diff mbox

[v3] PCI/ACPI: xgene: Add ECAM quirk for X-Gene PCIe controller

Message ID 20161202233943.GF9903@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Bjorn Helgaas Dec. 2, 2016, 11:39 p.m. UTC
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:08:23PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Bjorn, Duc, Mark,
> 
> I switched my brain to the on mode and went and read some specs, and a few
> tables, so here's my 2 cents on this...
> 
> On 12/01/2016 06:22 PM, Duc Dang wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:10:10PM -0800, Duc Dang wrote:
> 
> >>>>> The SoC provide some number of RC bridges, each with a different base
> >>>>> for some mmio registers. Even if segment is legitimate in MCFG, there
> >>>>> is still a problem if a platform doesn't use the segment ordering
> >>>>> implied by the code. But the PNP0A03 _CRS does have this base address
> >>>>> as the first memory resource, so we could get it from there and not
> >>>>> have hard-coded addresses and implied ording in the quirk code.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm confused.  Doesn't the current code treat every item in PNP0A03
> >>>> _CRS as a window?  Do you mean the first resource is handled
> >>>> differently somehow?  The Consumer/Producer bit could allow us to do
> >>>> this by marking the RC MMIO space as "Consumer", but I didn't think
> >>>> that strategy was quite working yet.
> 
> Let's see if I summarized this correctly...
> 
> 1. The MMIO registers for the host bridge itself need to be described
>    somewhere, especially if we need to find those in a quirk and poke
>    them. Since those registers are very much part of the bridge device,
>    it makes sense for them to be in the _CRS for PNP0A08/PNP0A03.
> 
> 2. The address space covering these registers MUST be described as a
>    ResourceConsumer in order to avoid accidentally exposing them as
>    available for use by downstream devices on the PCI bus.
> 
> 3. The ACPI specification allows for resources of the type "Memory32Fixed".
>    This is a macro that doesn't have the notion of a producer or consumer.
>    HOWEVER various interpretations seem to be that this could/should
>    default to being interpreted as a consumed region.

I agree; I think that per spec, Memory24, Memory32, Memory32Fixed, IO,
and FixedIO should all be for consumed resources, not for bridge
windows, since they don't have the notion of producer.

I'm pretty sure there's x86 firmware in the field that uses these for
windows, so I think we have to accept that usage, at least on x86.

> 4. At one point, a regression was added to the kernel:
> 
>    63f1789ec716 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Ignore resources consumed by
>    host bridge itself")
> 
>    Which lead to a series on conversations about what should happen
>    for bridge resources (e.g. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/24/962 )
> 
> 5. This resulted in the following commit reverting point 4:
> 
>    2c62e8492ed7 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Make all resources except [io 0xcf8-0xcff]
>    available on PCI bus")
> 
>    Which also stated that:
> 
>    "This solution will also ease the way to consolidate ACPI PCI host
>     bridge common code from x86, ia64 and ARM64"
> 
> End of summary.
> 
> So it seems that generally there is an aversion to having bridge resources
> be described in this manner and you would like to require that they be
> described e.g. using QWordMemory with a ResourceConsumer type?

Per spec, we should ignore the Consumer/Producer bit in Word/DWord/QWord
descriptors.  In bridge devices on x86, I think we have to treat them as
producers (windows) because that's how they've been typically used.  

> BUT if we were to do that, it would break existing shipping systems since
> there are quirks out there that use this form to find the base CSR:
> 
>        if (acpi_res->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32) {
>                 fixed32 = &acpi_res->data.fixed_memory32;
>                 port->csr_base = ioremap(fixed32->address,
>                                          fixed32->address_length);
>                 return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
>         }

I think this is a valid usage of FixedMemory32 in terms of the spec.
Linux currently handles this as a window if it appears in a PNP0A03
device because some x86 firmware used it that way.

We might be able to handle it differently on arm64, e.g., by making an
arm64 version of pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources() that checks for
IORESOURCE_WINDOW.

> 2. What would happen if we had a difference policy on arm64 for such
>    resources. x86 has an "exception" for accessing the config space
>    using IO port 0xCF8-0xCFF (a fairly reasonable exception!) and
>    we can make the rules for a new platform (i.e. actually prescribe
>    exactly what the behavior is, rather than have it not be defined).
>    This is of course terrible in that existing BIOS vendors and so on
>    won't necessarily know this when working on ARM ACPI later on.

> Indeed. And in the case of m400, it is currently this in shipping systems:
> 
>                Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite,
>                     0x1F500000,         // Address Base
>                     0x00010000,         // Address Length
>                     )

> >>> [    0.822990] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x1f2b0000-0x1f2bffff]
> >>
> >> I think this is wrong.  The PCI core thinks [mem 0x1f2b0000-0x1f2bffff]
> >> is available for use by devices on bus 0000:00, but I think you're
> >> saying it is consumed by the bridge itself, not forwarded down to PCI.

I think this ASL is perfectly spec-compliant, and what's wrong is the
way Linux is interpreting it.

I'm not clear on what's terrible about idea 2.  I think it's basically
what I suggested above, i.e., something like the patch below, which I
think (hope) would keep us from thinking that region is a window.

Even without this patch, I don't think it's a show-stopper to have
Linux mistakenly thinking this region is routed to PCI, because the
driver does reserve it and the PCI core will never try to use it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Jon Masters Dec. 3, 2016, 12:33 a.m. UTC | #1
On 12/02/2016 06:39 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:08:23PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:

>> Let's see if I summarized this correctly...
>>
>> 1. The MMIO registers for the host bridge itself need to be described
>>    somewhere, especially if we need to find those in a quirk and poke
>>    them. Since those registers are very much part of the bridge device,
>>    it makes sense for them to be in the _CRS for PNP0A08/PNP0A03.
>>
>> 2. The address space covering these registers MUST be described as a
>>    ResourceConsumer in order to avoid accidentally exposing them as
>>    available for use by downstream devices on the PCI bus.
>>
>> 3. The ACPI specification allows for resources of the type "Memory32Fixed".
>>    This is a macro that doesn't have the notion of a producer or consumer.
>>    HOWEVER various interpretations seem to be that this could/should
>>    default to being interpreted as a consumed region.
> 
> I agree; I think that per spec, Memory24, Memory32, Memory32Fixed, IO,
> and FixedIO should all be for consumed resources, not for bridge
> windows, since they don't have the notion of producer.

Ok. If we ultimately codify this somewhere as the general Linux kernel
consensus (Rafael?) then we can also go and get the various ARM server
specs updated to reflect this in (for e.g.) reference firmware builds.

> I'm pretty sure there's x86 firmware in the field that uses these for
> windows, so I think we have to accept that usage, at least on x86.

Ok. I was pondering how to even go about finding that out, but even if
I scheduled a job across RH's infra to look, that would be a drop in
the bucket of possible machines that might be out there doing this.

<snip>

> Per spec, we should ignore the Consumer/Producer bit in Word/DWord/QWord
> descriptors.  In bridge devices on x86, I think we have to treat them as
> producers (windows) because that's how they've been typically used.  

Ok.

>> BUT if we were to do that, it would break existing shipping systems since
>> there are quirks out there that use this form to find the base CSR:
>>
>>        if (acpi_res->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32) {
>>                 fixed32 = &acpi_res->data.fixed_memory32;
>>                 port->csr_base = ioremap(fixed32->address,
>>                                          fixed32->address_length);
>>                 return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
>>         }
> 
> I think this is a valid usage of FixedMemory32 in terms of the spec.
> Linux currently handles this as a window if it appears in a PNP0A03
> device because some x86 firmware used it that way.
> 
> We might be able to handle it differently on arm64, e.g., by making an
> arm64 version of pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources() that checks for
> IORESOURCE_WINDOW.

This is something we should figure out the consensus on and codify.

