diff mbox

[v14,12/22] vfio: Add notifier callback to parent's ops structure of mdev

Message ID 1479329194-10247-13-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Kirti Wankhede Nov. 16, 2016, 8:46 p.m. UTC
Add a notifier calback to parent's ops structure of mdev device so that per
device notifer for vfio module is registered through vfio_mdev module.

Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
Change-Id: Iafa6f1721aecdd6e50eb93b153b5621e6d29b637
---
 drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/mdev.h          |  9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Dong Jia Shi Nov. 17, 2016, 2:15 a.m. UTC | #1
* Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> [2016-11-17 02:16:24 +0530]:

Hi Kirti,

> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
[...]

> @@ -51,6 +78,11 @@ static void vfio_mdev_release(void *device_data)
>  	if (likely(parent->ops->release))
>  		parent->ops->release(mdev);
> 
> +	if (likely(parent->ops->notifier)) {
> +		if (vfio_unregister_notifier(&mdev->dev, &mdev->nb))
> +			pr_err("Failed to unregister notifier for mdev\n");
For the -ENOTTY case, we should not fail here either.

> +	}
> +
>  	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>  }
> 
[...]
Kirti Wankhede Nov. 17, 2016, 5:05 a.m. UTC | #2
On 11/17/2016 7:45 AM, Dong Jia Shi wrote:
> * Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> [2016-11-17 02:16:24 +0530]:
> 
> Hi Kirti,
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
> [...]
> 
>> @@ -51,6 +78,11 @@ static void vfio_mdev_release(void *device_data)
>>  	if (likely(parent->ops->release))
>>  		parent->ops->release(mdev);
>>
>> +	if (likely(parent->ops->notifier)) {
>> +		if (vfio_unregister_notifier(&mdev->dev, &mdev->nb))
>> +			pr_err("Failed to unregister notifier for mdev\n");
> For the -ENOTTY case, we should not fail here either.
> 

Removing the error print and ignoring return from this unregister call.
Updating this patch on this thread.

>> +	}
>> +
>>  	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>>  }
>>
> [...]
>
Jike Song Nov. 17, 2016, 12:35 p.m. UTC | #3
On 11/17/2016 04:46 AM, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> Add a notifier calback to parent's ops structure of mdev device so that per
> device notifer for vfio module is registered through vfio_mdev module.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
> Change-Id: Iafa6f1721aecdd6e50eb93b153b5621e6d29b637
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/mdev.h          |  9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
> index ffc36758cb84..2f8e06e5f95a 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,15 @@
>  #define DRIVER_AUTHOR   "NVIDIA Corporation"
>  #define DRIVER_DESC     "VFIO based driver for Mediated device"
>  
> +static int vfio_mdev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> +			      void *data)
> +{
> +	struct mdev_device *mdev = container_of(nb, struct mdev_device, nb);
> +	struct parent_device *parent = mdev->parent;
> +
> +	return parent->ops->notifier(mdev, action, data);
> +}
> +
>  static int vfio_mdev_open(void *device_data)
>  {
>  	struct mdev_device *mdev = device_data;
> @@ -36,9 +45,27 @@ static int vfio_mdev_open(void *device_data)
>  	if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	if (likely(parent->ops->notifier)) {
> +		mdev->nb.notifier_call = vfio_mdev_notifier;
> +		ret = vfio_register_notifier(&mdev->dev, &mdev->nb);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * This should not fail if backend iommu module doesn't support
> +		 * register_notifier.
> +		 */
> +		if (ret && (ret != -ENOTTY)) {
> +			pr_err("Failed to register notifier for mdev\n");
> +			module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = parent->ops->open(mdev);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
> +		if (likely(parent->ops->notifier))
> +			vfio_unregister_notifier(&mdev->dev, &mdev->nb);
>  		module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> +	}
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -51,6 +78,11 @@ static void vfio_mdev_release(void *device_data)
>  	if (likely(parent->ops->release))
>  		parent->ops->release(mdev);
>  
> +	if (likely(parent->ops->notifier)) {
> +		if (vfio_unregister_notifier(&mdev->dev, &mdev->nb))
> +			pr_err("Failed to unregister notifier for mdev\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/mdev.h b/include/linux/mdev.h
> index ec819e9a115a..94c43034c297 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mdev.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct mdev_device {
>  	struct kref		ref;
>  	struct list_head	next;
>  	struct kobject		*type_kobj;
> +	struct notifier_block	nb;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> @@ -85,6 +86,12 @@ struct mdev_device {
>   * @mmap:		mmap callback
>   *			@mdev: mediated device structure
>   *			@vma: vma structure
> + * @notifer:		Notifier callback, currently only for
> + *			VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DMA_UNMAP action notified duing
> + *			DMA_UNMAP call on mapped iova range.
> + *			@mdev: mediated device structure
> + *			@action: Action for which notifier is called
> + *			@data: Data associated with the notifier
>   * Parent device that support mediated device should be registered with mdev
>   * module with parent_ops structure.
>   **/
> @@ -106,6 +113,8 @@ struct parent_ops {
>  	ssize_t (*ioctl)(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
>  			 unsigned long arg);
>  	int	(*mmap)(struct mdev_device *mdev, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> +	int	(*notifier)(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned long action,
> +			    void *data);
>  };
>  
>  /* interface for exporting mdev supported type attributes */
>

