diff mbox

[3/3] rtc: rtc-twl: use irq_of_parse_and_map helper

Message ID 1478945246-32056-4-git-send-email-Nicolae_Rosia@mentor.com
State Rejected
Headers show

Commit Message

Nicolae Rosia Nov. 12, 2016, 10:07 a.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Nicolae Rosia <Nicolae_Rosia@mentor.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/Kconfig   | 2 +-
 drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Sebastian Reichel Nov. 12, 2016, 11:20 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

> Signed-off-by: Nicolae Rosia <Nicolae_Rosia@mentor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/Kconfig   | 2 +-
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


This patch is missing long description. I would have patched it the
other way around. There is no reason to use irq_of_parse_and_map if
generic platform_get_irq can be used.

-- Sebastian
Nicolae Rosia Nov. 12, 2016, 11:37 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,


On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> wrote:
> This patch is missing long description. I would have patched it the
> other way around. There is no reason to use irq_of_parse_and_map if
> generic platform_get_irq can be used.
Since this patch series removes platform support and makes the driver DT only,
I thought it would be a good idea to make it explicit that it depends on OF_IRQ.

Regards,
Nicolae
Tony Lindgren Nov. 12, 2016, 5:58 p.m. UTC | #3
* Nicolae Rosia <nicolae.rosia.oss@gmail.com> [161112 03:37]:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> wrote:
> > This patch is missing long description. I would have patched it the
> > other way around. There is no reason to use irq_of_parse_and_map if
> > generic platform_get_irq can be used.
> Since this patch series removes platform support and makes the driver DT only,
> I thought it would be a good idea to make it explicit that it depends on OF_IRQ.

You can still use platform_get_irq(), eventually that will be just some
generic call. Don't we already have the "generic" names defined somewhere
in kernel?

Regards,

Tony
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
index 2189216..7ac7579 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@  config RTC_DRV_TWL92330
 config RTC_DRV_TWL4030
 	tristate "TI TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL6030/TPS659x0"
 	depends on TWL4030_CORE
-	depends on OF
+	depends on OF && OF_IRQ
 	help
 	  If you say yes here you get support for the RTC on the
 	  TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL6030 family chips, used mostly with OMAP3 platforms.
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
index 3d76322..7994baf 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
 
 #include <linux/i2c/twl.h>
 
@@ -494,7 +495,7 @@  static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct twl_rtc *twl_rtc;
 	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
-	int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	int irq;
 	u8 rd_reg;
 
 	if (!np) {
@@ -502,6 +503,7 @@  static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
 	if (irq <= 0)
 		return ret;