>> 2. What would happen if we had a difference policy on arm64 for such
>>    resources. x86 has an "exception" for accessing the config space
>>    using IO port 0xCF8-0xCFF (a fairly reasonable exception!) and
>>    we can make the rules for a new platform (i.e. actually prescribe
>>    exactly what the behavior is, rather than have it not be defined).
>>    This is of course terrible in that existing BIOS vendors and so on
>>    won't necessarily know this when working on ARM ACPI later on.
> 
>> Indeed. And in the case of m400, it is currently this in shipping systems:
>>
>>                Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite,
>>                     0x1F500000,         // Address Base
>>                     0x00010000,         // Address Length
>>                     )
> 
>>>>> [    0.822990] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x1f2b0000-0x1f2bffff]
>>>>
>>>> I think this is wrong.  The PCI core thinks [mem 0x1f2b0000-0x1f2bffff]
>>>> is available for use by devices on bus 0000:00, but I think you're
>>>> saying it is consumed by the bridge itself, not forwarded down to PCI.
> 
> I think this ASL is perfectly spec-compliant, and what's wrong is the
> way Linux is interpreting it.
> 
> I'm not clear on what's terrible about idea 2.  I think it's basically
> what I suggested above, i.e., something like the patch below, which I
> think (hope) would keep us from thinking that region is a window.

I was guarded because I like harmony between architectures (where it
makes sense). But that said, there is nothing to prevent having a
different interpretation on ARM, as long as everyone agrees on it.

> Even without this patch, I don't think it's a show-stopper to have
> Linux mistakenly thinking this region is routed to PCI, because the
> driver does reserve it and the PCI core will never try to use it.

Ok. So are you happy with pulling in Duc's v4 patch and retaining
status quo on the bridge resources for 4.10? We can continue to
discuss this and ultimately set a direction for the spec, as well
as clean up existing and future designs (certainly the latter) to
ensure all possible resources used by a platform are described
and consumed correctly, and hopefully live with the slightly
odd little bit of address space eaten up for that RC CSR :)

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> index 8a177a1..a16fc8e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,19 @@ int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> +	struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
> +	int status;
> +
> +	status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
> +	resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
> +		if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW))
> +			resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +	}
> +	return status;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
>   * mapping.
> @@ -190,6 +203,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>  	}
>  
>  	root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info;
> +	root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources;
>  	root_ops->pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
>  	bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg);
>  	if (!bus)
> 

I can give this patch a quick boot test a bit later.

Jon.
Duc Dang Dec. 3, 2016, 7:06 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:08:23PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn, Duc, Mark,
> >
> > I switched my brain to the on mode and went and read some specs, and a few
> > tables, so here's my 2 cents on this...
> >
> > On 12/01/2016 06:22 PM, Duc Dang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:10:10PM -0800, Duc Dang wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> The SoC provide some number of RC bridges, each with a different base
> > >>>>> for some mmio registers. Even if segment is legitimate in MCFG, there
> > >>>>> is still a problem if a platform doesn't use the segment ordering
> > >>>>> implied by the code. But the PNP0A03 _CRS does have this base address
> > >>>>> as the first memory resource, so we could get it from there and not
> > >>>>> have hard-coded addresses and implied ording in the quirk code.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm confused.  Doesn't the current code treat every item in PNP0A03
> > >>>> _CRS as a window?  Do you mean the first resource is handled
> > >>>> differently somehow?  The Consumer/Producer bit could allow us to do
> > >>>> this by marking the RC MMIO space as "Consumer", but I didn't think
> > >>>> that strategy was quite working yet.
> >
> > Let's see if I summarized this correctly...
> >
> > 1. The MMIO registers for the host bridge itself need to be described
> >    somewhere, especially if we need to find those in a quirk and poke
> >    them. Since those registers are very much part of the bridge device,
> >    it makes sense for them to be in the _CRS for PNP0A08/PNP0A03.
> >
> > 2. The address space covering these registers MUST be described as a
> >    ResourceConsumer in order to avoid accidentally exposing them as
> >    available for use by downstream devices on the PCI bus.
> >
> > 3. The ACPI specification allows for resources of the type "Memory32Fixed".
> >    This is a macro that doesn't have the notion of a producer or consumer.
> >    HOWEVER various interpretations seem to be that this could/should
> >    default to being interpreted as a consumed region.
>
> I agree; I think that per spec, Memory24, Memory32, Memory32Fixed, IO,
> and FixedIO should all be for consumed resources, not for bridge
> windows, since they don't have the notion of producer.
>
> I'm pretty sure there's x86 firmware in the field that uses these for
> windows, so I think we have to accept that usage, at least on x86.
>
> > 4. At one point, a regression was added to the kernel:
> >
> >    63f1789ec716 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Ignore resources consumed by
> >    host bridge itself")
> >
> >    Which lead to a series on conversations about what should happen
> >    for bridge resources (e.g. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/24/962 )
> >
> > 5. This resulted in the following commit reverting point 4:
> >
> >    2c62e8492ed7 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Make all resources except [io 0xcf8-0xcff]
> >    available on PCI bus")
> >
> >    Which also stated that:
> >
> >    "This solution will also ease the way to consolidate ACPI PCI host
> >     bridge common code from x86, ia64 and ARM64"
> >
> > End of summary.
> >
> > So it seems that generally there is an aversion to having bridge resources
> > be described in this manner and you would like to require that they be
> > described e.g. using QWordMemory with a ResourceConsumer type?
>
> Per spec, we should ignore the Consumer/Producer bit in Word/DWord/QWord
> descriptors.  In bridge devices on x86, I think we have to treat them as
> producers (windows) because that's how they've been typically used.
>
> > BUT if we were to do that, it would break existing shipping systems since
> > there are quirks out there that use this form to find the base CSR:
> >
> >        if (acpi_res->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32) {
> >                 fixed32 = &acpi_res->data.fixed_memory32;
> >                 port->csr_base = ioremap(fixed32->address,
> >                                          fixed32->address_length);
> >                 return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
> >         }
>
> I think this is a valid usage of FixedMemory32 in terms of the spec.
> Linux currently handles this as a window if it appears in a PNP0A03
> device because some x86 firmware used it that way.
>
> We might be able to handle it differently on arm64, e.g., by making an
> arm64 version of pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources() that checks for
> IORESOURCE_WINDOW.
>
> > 2. What would happen if we had a difference policy on arm64 for such
> >    resources. x86 has an "exception" for accessing the config space
> >    using IO port 0xCF8-0xCFF (a fairly reasonable exception!) and
> >    we can make the rules for a new platform (i.e. actually prescribe
> >    exactly what the behavior is, rather than have it not be defined).
> >    This is of course terrible in that existing BIOS vendors and so on
> >    won't necessarily know this when working on ARM ACPI later on.
>
> > Indeed. And in the case of m400, it is currently this in shipping systems:
> >
> >                Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite,
> >                     0x1F500000,         // Address Base
> >                     0x00010000,         // Address Length
> >                     )
>
> > >>> [    0.822990] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x1f2b0000-0x1f2bffff]
> > >>
> > >> I think this is wrong.  The PCI core thinks [mem 0x1f2b0000-0x1f2bffff]
> > >> is available for use by devices on bus 0000:00, but I think you're
> > >> saying it is consumed by the bridge itself, not forwarded down to PCI.
>
> I think this ASL is perfectly spec-compliant, and what's wrong is the
> way Linux is interpreting it.
>
> I'm not clear on what's terrible about idea 2.  I think it's basically
> what I suggested above, i.e., something like the patch below, which I
> think (hope) would keep us from thinking that region is a window.
>
> Even without this patch, I don't think it's a show-stopper to have
> Linux mistakenly thinking this region is routed to PCI, because the
> driver does reserve it and the PCI core will never try to use it.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> index 8a177a1..a16fc8e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,19 @@ int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> +       struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
> +       int status;
> +
> +       status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
> +       resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
> +               if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW))
> +                       resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +       }
> +       return status;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
>   * mapping.
> @@ -190,6 +203,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>         }
>
>         root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info;
> +       root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources;
>         root_ops->pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
>         bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg);
>         if (!bus)

I tried your patch above with my X-Gene ECAM v4 patch on Mustang, here
is the kernel boot log and output of 'cat /proc/iomem'. The PCIe core
does not print the MMIO space as a window (which is expected per your
patch above).

Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
Linux version 4.9.0-rc1-17008-gf18738b-dirty
(dhdang@dhdang-workstation-01) (gcc version 4.9.3 20150218
(prerelease) (APM-8.0.10-le) ) #78 SMP PREEMPT Fri Dec 2 22:32:29 PST
2016
Boot CPU: AArch64 Processor [500f0001]
earlycon: uart8250 at MMIO32 0x000000001c020000 (options '')
bootconsole [uart8250] enabled
efi: Getting EFI parameters from FDT:
efi: EFI v2.40 by X-Gene Mustang Board EFI Oct 17 2016 13:54:05
efi:  ACPI=0x47fa700000  ACPI 2.0=0x47fa700014  SMBIOS
3.0=0x47fa9db000  ESRT=0x47ff006f18
esrt: Reserving ESRT space from 0x00000047ff006f18 to 0x00000047ff006f78.
cma: Reserved 256 MiB at 0x00000040f0000000
ACPI: Early table checksum verification disabled
ACPI: RSDP 0x00000047FA700014 000024 (v02 APM   )
ACPI: XSDT 0x00000047FA6F00E8 000084 (v01 APM    XGENE    00000003
 01000013)
ACPI: FACP 0x00000047FA6C0000 00010C (v05 APM    XGENE    00000003
INTL 20140724)
ACPI: DSDT 0x00000047FA6D0000 005922 (v05 APM    APM88xxx 00000001
INTL 20140724)
ACPI: DBG2 0x00000047FA6E0000 0000AA (v00 APMC0D XGENEDBG 00000000
INTL 20140724)
ACPI: GTDT 0x00000047FA6A0000 000060 (v02 APM    XGENE    00000001
INTL 20140724)
ACPI: MCFG 0x00000047FA690000 00003C (v01 APM    XGENE    00000002
INTL 20140724)
ACPI: SPCR 0x00000047FA680000 000050 (v02 APMC0D XGENESPC 00000000
INTL 20140724)
ACPI: SSDT 0x00000047FA670000 00002D (v02 APM    XGENE    00000001
INTL 20140724)
ACPI: BERT 0x00000047FA660000 000030 (v01 APM    XGENE    00000002
INTL 20140724)
ACPI: HEST 0x00000047FA650000 0002A8 (v01 APM    XGENE    00000002
INTL 20140724)
ACPI: APIC 0x00000047FA640000 0002A4 (v03 APM    XGENE    00000003
 01000013)
ACPI: SSDT 0x00000047FA630000 000063 (v02 REDHAT MACADDRS 00000001
 01000013)
ACPI: SSDT 0x00000047FA620000 000032 (v02 REDHAT UARTCLKS 00000001
 01000013)
ACPI: PCCT 0x00000047FA610000 000300 (v01 APM    XGENE    00000003
 01000013)
ACPI: SPCR: console: uart,mmio,0x1c020000,115200
On node 0 totalpages: 8388608
  DMA zone: 16384 pages used for memmap
  DMA zone: 0 pages reserved
  DMA zone: 1048576 pages, LIFO batch:31
  Normal zone: 114688 pages used for memmap
  Normal zone: 7340032 pages, LIFO batch:31
psci: is not implemented in ACPI.
percpu: Embedded 21 pages/cpu @ffff8007fff16000 s48000 r8192 d29824 u86016
pcpu-alloc: s48000 r8192 d29824 u86016 alloc=21*4096
pcpu-alloc: [0] 0 [0] 1 [0] 2 [0] 3 [0] 4 [0] 5 [0] 6 [0] 7
Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU0
Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on.  Total pages: 8257536
Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/apm-opensource/Image
console=ttyS0,115200 earlycon=uart8250,mmio32,0x1c020000 root=/dev/ram
rw netdev=eth0 debug acpi=force
log_buf_len individual max cpu contribution: 4096 bytes
log_buf_len total cpu_extra contributions: 28672 bytes
log_buf_len min size: 16384 bytes
log_buf_len: 65536 bytes
early log buf free: 12844(78%)
PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
Dentry cache hash table entries: 4194304 (order: 13, 33554432 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 2097152 (order: 12, 16777216 bytes)
software IO TLB [mem 0x40ebfff000-0x40effff000] (64MB) mapped at
[ffff8000ebfff000-ffff8000efffefff]
Memory: 32615844K/33554432K available (8700K kernel code, 870K rwdata,
3792K rodata, 1024K init, 284K bss, 676444K reserved, 262144K
cma-reserved)
Virtual kernel memory layout:
    modules : 0xffff000000000000 - 0xffff000008000000   (   128 MB)
    vmalloc : 0xffff000008000000 - 0xffff7dffbfff0000   (129022 GB)
      .text : 0xffff000008080000 - 0xffff000008900000   (  8704 KB)
    .rodata : 0xffff000008900000 - 0xffff000008cc0000   (  3840 KB)
      .init : 0xffff000008cc0000 - 0xffff000008dc0000   (  1024 KB)
      .data : 0xffff000008dc0000 - 0xffff000008e99a00   (   871 KB)
       .bss : 0xffff000008e99a00 - 0xffff000008ee0bc0   (   285 KB)
    fixed   : 0xffff7dfffe7fd000 - 0xffff7dfffec00000   (  4108 KB)
    PCI I/O : 0xffff7dfffee00000 - 0xffff7dffffe00000   (    16 MB)
    vmemmap : 0xffff7e0000000000 - 0xffff800000000000   (  2048 GB maximum)
              0xffff7e0000000000 - 0xffff7e0020000000   (   512 MB actual)
    memory  : 0xffff800000000000 - 0xffff800800000000   ( 32768 MB)
SLUB: HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=8, Nodes=1
Preemptible hierarchical RCU implementation.
Build-time adjustment of leaf fanout to 64.
RCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=64 to nr_cpu_ids=8.
RCU: Adjusting geometry for rcu_fanout_leaf=64, nr_cpu_ids=8
NR_IRQS:64 nr_irqs:64 0
GIC: Using split EOI/Deactivate mode
GICv3: No distributor detected at @ffff000008010000, giving up
arm_arch_timer: Architected cp15 timer(s) running at 50.00MHz (phys).
clocksource: arch_sys_counter: mask: 0xffffffffffffff max_cycles:
0xb8812736b, max_idle_ns: 440795202655 ns
sched_clock: 56 bits at 50MHz, resolution 20ns, wraps every 4398046511100ns
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer
frequency.. 100.00 BogoMIPS (lpj=200000)
pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301
ACPI: Core revision 20160831
ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.ET00._STA] (Node
ffff8007fa9fcdc0), AE_CTRL_PARSE_CONTINUE (20160831/psparse-543)
ACPI Error: Invalid zero thread count in method (20160831/dsmethod-796)
ACPI Error: Invalid OwnerId: 0x00 (20160831/utownerid-186)
ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.ET01._STA] (Node
ffff8007fa9fe078), AE_CTRL_PARSE_CONTINUE (20160831/psparse-543)
ACPI Error: Invalid zero thread count in method (20160831/dsmethod-796)
ACPI Error: Invalid OwnerId: 0x00 (20160831/utownerid-186)
ACPI: 4 ACPI AML tables successfully acquired and loaded

