[1]);
> +
>  	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_run_osc(handle, &context))) {
>  		u32 *capbuf_ret = context.ret.pointer;
> +
> +		acpi_handle_info(handle, "Acked caps: 0x%08x (_PR3: %s)\n", capbuf_ret[1],
> +				 capbuf_ret[1] & OSC_SB_PR3_SUPPORT ? "on" : "off");
> +
>  		if (context.ret.length > OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD) {
>  			osc_sb_apei_support_acked =
>  				capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT;
> --

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
index 95855cb9d6fb..463eb2d69271 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -345,8 +345,15 @@  static void acpi_bus_osc_support(void)
 		capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT;
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(NULL, "\\_SB", &handle)))
 		return;
+
+	acpi_handle_info(handle, "Supported caps: 0x%08x\n", capbuf[1]);
+
 	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_run_osc(handle, &context))) {
 		u32 *capbuf_ret = context.ret.pointer;
+
+		acpi_handle_info(handle, "Acked caps: 0x%08x (_PR3: %s)\n", capbuf_ret[1],
+				 capbuf_ret[1] & OSC_SB_PR3_SUPPORT ? "on" : "off");
+
 		if (context.ret.length > OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD) {
 			osc_sb_apei_support_acked =
 				capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT;