From patchwork Mon Nov  1 11:14:34 2010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 69757
Return-Path: 
 <gcc-patches-return-276946-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A290B70DA
	for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;
	Mon,  1 Nov 2010 22:14:43 +1100 (EST)
Received: (qmail 27999 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2010 11:14:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 27991 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2010 11:14:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL, BAYES_00,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com)
	(38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with
	ESMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:14:35 +0000
Received: (qmail 25523 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2010 11:14:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.106?) (jie@127.0.0.2) by
	mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 1 Nov 2010 11:14:34 -0000
Message-ID: <4CCEA11A.5010803@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:14:34 +0800
From: Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100918 Icedove/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [RFC] xfail libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/profile/mh.cc for uclibc
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:gcc-patches-unsubscribe-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

Hi,

uClibc does not provide __malloc_hook. So that test should be xfailed 
for uclibc.  Is it OK?


Regards,


	* testsuite/ext/profile/mh.cc: Add xfail for uclibc.

Index: testsuite/ext/profile/mh.cc
===================================================================
--- testsuite/ext/profile/mh.cc	(revision 166125)
+++ testsuite/ext/profile/mh.cc	(working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // { dg-options "-D_GLIBCXX_PROFILE" }
 // { dg-do compile { target *-*-linux* } }
+// { dg-xfail-if "" { uclibc } { "*" } { "" } }
 
 // -*- C++ -*-