Security Framework initialized
Mount-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)
Mountpoint-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)
ASID allocator initialised with 65536 entries
Remapping and enabling EFI services.
  EFI remap 0x0000000010510000 => 0000000020000000
  EFI remap 0x0000000010548000 => 0000000020018000
  EFI remap 0x0000000017000000 => 0000000020020000
  EFI remap 0x000000001c025000 => 0000000020035000
  EFI remap 0x00000047fa5a0000 => 0000000020040000
  EFI remap 0x00000047fa5b0000 => 0000000020050000
  EFI remap 0x00000047fa5c0000 => 0000000020060000
  EFI remap 0x00000047fa710000 => 0000000020070000
  EFI remap 0x00000047fa730000 => 0000000020090000
  EFI remap 0x00000047fa790000 => 00000000200f0000
  EFI remap 0x00000047fa7a0000 => 0000000020100000
  EFI remap 0x00000047fa9a0000 => 0000000020300000
  EFI remap 0x00000047fa9b0000 => 0000000020310000
  EFI remap 0x00000047ff9a0000 => 0000000020330000
  EFI remap 0x00000047ff9c0000 => 0000000020340000
Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU1
CPU1: Booted secondary processor [500f0001]
Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU2
CPU2: Booted secondary processor [500f0001]
Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU3
CPU3: Booted secondary processor [500f0001]
Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU4
CPU4: Booted secondary processor [500f0001]
Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU5
CPU5: Booted secondary processor [500f0001]
Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU6
CPU6: Booted secondary processor [500f0001]
Detected PIPT I-cache on CPU7
CPU7: Booted secondary processor [500f0001]
Brought up 8 CPUs
SMP: Total of 8 processors activated.
CPU features: detected feature: 32-bit EL0 Support
CPU: All CPU(s) started at EL2
devtmpfs: initialized
SMBIOS 3.0.0 present.
clocksource: jiffies: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff,
max_idle_ns: 7645041785100000 ns
pinctrl core: initialized pinctrl subsystem
NET: Registered protocol family 16
cpuidle: using governor menu
vdso: 2 pages (1 code @ ffff000008907000, 1 data @ ffff000008dc4000)
hw-breakpoint: found 4 breakpoint and 4 watchpoint registers.
DMA: preallocated 256 KiB pool for atomic allocations
ACPI: bus type PCI registered
Serial: AMBA PL011 UART driver
HugeTLB registered 2 MB page size, pre-allocated 0 pages
ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Using GIC for interrupt routing
ACPI: MCFG table detected, 1 entries
ACPI: Power Resource [SCVR] (on)
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-ff])
acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI]
acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS now controls [PCIeHotplug PME AER PCIeCapability]
acpi PNP0A08:00: MCFG quirk: ECAM at [mem 0xe0d0000000-0xe0dfffffff]
for [bus 00-ff] with xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops
acpi PNP0A08:00: [Firmware Bug]: ECAM area [mem
0xe0d0000000-0xe0dfffffff] not reserved in ACPI namespace
acpi PNP0A08:00: ECAM at [mem 0xe0d0000000-0xe0dfffffff] for [bus 00-ff]
Remapped I/O 0x000000e010000000 to [io  0x0000-0xffff window]
PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xffff window] (bus
address [0x10000000-0x1000ffff])
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xe040000000-0xe07fffffff
window] (bus address [0x40000000-0x7fffffff])
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xf000000000-0xffffffffff window]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: [10e8:e004] type 01 class 0x060400
pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1 D2
pci 0000:01:00.0: [15b3:1003] type 00 class 0x020000
pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xe040000000-0xe0400fffff 64bit]
pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x18: [mem 0xe042000000-0xe043ffffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x30: [mem 0xfff00000-0xffffffff pref]
pci_bus 0000:00: on NUMA node 0
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 15: assigned [mem 0xf000000000-0xf001ffffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xe040000000-0xe0401fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0xf000000000-0xf001ffffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xe040000000-0xe0400fffff 64bit]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xe040100000-0xe0401fffff pref]
pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0xe040000000-0xe0401fffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0xf000000000-0xf001ffffff 64bit pref]
vgaarb: loaded
SCSI subsystem initialized
libata version 3.00 loaded.
ACPI: bus type USB registered
usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs
usbcore: registered new interface driver hub
usbcore: registered new device driver usb
pps_core: LinuxPPS API ver. 1 registered
pps_core: Software ver. 5.3.6 - Copyright 2005-2007 Rodolfo Giometti
<giometti@linux.it>
PTP clock support registered
Registered efivars operations
Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Initialized.
clocksource: Switched to clocksource arch_sys_counter
VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.6.0
VFS: Dquot-cache hash table entries: 512 (order 0, 4096 bytes)
pnp: PnP ACPI init
pnp: PnP ACPI: found 0 devices
NET: Registered protocol family 2
TCP established hash table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes)
TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 262144 bind 65536)
UDP hash table entries: 16384 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)
UDP-Lite hash table entries: 16384 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)
NET: Registered protocol family 1
RPC: Registered named UNIX socket transport module.
RPC: Registered udp transport module.
RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module.
PCI: CLS 0 bytes, default 128
Unpacking initramfs...
Freeing initrd memory: 14676K (ffff8007f8767000 - ffff8007f95bc000)
kvm [1]: 8-bit VMID
kvm [1]: IDMAP page: 4000af5000
kvm [1]: HYP VA range: 800000000000:ffffffffffff
kvm [1]: Hyp mode initialized successfully
kvm [1]: vgic-v2@780cf000
kvm [1]: vgic interrupt IRQ1
kvm [1]: virtual timer IRQ4
futex hash table entries: 2048 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
audit: initializing netlink subsys (disabled)
audit: type=2000 audit(4.120:1): initialized
workingset: timestamp_bits=46 max_order=23 bucket_order=0
squashfs: version 4.0 (2009/01/31) Phillip Lougher
NFS: Registering the id_resolver key type
Key type id_resolver registered
Key type id_legacy registered
nfs4filelayout_init: NFSv4 File Layout Driver Registering...
9p: Installing v9fs 9p2000 file system support
Block layer SCSI generic (bsg) driver version 0.4 loaded (major 247)
io scheduler noop registered
io scheduler cfq registered (default)
libphy: mdio_driver_register: phy-bcm-ns2-pci
xgene-gpio APMC0D14:00: X-Gene GPIO driver registered.
aer 0000:00:00.0:pcie002: service driver aer loaded
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: Signaling PME through PCIe PME interrupt
pci 0000:01:00.0: Signaling PME through PCIe PME interrupt
pcie_pme 0000:00:00.0:pcie001: service driver pcie_pme loaded
input: Power Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/PNP0C0C:00/input/input0
ACPI: Power Button [PWRB]
xenfs: not registering filesystem on non-xen platform
Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing disabled
console [ttyS0] disabled
APMC0D08:00: ttyS0 at MMIO 0x1c020000 (irq = 22, base_baud = 3125000)
is a U6_16550A
console [ttyS0] enabled
bootconsole [uart8250] disabled
APMC0D08:01: ttyS1 at MMIO 0x1c021000 (irq = 23, base_baud = 3125000)
is a U6_16550A
SuperH (H)SCI(F) driver initialized
msm_serial: driver initialized
Failed to find cpu0 device node
Unable to detect cache hierarchy from DT for CPU 0
loop: module loaded
hisi_sas: driver version v1.6
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:00: skip clock and PHY initialization
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:00: controller can't do NCQ, turning off CAP_NCQ
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:00: AHCI 0001.0300 32 slots 2 ports 6 Gbps 0x3
impl platform mode
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:00: flags: 64bit sntf pm only pmp fbs pio slum part ccc
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:00: port 0 is not capable of FBS
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:00: port 1 is not capable of FBS
scsi host0: xgene-ahci
scsi host1: xgene-ahci
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0x1a400000-0x1a400fff] port 0x100 irq 27
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0x1a400000-0x1a400fff] port 0x180 irq 27
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:01: skip clock and PHY initialization
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:01: controller can't do NCQ, turning off CAP_NCQ
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:01: AHCI 0001.0300 32 slots 2 ports 6 Gbps 0x3
impl platform mode
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:01: flags: 64bit sntf pm only pmp fbs pio slum part ccc
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:01: port 0 is not capable of FBS
