@@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ static int recv_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
chip->timeout_c,
&priv->read_queue, true) == 0) {
burstcnt = min_t(int, get_burstcount(chip), count - size);
+ if (burstcnt < 0) {
+ dev_err(&chip->dev,
+ "Unable to read burstcount in %s:%d (%s)\n",
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
+ return rc;
+ }
rc = tpm_tis_read_bytes(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality),
burstcnt, buf + size);
@@ -272,6 +278,13 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
while (count < len - 1) {
burstcnt = min_t(int, get_burstcount(chip), len - count - 1);
+ if (burstcnt < 0) {
+ dev_err(&chip->dev,
+ "Unable to read burstcount in %s:%d (%s)\n",
+ __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
+ rc = burstcnt;
+ goto out_err;
+ }
rc = tpm_tis_write_bytes(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality),
burstcnt, buf + count);
if (rc < 0)
If the TPM we're connecting to uses a static burst count, it will report a burst count of zero throughout the response read. However, get_burstcount assumes that a response of zero indicates that the TPM is not ready to receive more data. In this case, it returns a negative error code, which is passed on to tpm_tis_{write,read}_bytes as a u16, causing them to read/write far too many bytes. This patch checks for negative return codes and bails out from recv_data and tpm_tis_send_data. --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)