| Message ID | 20101111112329.GA6923@localhost |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > --- > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > index 1916164..b82fbd9 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > @@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ int ext4_alloc_da_blocks(struct inode *inode) > * doing I/O at all. > * > * We could call write_cache_pages(), and then redirty all of > - * the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writeback() but that > + * the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writepage() but that > * would be ugly in the extreme. So instead we would need to > * replicate parts of the code in the above functions, > * simplifying them becuase we wouldn't actually intend to This fix doesn't seem to be present in linux-next as of today, so I have picked it up. Thanks,
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 1916164..b82fbd9 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ int ext4_alloc_da_blocks(struct inode *inode) * doing I/O at all. * * We could call write_cache_pages(), and then redirty all of - * the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writeback() but that + * the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writepage() but that * would be ugly in the extreme. So instead we would need to * replicate parts of the code in the above functions, * simplifying them becuase we wouldn't actually intend to
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> --- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html