xgene-ahci APMC0D0D:01: port 1 is not capable of FBS
scsi host2: xgene-ahci
scsi host3: xgene-ahci
ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0x1a800000-0x1a800fff] port 0x100 irq 28
ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0x1a800000-0x1a800fff] port 0x180 irq 28
libphy: APM X-Gene MDIO bus: probed
libphy: Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6
tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
xgene-enet APMC0D05:00: clocks have been setup already
xgene-enet APMC0D30:00: clocks have been setup already
ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 4300)
ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 4300)
xgene-enet APMC0D30:01: clocks have been setup already
xgene-enet APMC0D31:00: clocks have been setup already
e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 3.2.6-k
e1000e: Copyright(c) 1999 - 2015 Intel Corporation.
igb: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver - version 5.4.0-k
igb: Copyright (c) 2007-2014 Intel Corporation.
igbvf: Intel(R) Gigabit Virtual Function Network Driver - version 2.4.0-k
igbvf: Copyright (c) 2009 - 2012 Intel Corporation.
sky2: driver version 1.30
mlx4_core: Mellanox ConnectX core driver v2.2-1 (Feb, 2014)
ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 4300)
mlx4_core: Initializing 0000:01:00.0
ata4: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 4300)
ata4.00: ATA-8: SDLFOCAM-800G-1HA1, ZZ37RE92, max UDMA/133
ata4.00: 1562824368 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
ata4.00: configured for UDMA/133
scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access     ATA      SDLFOCAM-800G-1H RE92 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] 1562824368 512-byte logical blocks: (800 GB/745 GiB)
sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] 4096-byte physical blocks
sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't
support DPO or FUA
 sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected,
type=Physical Layer, id=0000(Receiver ID)
pcieport 0000:00:00.0:   device [10e8:e004] error status/mask=00000041/00002001
pcieport 0000:00:00.0:    [ 6] Bad TLP
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: Corrected error received: id=0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: can't find device of ID0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: Corrected error received: id=0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: can't find device of ID0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: Corrected error received: id=0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected,
type=Physical Layer, id=0000(Transmitter ID)
pcieport 0000:00:00.0:   device [10e8:e004] error status/mask=00001041/00002001
pcieport 0000:00:00.0:    [ 6] Bad TLP
pcieport 0000:00:00.0:    [12] Replay Timer Timeout
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: can't find device of ID0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: Corrected error received: id=0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: can't find device of ID0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: Corrected error received: id=0000
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: can't find device of ID0000
mlx4_core 0000:01:00.0: PCIe link speed is 8.0GT/s, device supports 8.0GT/s
mlx4_core 0000:01:00.0: PCIe link width is x8, device supports x8
mlx4_en: Mellanox ConnectX HCA Ethernet driver v2.2-1 (Feb 2014)
mlx4_en 0000:01:00.0: Activating port:1
mlx4_en: 0000:01:00.0: Port 1: Using 64 TX rings
mlx4_en: 0000:01:00.0: Port 1: Using 4 RX rings
mlx4_en: 0000:01:00.0: Port 1:   frag:0 - size:1522 prefix:0 stride:1536
mlx4_en: 0000:01:00.0: Port 1: Initializing port
mlx4_en 0000:01:00.0: registered PHC clock
mlx4_en 0000:01:00.0: Activating port:2
mlx4_en: 0000:01:00.0: Port 2: Using 64 TX rings
mlx4_en: 0000:01:00.0: Port 2: Using 4 RX rings
mlx4_en: 0000:01:00.0: Port 2:   frag:0 - size:1522 prefix:0 stride:1536
mlx4_en: 0000:01:00.0: Port 2: Initializing port
VFIO - User Level meta-driver version: 0.3
ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver
ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver
ehci-platform: EHCI generic platform driver
ehci-exynos: EHCI EXYNOS driver
ehci-msm: Qualcomm On-Chip EHCI Host Controller
ohci_hcd: USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver
ohci-pci: OHCI PCI platform driver
ohci-platform: OHCI generic platform driver
ohci-exynos: OHCI EXYNOS driver
xhci-hcd: probe of xhci-hcd.0.auto failed with error -5
xhci-hcd: probe of xhci-hcd.1.auto failed with error -5
usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage
mousedev: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
rtc-efi rtc-efi: rtc core: registered rtc-efi as rtc0
i2c /dev entries driver
sdhci: Secure Digital Host Controller Interface driver
sdhci: Copyright(c) Pierre Ossman
Synopsys Designware Multimedia Card Interface Driver
sdhci-pltfm: SDHCI platform and OF driver helper
ledtrig-cpu: registered to indicate activity on CPUs
usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
usbhid: USB HID core driver
NET: Registered protocol family 17
9pnet: Installing 9P2000 support
Key type dns_resolver registered
registered taskstats version 1
rtc-efi rtc-efi: setting system clock to 2016-12-03 06:49:10 UTC (1480747750)
ALSA device list:
  No soundcards found.
Freeing unused kernel memory: 1024K (ffff800000ec0000 - ffff800000fc0000)
udevd[1484]: starting version 182
random: fast init done
[root@(none) ~]# cat /proc/io mem
10000000-103fffff : APMC0D05:00
10520000-10523fff : APMC0D18:00
10524000-10527fff : APMC0D17:00
10540000-10547fff : APMC0D01:00
1054a000-1054a0ff : APMC0D43:00
  1054a000-1054a01b : APMC0D41:00
17001000-170013ff : APMC0D15:00
1701c000-1701cfff : APMC0D14:00
17020000-1702d0ff : APMC0D05:00
  17020000-1702d0ff : APMC0D65:00
    17020000-1702d0ff : APMC0D3E:00
      17020000-1702d0ff : APMC0D65:00
17030000-1703ffff : APMC0D05:00
18000000-183fffff : APMC0D31:00
  18000000-183fffff : APMC0D6A:00
19000000-19007fff : 808622B7:00
1900c100-190fffff : 808622B7:00
  1900c100-190fffff : 808622B7:00
19800000-19807fff : 808622B7:01
1980c100-198fffff : 808622B7:01
  1980c100-198fffff : 808622B7:01
1a400000-1a400fff : APMC0D0D:00
  1a400000-1a400fff : APMC0D0D:00
1a800000-1a800fff : APMC0D0D:01
  1a800000-1a800fff : APMC0D0D:01
1b000000-1b3fffff : APMC0D43:00
  1b000000-1b007fff : APMC0D30:01
    1b000000-1b001fff : APMC0D30:00
  1b00a000-1b00bfff : APMC0D41:00
1c000000-1c0000ff : APMC0D0C:00
1c020000-1c0200ff : APMC0D08:00
  1c020000-1c02001f : serial
1c021000-1c0210ff : APMC0D08:01
  1c021000-1c02101f : serial
1c024000-1c024fff : APMC0D07:00
  1c024000-1c024fff : APMC0D07:00
1f200000-1f20ffff : APMC0D41:00
  1f200000-1f20ffff : APMC0D43:00
    1f200000-1f20c2ff : APMC0D30:01
      1f200000-1f20c2ff : APMC0D30:00
1f210000-1f21d0ff : APMC0D30:00
  1f210030-1f21d0ff : APMC0D30:01
1f220000-1f220fff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f220000-1f220fff : APMC0D0D:00
1f227000-1f227fff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f227000-1f227fff : APMC0D0D:00
1f22d000-1f22dfff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f22d000-1f22dfff : APMC0D0D:00
1f22e000-1f22efff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f22e000-1f22efff : APMC0D0D:00
1f230000-1f230fff : APMC0D0D:01
  1f230000-1f230fff : APMC0D0D:01
1f23d000-1f23dfff : APMC0D0D:01
  1f23d000-1f23dfff : APMC0D0D:01
1f23e000-1f23efff : APMC0D0D:01
  1f23e000-1f23efff : APMC0D0D:01
1f250000-1f25ffff : APMC0D41:00
1f270000-1f27ffff : APMC0D43:00
1f280000-1f28ffff : 808622B7:00
1f290000-1f29ffff : 808622B7:01
1f2a0000-1f2a0fff : APMC0D0C:00
1f2b0000-1f2bffff : PNP0A08:00
1f600000-1f60ffff : APMC0D31:00
  1f600000-1f60ffff : APMC0D6A:00
1f610000-1f61ffff : APMC0D31:00
78810000-78810fff : APMC0D5C:00
79000000-798fffff : APMC0D0E:00
7e200000-7e200fff : APMC0D5C:00
7e610000-7e610fff : APMC0D5D:00
7e700000-7e700fff : APMC0D5C:00
7e710000-7e710fff : APMC0D5F:00
7e720000-7e720fff : APMC0D5C:00
7e730000-7e730fff : APMC0D5F:01
7e810000-7e810fff : APMC0D60:00
7e850000-7e850fff : APMC0D60:01
7e890000-7e890fff : APMC0D60:02
7e8d0000-7e8d0fff : APMC0D60:03
7e940000-7e940fff : APMC0D5E:00
4000000000-40001fffff : reserved
4000200000-47fa59ffff : System RAM
  4000280000-4000ebffff : Kernel code
  4000fc0000-40010e6fff : Kernel data
47fa5a0000-47fa5cffff : reserved
47fa5d0000-47fa5ddfff : System RAM
47fa5de000-47fa9cffff : reserved
47fa9d0000-47fa9d9fff : System RAM
47fa9da000-47fa9dbfff : reserved
47fa9dc000-47ff99ffff : System RAM
47ff9a0000-47ff9affff : reserved
47ff9b0000-47ff9bffff : System RAM
47ff9c0000-47ff9effff : reserved
47ff9f0000-47ffffffff : System RAM
e040000000-e07fffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
  e040000000-e0401fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
    e040000000-e0400fffff : 0000:01:00.0
      e040000000-e0400fffff : mlx4_core
    e040100000-e0401fffff : 0000:01:00.0
e0d0000000-e0dfffffff : PCI ECAM
f000000000-ffffffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
  f000000000-f001ffffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
    f000000000-f001ffffff : 0000:01:00.0
      f000000000-f001ffffff : mlx4_core
[root@(none) ~]#