Hi Alex, Kirti,

Since everyone agreed we should let the vendor driver call vfio_register_notifier
directly, can you drop this patch from merging? So that I don't need to send a
reverse patch.

Thanks :)

--
Thanks,
Jike
Alex Williamson Nov. 17, 2016, 3:27 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:35:38 +0800
Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com> wrote:

> On 11/17/2016 04:46 AM, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> > Add a notifier calback to parent's ops structure of mdev device so that per
> > device notifer for vfio module is registered through vfio_mdev module.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
> > Change-Id: Iafa6f1721aecdd6e50eb93b153b5621e6d29b637
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  include/linux/mdev.h          |  9 +++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> 
> Hi Alex, Kirti,
> 
> Since everyone agreed we should let the vendor driver call vfio_register_notifier
> directly, can you drop this patch from merging? So that I don't need to send a
> reverse patch.

This seems like a reasonable request to me, this patch drops cleanly
from the series.  Any objection Kirti?  It seems like it removes a
little bit of pre-release churn from the API.  Thanks,

Alex
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
index ffc36758cb84..2f8e06e5f95a 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
@@ -24,6 +24,15 @@ 
 #define DRIVER_AUTHOR   "NVIDIA Corporation"
 #define DRIVER_DESC     "VFIO based driver for Mediated device"
 
+static int vfio_mdev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+			      void *data)
+{
+	struct mdev_device *mdev = container_of(nb, struct mdev_device, nb);
+	struct parent_device *parent = mdev->parent;
+
+	return parent->ops->notifier(mdev, action, data);
+}
+
 static int vfio_mdev_open(void *device_data)
 {
 	struct mdev_device *mdev = device_data;
@@ -36,9 +45,27 @@  static int vfio_mdev_open(void *device_data)
 	if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	if (likely(parent->ops->notifier)) {
+		mdev->nb.notifier_call = vfio_mdev_notifier;
+		ret = vfio_register_notifier(&mdev->dev, &mdev->nb);
+
+		/*
+		 * This should not fail if backend iommu module doesn't support
+		 * register_notifier.
+		 */
+		if (ret && (ret != -ENOTTY)) {
+			pr_err("Failed to register notifier for mdev\n");
+			module_put(THIS_MODULE);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
 	ret = parent->ops->open(mdev);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
+		if (likely(parent->ops->notifier))
+			vfio_unregister_notifier(&mdev->dev, &mdev->nb);
 		module_put(THIS_MODULE);
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -51,6 +78,11 @@  static void vfio_mdev_release(void *device_data)
 	if (likely(parent->ops->release))
 		parent->ops->release(mdev);
 
+	if (likely(parent->ops->notifier)) {
+		if (vfio_unregister_notifier(&mdev->dev, &mdev->nb))
+			pr_err("Failed to unregister notifier for mdev\n");
+	}
+
 	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/mdev.h b/include/linux/mdev.h
index ec819e9a115a..94c43034c297 100644
--- a/include/linux/mdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/mdev.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@  struct mdev_device {
 	struct kref		ref;
 	struct list_head	next;
 	struct kobject		*type_kobj;
+	struct notifier_block	nb;
 };
 
 /**
@@ -85,6 +86,12 @@  struct mdev_device {
  * @mmap:		mmap callback
  *			@mdev: mediated device structure
  *			@vma: vma structure
+ * @notifer:		Notifier callback, currently only for
+ *			VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DMA_UNMAP action notified duing
+ *			DMA_UNMAP call on mapped iova range.
+ *			@mdev: mediated device structure
+ *			@action: Action for which notifier is called
+ *			@data: Data associated with the notifier
  * Parent device that support mediated device should be registered with mdev
  * module with parent_ops structure.
  **/
@@ -106,6 +113,8 @@  struct parent_ops {
 	ssize_t (*ioctl)(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
 			 unsigned long arg);
 	int	(*mmap)(struct mdev_device *mdev, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
+	int	(*notifier)(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned long action,
+			    void *data);
 };
 
 /* interface for exporting mdev supported type attributes */