diff mbox

[v8,10/16] drivers: iommu: arm-smmu-v3: split probe functions into DT/generic portions

Message ID 20161116152936.22955-11-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Lorenzo Pieralisi Nov. 16, 2016, 3:29 p.m. UTC
Current ARM SMMUv3 probe functions intermingle HW and DT probing in the
initialization functions to detect and programme the ARM SMMU v3 driver
features. In order to allow probing the ARM SMMUv3 with other firmwares
than DT, this patch splits the ARM SMMUv3 init functions into DT and HW
specific portions so that other FW interfaces (ie ACPI) can reuse the HW
probing functions and skip the DT portion accordingly.

This patch implements no functional change, only code reshuffling.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Comments

Will Deacon Nov. 18, 2016, 3:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:29:30PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Current ARM SMMUv3 probe functions intermingle HW and DT probing in the
> initialization functions to detect and programme the ARM SMMU v3 driver
> features. In order to allow probing the ARM SMMUv3 with other firmwares
> than DT, this patch splits the ARM SMMUv3 init functions into DT and HW
> specific portions so that other FW interfaces (ie ACPI) can reuse the HW
> probing functions and skip the DT portion accordingly.
> 
> This patch implements no functional change, only code reshuffling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index e6e1c87..ed563307 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2381,10 +2381,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, bool bypass)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  {
>  	u32 reg;
> -	bool coherent;
> +	bool coherent = smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY;
>  
>  	/* IDR0 */
>  	reg = readl_relaxed(smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_IDR0);
> @@ -2436,13 +2436,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HYP;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * The dma-coherent property is used in preference to the ID
> +	 * The coherency feature as set by FW is used in preference to the ID
>  	 * register, but warn on mismatch.
>  	 */
> -	coherent = of_dma_is_coherent(smmu->dev->of_node);
> -	if (coherent)
> -		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY;
> -
>  	if (!!(reg & IDR0_COHACC) != coherent)
>  		dev_warn(smmu->dev, "IDR0.COHACC overridden by dma-coherent property (%s)\n",
>  			 coherent ? "true" : "false");
> @@ -2563,21 +2559,37 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				    struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> +				    bool *bypass)
>  {
> -	int irq, ret;
> -	struct resource *res;
> -	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -	bool bypass = true;
>  	u32 cells;
>  
> +	*bypass = true;
> +
>  	if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "#iommu-cells", &cells))
>  		dev_err(dev, "missing #iommu-cells property\n");
>  	else if (cells != 1)
>  		dev_err(dev, "invalid #iommu-cells value (%d)\n", cells);
>  	else
> -		bypass = false;
> +		*bypass = false;
> +
> +	parse_driver_options(smmu);
> +
> +	if (of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node))
> +		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY;
> +
> +	return 0;

I know you're only moving code here, but the *bypass output parameter
now seems to be redundant with the unconditional return 0. Given that
we only set bypass to true if something went wrong, why don't we return
-ENODEV in those cases, kill the bypass parameter and rework the return
value check in the caller so that, rather than fail the probe, we pass
bypass=true to the reset function?

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index e6e1c87..ed563307 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2381,10 +2381,10 @@  static int arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, bool bypass)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
 	u32 reg;
-	bool coherent;
+	bool coherent = smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY;
 
 	/* IDR0 */
 	reg = readl_relaxed(smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_IDR0);
@@ -2436,13 +2436,9 @@  static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HYP;
 
 	/*
-	 * The dma-coherent property is used in preference to the ID
+	 * The coherency feature as set by FW is used in preference to the ID
 	 * register, but warn on mismatch.
 	 */
-	coherent = of_dma_is_coherent(smmu->dev->of_node);
-	if (coherent)
-		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY;
-
 	if (!!(reg & IDR0_COHACC) != coherent)
 		dev_warn(smmu->dev, "IDR0.COHACC overridden by dma-coherent property (%s)\n",
 			 coherent ? "true" : "false");
@@ -2563,21 +2559,37 @@  static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				    struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+				    bool *bypass)
 {
-	int irq, ret;
-	struct resource *res;
-	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	bool bypass = true;
 	u32 cells;
 
+	*bypass = true;
+
 	if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "#iommu-cells", &cells))
 		dev_err(dev, "missing #iommu-cells property\n");
 	else if (cells != 1)
 		dev_err(dev, "invalid #iommu-cells value (%d)\n", cells);
 	else
-		bypass = false;
+		*bypass = false;
+
+	parse_driver_options(smmu);
+
+	if (of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node))
+		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	int irq, ret;
+	struct resource *res;
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	bool bypass;
 
 	smmu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*smmu), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!smmu) {
@@ -2614,10 +2626,12 @@  static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (irq > 0)
 		smmu->gerr_irq = irq;
 
-	parse_driver_options(smmu);
+	ret = arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(pdev, smmu, &bypass);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	/* Probe the h/w */
-	ret = arm_smmu_device_probe(smmu);
+	ret = arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(smmu);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -2679,7 +2693,7 @@  static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver = {
 		.name		= "arm-smmu-v3",
 		.of_match_table	= of_match_ptr(arm_smmu_of_match),
 	},
-	.probe	= arm_smmu_device_dt_probe,
+	.probe	= arm_smmu_device_probe,
 	.remove	= arm_smmu_device_remove,
 };