Regards,
Duc Dang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Bjorn Helgaas Dec. 5, 2016, 9:20 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:06:30PM -0800, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:

> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > index 8a177a1..a16fc8e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > @@ -114,6 +114,19 @@ int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> > +{
> > +       struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
> > +       int status;
> > +
> > +       status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
> > +       resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
> > +               if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW))
> > +                       resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> > +       }
> > +       return status;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
> >   * mapping.
> > @@ -190,6 +203,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> >         }
> >
> >         root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info;
> > +       root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources;
> >         root_ops->pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
> >         bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg);
> >         if (!bus)
> 
> I tried your patch above with my X-Gene ECAM v4 patch on Mustang, here
> is the kernel boot log and output of 'cat /proc/iomem'. The PCIe core
> does not print the MMIO space as a window (which is expected per your
> patch above).

Thanks!

> ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-ff])
> acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI]
> acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS now controls [PCIeHotplug PME AER PCIeCapability]
> acpi PNP0A08:00: MCFG quirk: ECAM at [mem 0xe0d0000000-0xe0dfffffff] for [bus 00-ff] with xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops
> acpi PNP0A08:00: [Firmware Bug]: ECAM area [mem 0xe0d0000000-0xe0dfffffff] not reserved in ACPI namespace
> acpi PNP0A08:00: ECAM at [mem 0xe0d0000000-0xe0dfffffff] for [bus 00-ff]
> Remapped I/O 0x000000e010000000 to [io  0x0000-0xffff window]
> PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xffff window] (bus address [0x10000000-0x1000ffff])
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xe040000000-0xe07fffffff window] (bus address [0x40000000-0x7fffffff])
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xf000000000-0xffffffffff window]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]

Yup, no bridge register space here; that's good.  I assume the bridge
registers are at [mem 0x1f2b0000-0x1f2bffff] as shown in /proc/iomem
below.

> [root@(none) ~]# cat /proc/io mem
> ...
> 19000000-19007fff : 808622B7:00
> 1900c100-190fffff : 808622B7:00
>   1900c100-190fffff : 808622B7:00
> 19800000-19807fff : 808622B7:01
> 1980c100-198fffff : 808622B7:01
>   1980c100-198fffff : 808622B7:01
> ...
> 1f280000-1f28ffff : 808622B7:00
> 1f290000-1f29ffff : 808622B7:01

I'm curious what these "808622B7" devices are.  Per ACPI 6.0, sec
6.1.5, that looks like a PCI vendor ID, which I guess is a valid ACPI
ID.  But these resources don't seem to have any connection with PCI
(they're not in any of the host bridge apertures).

> 1f2b0000-1f2bffff : PNP0A08:00

Looks like the bridge register space; good.

> e040000000-e07fffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
>   e040000000-e0401fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
>     e040000000-e0400fffff : 0000:01:00.0
>       e040000000-e0400fffff : mlx4_core
>     e040100000-e0401fffff : 0000:01:00.0

> e0d0000000-e0dfffffff : PCI ECAM

This region should be described in either a PNP0C02 device or (if we
decide we can allow "consumer" descriptors) the PNP0A08 device.  I
assume you'll fix that in a future firmware release.

But I think this reservation from pci_ecam_create() is good enough for
now.

> f000000000-ffffffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
>   f000000000-f001ffffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
>     f000000000-f001ffffff : 0000:01:00.0
>       f000000000-f001ffffff : mlx4_core
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Bjorn Helgaas Dec. 5, 2016, 9:21 p.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:33:46PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 12/02/2016 06:39 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:08:23PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> 
> >> Let's see if I summarized this correctly...
> >>
> >> 1. The MMIO registers for the host bridge itself need to be described
> >>    somewhere, especially if we need to find those in a quirk and poke
> >>    them. Since those registers are very much part of the bridge device,
> >>    it makes sense for them to be in the _CRS for PNP0A08/PNP0A03.
> >>
> >> 2. The address space covering these registers MUST be described as a
> >>    ResourceConsumer in order to avoid accidentally exposing them as
> >>    available for use by downstream devices on the PCI bus.
> >>
> >> 3. The ACPI specification allows for resources of the type "Memory32Fixed".
> >>    This is a macro that doesn't have the notion of a producer or consumer.
> >>    HOWEVER various interpretations seem to be that this could/should
> >>    default to being interpreted as a consumed region.
> > 
> > I agree; I think that per spec, Memory24, Memory32, Memory32Fixed, IO,
> > and FixedIO should all be for consumed resources, not for bridge
> > windows, since they don't have the notion of producer.
> 
> Ok. If we ultimately codify this somewhere as the general Linux kernel
> consensus (Rafael?) then we can also go and get the various ARM server
> specs updated to reflect this in (for e.g.) reference firmware builds.
> 
> > I'm pretty sure there's x86 firmware in the field that uses these for
> > windows, so I think we have to accept that usage, at least on x86.
> 
> Ok. I was pondering how to even go about finding that out, but even if
> I scheduled a job across RH's infra to look, that would be a drop in
> the bucket of possible machines that might be out there doing this.

Hmmm, when researching this, I thought I came across a change
specifically for a machine that used Memory32Fixed this way, but I
can't find it now.

The only thing I did find was some old experiments with Windows that
showed it interpreting a Memory32Fixed region as a window and putting
PCI devices in it: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15817
But that was a synthetic example with qemu, not a real machine in the
field.

> > Even without this patch, I don't think it's a show-stopper to have
> > Linux mistakenly thinking this region is routed to PCI, because the
> > driver does reserve it and the PCI core will never try to use it.
> 
> Ok. So are you happy with pulling in Duc's v4 patch and retaining
> status quo on the bridge resources for 4.10?

Yes, I think it looks good.  I'll finish packaging things up and
repost the current series.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Duc Dang Dec. 5, 2016, 9:40 p.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:06:30PM -0800, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> > index 8a177a1..a16fc8e 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> > @@ -114,6 +114,19 @@ int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>> >         return 0;
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
>> > +       int status;
>> > +
>> > +       status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
>> > +       resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
>> > +               if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW))
>> > +                       resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
>> > +       }
>> > +       return status;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> >  /*
>> >   * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
>> >   * mapping.
>> > @@ -190,6 +203,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>> >         }
>> >
>> >         root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info;
>> > +       root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources;
>> >         root_ops->pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
>> >         bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg);
>> >         if (!bus)
>>
>> I tried your patch above with my X-Gene ECAM v4 patch on Mustang, here
>> is the kernel boot log and output of 'cat /proc/iomem'. The PCIe core
>> does not print the MMIO space as a window (which is expected per your
>> patch above).
>
> Thanks!
>
>> ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-ff])
>> acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI]
>> acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS now controls [PCIeHotplug PME AER PCIeCapability]
>> acpi PNP0A08:00: MCFG quirk: ECAM at [mem 0xe0d0000000-0xe0dfffffff] for [bus 00-ff] with xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops
>> acpi PNP0A08:00: [Firmware Bug]: ECAM area [mem 0xe0d0000000-0xe0dfffffff] not reserved in ACPI namespace
>> acpi PNP0A08:00: ECAM at [mem 0xe0d0000000-0xe0dfffffff] for [bus 00-ff]
>> Remapped I/O 0x000000e010000000 to [io  0x0000-0xffff window]
>> PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xffff window] (bus address [0x10000000-0x1000ffff])
>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xe040000000-0xe07fffffff window] (bus address [0x40000000-0x7fffffff])
>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xf000000000-0xffffffffff window]
>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
>
> Yup, no bridge register space here; that's good.  I assume the bridge
> registers are at [mem 0x1f2b0000-0x1f2bffff] as shown in /proc/iomem
> below.

