| Message ID | 20161030132511.GA23794@waldemar-brodkorb.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
Hello, On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:25:11 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Add requested bug report > > Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> > --- > package/binutils/Config.in.host | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/package/binutils/Config.in.host b/package/binutils/Config.in.host > index a7610b4..dce6996 100644 > --- a/package/binutils/Config.in.host > +++ b/package/binutils/Config.in.host > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ choice > config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_27_X > bool "binutils 2.27" > # supported but broken on Microblaze > + # see https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 > depends on !BR2_microblaze Your bug report is about binutils 2.27 generating broken binaries for microblaze/musl, but you disable binutils 2.27 completely for microblaze, and not just for musl. Why so? Thanks, Thomas
Hi Thomas, Thomas Petazzoni wrote, > Hello, > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:25:11 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > Add requested bug report > > > > Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> > > --- > > package/binutils/Config.in.host | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/package/binutils/Config.in.host b/package/binutils/Config.in.host > > index a7610b4..dce6996 100644 > > --- a/package/binutils/Config.in.host > > +++ b/package/binutils/Config.in.host > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ choice > > config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_27_X > > bool "binutils 2.27" > > # supported but broken on Microblaze > > + # see https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 > > depends on !BR2_microblaze > > Your bug report is about binutils 2.27 generating broken binaries for > microblaze/musl, but you disable binutils 2.27 completely for > microblaze, and not just for musl. Why so? Because the binutils bug affects musl/uClibc-ng and glibc. I just used musl to bisect and simplified the bug report. Furthermore I normally get very good support from the musl devs in case of toolchain issues. best regards Waldemar
Hello, On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 17:18:09 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > > config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_27_X > > > bool "binutils 2.27" > > > # supported but broken on Microblaze > > > + # see https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 > > > depends on !BR2_microblaze > > > > Your bug report is about binutils 2.27 generating broken binaries for > > microblaze/musl, but you disable binutils 2.27 completely for > > microblaze, and not just for musl. Why so? > > Because the binutils bug affects musl/uClibc-ng and glibc. > I just used musl to bisect and simplified the bug report. > Furthermore I normally get very good support from the musl devs > in case of toolchain issues. ACK, thanks for the explanation. But then perhaps your bug report should be made more accurate? As it is written, one might understand than it is a musl-specific problem. Knowing that uclibc-ng and glibc are also affected is quite important IMO. Thanks, Thomas
Hello, On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:25:11 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Add requested bug report > > Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> > --- > package/binutils/Config.in.host | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Applied to master, thanks. Thomas
diff --git a/package/binutils/Config.in.host b/package/binutils/Config.in.host index a7610b4..dce6996 100644 --- a/package/binutils/Config.in.host +++ b/package/binutils/Config.in.host @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ choice config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_27_X bool "binutils 2.27" # supported but broken on Microblaze + # see https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20748 depends on !BR2_microblaze endchoice
Add requested bug report Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org> --- package/binutils/Config.in.host | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)