Message ID | 20161129160005.GE441@x4 |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 05:00:05PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > Building gcc with -fsanitize=undefined shows: > rtlanal.c:5210:38: runtime error: shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' > > This happens because if_then_else_cond() in combine.c calls > num_sign_bit_copies() in rtlanal.c with mode==BLKmode. > > 5205 bitwidth = GET_MODE_PRECISION (mode); > 5206 if (bitwidth > HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT) > 5207 return 1; > 5208 > 5209 nonzero = nonzero_bits (x, mode); > 5210 return nonzero & (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << (bitwidth - 1)) > 5211 ? 1 : bitwidth - floor_log2 (nonzero) - 1; > > This causes (bitwidth - 1) to wrap around. Could you also add a gcc_assert here? > PR rtl-optimization/78588 > * combine.c (if_then_else_cond): Also guard against BLKmode. Approved, please apply. Thanks, Segher
diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c index 22fb7a976538..a32a0ecc72fb 100644 --- a/gcc/combine.c +++ b/gcc/combine.c @@ -9176,7 +9176,7 @@ if_then_else_cond (rtx x, rtx *ptrue, rtx *pfalse) /* If X is known to be either 0 or -1, those are the true and false values when testing X. */ else if (x == constm1_rtx || x == const0_rtx - || (mode != VOIDmode + || (mode != VOIDmode && mode != BLKmode && num_sign_bit_copies (x, mode) == GET_MODE_PRECISION (mode))) { *ptrue = constm1_rtx, *pfalse = const0_rtx;