Yes,  the bridge registers are at [mem 0x1f2b0000-0x1f2bffff].

>
>> [root@(none) ~]# cat /proc/io mem
>> ...
>> 19000000-19007fff : 808622B7:00
>> 1900c100-190fffff : 808622B7:00
>>   1900c100-190fffff : 808622B7:00
>> 19800000-19807fff : 808622B7:01
>> 1980c100-198fffff : 808622B7:01
>>   1980c100-198fffff : 808622B7:01
>> ...
>> 1f280000-1f28ffff : 808622B7:00
>> 1f290000-1f29ffff : 808622B7:01
>
> I'm curious what these "808622B7" devices are.  Per ACPI 6.0, sec
> 6.1.5, that looks like a PCI vendor ID, which I guess is a valid ACPI
> ID.  But these resources don't seem to have any connection with PCI
> (they're not in any of the host bridge apertures).

These are DesignWare USB 3.0 controllers (DWC3). The ACPI ID is
defined in drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c.
>
>> 1f2b0000-1f2bffff : PNP0A08:00
>
> Looks like the bridge register space; good.

Yes, it is.

>
>> e040000000-e07fffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
>>   e040000000-e0401fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
>>     e040000000-e0400fffff : 0000:01:00.0
>>       e040000000-e0400fffff : mlx4_core
>>     e040100000-e0401fffff : 0000:01:00.0
>
>> e0d0000000-e0dfffffff : PCI ECAM
>
> This region should be described in either a PNP0C02 device or (if we
> decide we can allow "consumer" descriptors) the PNP0A08 device.  I
> assume you'll fix that in a future firmware release.

Yes, future firmware will have PNP0C02 node that describes this ECAM
space (or a new resource in PNP0A08 if we use 'consumer' descriptor).

>
> But I think this reservation from pci_ecam_create() is good enough for
> now.
>
>> f000000000-ffffffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
>>   f000000000-f001ffffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
>>     f000000000-f001ffffff : 0000:01:00.0
>>       f000000000-f001ffffff : mlx4_core
Regards,
Duc Dang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jon Masters Dec. 5, 2016, 11:31 p.m. UTC | #6
On 12/05/2016 04:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:06:30PM -0800, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>>> index 8a177a1..a16fc8e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>>> @@ -114,6 +114,19 @@ int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
>>> +{
>>> +       struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
>>> +       int status;
>>> +
>>> +       status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
>>> +       resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
>>> +               if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW))
>>> +                       resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
>>> +       }
>>> +       return status;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  /*
>>>   * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
>>>   * mapping.
>>> @@ -190,6 +203,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>>>         }
>>>
>>>         root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info;
>>> +       root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources;
>>>         root_ops->pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
>>>         bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg);
>>>         if (!bus)
>>
>> I tried your patch above with my X-Gene ECAM v4 patch on Mustang, here
>> is the kernel boot log and output of 'cat /proc/iomem'. The PCIe core
>> does not print the MMIO space as a window (which is expected per your
>> patch above).
> 
> Thanks!

...and just for the record, here it is on HPE ProLiant m400 (Moonshot),
with the same result that the region is no longer claimed as PCI space
(it - 1f500000 - is now showing as being owned by PNP0A08:00):

# cat /proc/iomem 
10520000-10523fff : APMC0D18:00
  10520000-10523fff : APMC0D18:00
10524000-10527fff : APMC0D17:00
10540000-1054a0ff : APMC0D01:00
  10546000-10546fff : APMC0D50:00
  1054a000-1054a00f : APMC0D12:03
    1054a000-1054a00f : APMC0D12:02
      1054a000-1054a00f : APMC0D12:01
        1054a000-1054a00f : APMC0D12:00
17000000-17000fff : APMC0D01:00
17001000-17001fff : APMC0D01:00
  17001000-170013ff : APMC0D15:00
    17001000-170013ff : APMC0D15:00
1701c000-1701cfff : APMC0D14:00
1a800000-1a800fff : APMC0D0D:00
  1a800000-1a800fff : APMC0D0D:00
1c000200-1c0002ff : APMC0D06:00
1c021000-1c0210ff : APMC0D08:00
  1c021000-1c02101f : serial
1c024000-1c024fff : APMC0D07:00
1f230000-1f230fff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f230000-1f230fff : APMC0D0D:00
1f23d000-1f23dfff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f23d000-1f23dfff : APMC0D0D:00
1f23e000-1f23efff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f23e000-1f23efff : APMC0D0D:00
1f2a0000-1f31ffff : APMC0D06:00
1f500000-1f50ffff : PNP0A08:00
78800000-78800fff : APMC0D13:00
  78800000-78800fff : APMC0D12:03
    78800000-78800fff : APMC0D12:02
      78800000-78800fff : APMC0D12:01
        78800000-78800fff : APMC0D12:00
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D11:00
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D10:03
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D10:02
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D10:01
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D10:00
79000000-798fffff : APMC0D0E:00
7c000000-7c1fffff : APMC0D12:00
7c200000-7c3fffff : APMC0D12:01
7c400000-7c5fffff : APMC0D12:02
7c600000-7c7fffff : APMC0D12:03
7e000000-7e000fff : APMC0D13:00
7e200000-7e200fff : APMC0D10:03
  7e200000-7e200fff : APMC0D10:02
    7e200000-7e200fff : APMC0D10:01
      7e200000-7e200fff : APMC0D10:00
7e600000-7e600fff : APMC0D11:00
7e700000-7e700fff : APMC0D10:03
  7e700000-7e700fff : APMC0D10:02
    7e700000-7e700fff : APMC0D10:01
      7e700000-7e700fff : APMC0D10:00
7e720000-7e720fff : APMC0D10:03
  7e720000-7e720fff : APMC0D10:02
    7e720000-7e720fff : APMC0D10:01
      7e720000-7e720fff : APMC0D10:00
7e800000-7e800fff : APMC0D10:00
7e840000-7e840fff : APMC0D10:01
7e880000-7e880fff : APMC0D10:02
7e8c0000-7e8c0fff : APMC0D10:03
7e930000-7e930fff : APMC0D13:00
4000000000-4001ffffff : System RAM
  4000080000-4000c3ffff : Kernel code
  4000db0000-400165ffff : Kernel data
40023a0000-4ff733ffff : System RAM
4ff7340000-4ff77cffff : reserved
4ff77d0000-4ff79cffff : System RAM
4ff79d0000-4ff7e7ffff : reserved
4ff7e80000-4ff7e8ffff : System RAM
4ff7e90000-4ff7efffff : reserved
4ff7f10000-4ff800ffff : reserved
4ff8010000-4fffffffff : System RAM
a020000000-a03fffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
  a020000000-a0201fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
    a020000000-a0200fffff : 0000:01:00.0
      a020000000-a0200fffff : mlx4_core
    a020100000-a0201fffff : 0000:01:00.0
a060000000-a07fffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
a0d0000000-a0dfffffff : PCI ECAM
a110000000-a14fffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
  a110000000-a121ffffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
    a110000000-a111ffffff : 0000:01:00.0
      a110000000-a111ffffff : mlx4_core
    a112000000-a121ffffff : 0000:01:00.0

Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Jon Masters Dec. 6, 2016, 7:46 p.m. UTC | #7
On 12/05/2016 04:21 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:33:46PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:

>>> Even without this patch, I don't think it's a show-stopper to have
>>> Linux mistakenly thinking this region is routed to PCI, because the
>>> driver does reserve it and the PCI core will never try to use it.
>>
>> Ok. So are you happy with pulling in Duc's v4 patch and retaining
>> status quo on the bridge resources for 4.10?
> 
> Yes, I think it looks good.  I'll finish packaging things up and
> repost the current series.

Ok, great. So you're still pretty confident we'll have "out of the box"
booting on these machines for 4.10? :)

Jon.
Bjorn Helgaas Dec. 6, 2016, 8:18 p.m. UTC | #8
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:46:00PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 12/05/2016 04:21 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:33:46PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> 
> >>> Even without this patch, I don't think it's a show-stopper to have
> >>> Linux mistakenly thinking this region is routed to PCI, because the
> >>> driver does reserve it and the PCI core will never try to use it.
> >>
> >> Ok. So are you happy with pulling in Duc's v4 patch and retaining
> >> status quo on the bridge resources for 4.10?
> > 
> > Yes, I think it looks good.  I'll finish packaging things up and
> > repost the current series.
> 
> Ok, great. So you're still pretty confident we'll have "out of the box"
> booting on these machines for 4.10? :)

I just merged pci/ecam into my "next" branch, so as long as tomorrow's
linux-next boots out of the box, we should be set.  I made the following
changes compared to v11:

  - dropped the x86 change to use acpi_resource_consumer()
  - added parens around macro args used in arithmetic expressions
  - renamed "seg" to "node" in THUNDER_PEM_RES and THUNDER_PEM_QUIRK
  - incorporated (u64) cast and dropped "UL" postfix for THUNDER_PEM_QUIRK

Let me know if you see any issues.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jon Masters Dec. 6, 2016, 8:23 p.m. UTC | #9
On 12/06/2016 03:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:46:00PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On 12/05/2016 04:21 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:33:46PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>>
>>>>> Even without this patch, I don't think it's a show-stopper to have
>>>>> Linux mistakenly thinking this region is routed to PCI, because the
>>>>> driver does reserve it and the PCI core will never try to use it.
>>>>
>>>> Ok. So are you happy with pulling in Duc's v4 patch and retaining
>>>> status quo on the bridge resources for 4.10?
>>>
>>> Yes, I think it looks good.  I'll finish packaging things up and
>>> repost the current series.
>>
>> Ok, great. So you're still pretty confident we'll have "out of the box"
>> booting on these machines for 4.10? :)
> 
> I just merged pci/ecam into my "next" branch, so as long as tomorrow's
> linux-next boots out of the box, we should be set.  I made the following
> changes compared to v11:
> 
>   - dropped the x86 change to use acpi_resource_consumer()
>   - added parens around macro args used in arithmetic expressions
>   - renamed "seg" to "node" in THUNDER_PEM_RES and THUNDER_PEM_QUIRK
>   - incorporated (u64) cast and dropped "UL" postfix for THUNDER_PEM_QUIRK
> 
> Let me know if you see any issues.

Thanks - I'll test linux-next tomorrow.

Jon.
Jon Masters Dec. 13, 2016, 9:35 p.m. UTC | #10
On 12/06/2016 03:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> I just merged pci/ecam into my "next" branch, so as long as tomorrow's
> linux-next boots out of the box, we should be set.  I made the following
> changes compared to v11:
> 
>   - dropped the x86 change to use acpi_resource_consumer()
>   - added parens around macro args used in arithmetic expressions
>   - renamed "seg" to "node" in THUNDER_PEM_RES and THUNDER_PEM_QUIRK
>   - incorporated (u64) cast and dropped "UL" postfix for THUNDER_PEM_QUIRK
> 
> Let me know if you see any issues.

Just following up. Please find attached a boot log from an HPE ProLiant m400
Moonshot X-Gene based cartridge running next-20161213 with pci/ecam branch.

Here is the /proc/iomem output as well:

# cat /proc/iomem
10520000-10523fff : APMC0D18:00
  10520000-10523fff : APMC0D18:00
10524000-10527fff : APMC0D17:00
10540000-1054a0ff : APMC0D01:00
  10546000-10546fff : APMC0D50:00
  1054a000-1054a00f : APMC0D12:03
    1054a000-1054a00f : APMC0D12:02
      1054a000-1054a00f : APMC0D12:01
        1054a000-1054a00f : APMC0D12:00
17000000-17000fff : APMC0D01:00
17001000-17001fff : APMC0D01:00
  17001000-170013ff : APMC0D15:00
    17001000-170013ff : APMC0D15:00
1701c000-1701cfff : APMC0D14:00
1a800000-1a800fff : APMC0D0D:00
  1a800000-1a800fff : APMC0D0D:00
1c000200-1c0002ff : APMC0D06:00
1c021000-1c0210ff : APMC0D08:00
  1c021000-1c02101f : serial
1c024000-1c024fff : APMC0D07:00
1f230000-1f230fff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f230000-1f230fff : APMC0D0D:00
1f23d000-1f23dfff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f23d000-1f23dfff : APMC0D0D:00
1f23e000-1f23efff : APMC0D0D:00
  1f23e000-1f23efff : APMC0D0D:00
1f2a0000-1f31ffff : APMC0D06:00
1f500000-1f50ffff : PNP0A08:00
78800000-78800fff : APMC0D13:00
  78800000-78800fff : APMC0D12:03
    78800000-78800fff : APMC0D12:02
      78800000-78800fff : APMC0D12:01
        78800000-78800fff : APMC0D12:00
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D11:00
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D10:03
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D10:02
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D10:01
          78800000-78800fff : APMC0D10:00
79000000-798fffff : APMC0D0E:00
7c000000-7c1fffff : APMC0D12:00
7c200000-7c3fffff : APMC0D12:01
7c400000-7c5fffff : APMC0D12:02
7c600000-7c7fffff : APMC0D12:03
7e000000-7e000fff : APMC0D13:00
7e200000-7e200fff : APMC0D10:03
  7e200000-7e200fff : APMC0D10:02
    7e200000-7e200fff : APMC0D10:01
      7e200000-7e200fff : APMC0D10:00
7e600000-7e600fff : APMC0D11:00
7e700000-7e700fff : APMC0D10:03
  7e700000-7e700fff : APMC0D10:02
    7e700000-7e700fff : APMC0D10:01
      7e700000-7e700fff : APMC0D10:00
7e720000-7e720fff : APMC0D10:03
  7e720000-7e720fff : APMC0D10:02
    7e720000-7e720fff : APMC0D10:01
      7e720000-7e720fff : APMC0D10:00
7e800000-7e800fff : APMC0D10:00
7e840000-7e840fff : APMC0D10:01
7e880000-7e880fff : APMC0D10:02
7e8c0000-7e8c0fff : APMC0D10:03
7e930000-7e930fff : APMC0D13:00
4000000000-4001ffffff : System RAM
  4000080000-4000c9ffff : Kernel code
  4000e20000-400171ffff : Kernel data
40023a0000-4ff733ffff : System RAM
4ff7340000-4ff77cffff : reserved
4ff77d0000-4ff79cffff : System RAM
4ff79d0000-4ff7e7ffff : reserved
4ff7e80000-4ff7e8ffff : System RAM
4ff7e90000-4ff7efffff : reserved
4ff7f10000-4ff800ffff : reserved
4ff8010000-4fffffffff : System RAM
a020000000-a03fffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
  a020000000-a0201fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
    a020000000-a0200fffff : 0000:01:00.0
      a020000000-a0200fffff : mlx4_core
    a020100000-a0201fffff : 0000:01:00.0
a060000000-a07fffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
a0d0000000-a0dfffffff : PCI ECAM
a110000000-a14fffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
  a110000000-a121ffffff : PCI Bus 0000:01
    a110000000-a111ffffff : 0000:01:00.0
      a110000000-a111ffffff : mlx4_core
    a112000000-a121ffffff : 0000:01:00.0

Thanks again, Bjorn. Looking forward to seeing this upstream.

Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
index 8a177a1..a16fc8e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
@@ -114,6 +114,19 @@  int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
+{
+	struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
+	int status;
+
+	status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
+	resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
+		if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW))
+			resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
+	}
+	return status;
+}
+
 /*
  * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
  * mapping.
@@ -190,6 +203,7 @@  struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
 	}
 
 	root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info;
+	root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources;
 	root_ops->pci_ops = &ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops;
 	bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg);
 	if (!bus)