[net-next] sctp: remove the old ttl expires policy

The prsctp polices include ttl expires policy already, we should remove
the old ttl expires codes, and just adjust the new polices' codes to be
compatible with the old one for users.

This patch is to remove all the old expires codes, and if prsctp polices
are not set, it will still set msg's expires_at and check the expires in
sctp_check_abandoned.

Note that asoc->prsctp_enable is set by default, so users can't feel any
difference even if they use the old expires api in userspace.

Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
---
 include/net/sctp/structs.h |  1 -
 net/sctp/chunk.c           | 32 ++++++++------------------------
 net/sctp/output.c          |  3 ---
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> The prsctp polices include ttl expires policy already, we should remove
> the old ttl expires codes, and just adjust the new polices' codes to be
> compatible with the old one for users.
> 
> This patch is to remove all the old expires codes, and if prsctp polices
> are not set, it will still set msg's expires_at and check the expires in
> sctp_check_abandoned.
> 
> Note that asoc->prsctp_enable is set by default, so users can't feel any
> difference even if they use the old expires api in userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>

> ---
>  include/net/sctp/structs.h |  1 -
>  net/sctp/chunk.c           | 32 ++++++++------------------------
>  net/sctp/output.c          |  3 ---
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> index 11c3bf2..61732e9 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> @@ -530,7 +530,6 @@ struct sctp_datamsg {
>  	/* Did the messenge fail to send? */
>  	int send_error;
>  	u8 send_failed:1,
> -	   can_abandon:1,   /* can chunks from this message can be abandoned. */
>  	   can_delay;	    /* should this message be Nagle delayed */
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/net/sctp/chunk.c b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> index 7a1cdf4..615f0dd 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ static void sctp_datamsg_init(struct sctp_datamsg *msg)
>  	atomic_set(&msg->refcnt, 1);
>  	msg->send_failed = 0;
>  	msg->send_error = 0;
> -	msg->can_abandon = 0;
>  	msg->can_delay = 1;
>  	msg->expires_at = 0;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->chunks);
> @@ -182,20 +181,11 @@ struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *asoc,
>  	/* Note: Calculate this outside of the loop, so that all fragments
>  	 * have the same expiration.
>  	 */
> -	if (sinfo->sinfo_timetolive) {
> -		/* sinfo_timetolive is in milliseconds */
> +	if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable && sinfo->sinfo_timetolive &&
> +	    (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(sinfo->sinfo_flags) ||
> +	     !SCTP_PR_POLICY(sinfo->sinfo_flags)))
>  		msg->expires_at = jiffies +
>  				    msecs_to_jiffies(sinfo->sinfo_timetolive);
> -		msg->can_abandon = 1;
> -
> -		pr_debug("%s: msg:%p expires_at:%ld jiffies:%ld\n", __func__,
> -			 msg, msg->expires_at, jiffies);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable &&
> -	    SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(sinfo->sinfo_flags))
> -		msg->expires_at =
> -			jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sinfo->sinfo_timetolive);
>  
>  	/* This is the biggest possible DATA chunk that can fit into
>  	 * the packet
> @@ -354,18 +344,8 @@ errout:
>  /* Check whether this message has expired. */
>  int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
>  {
> -	if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable ||
> -	    !SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags)) {
> -		struct sctp_datamsg *msg = chunk->msg;
> -
> -		if (!msg->can_abandon)
> -			return 0;
> -
> -		if (time_after(jiffies, msg->expires_at))
> -			return 1;
> -
> +	if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
>  		return 0;
> -	}
>  
>  	if (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
>  	    time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> @@ -378,6 +358,10 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
>  		   chunk->sent_count > chunk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive) {
>  		chunk->asoc->abandoned_sent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(RTX)]++;
>  		return 1;
> +	} else if (!SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> +		   chunk->msg->expires_at &&
> +		   time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> +		return 1;
>  	}
>  	/* PRIO policy is processed by sendmsg, not here */
>  
> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
> index 2a5c189..f0af831 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
> @@ -865,9 +865,6 @@ static void sctp_packet_append_data(struct sctp_packet *packet,
>  		rwnd = 0;
>  
>  	asoc->peer.rwnd = rwnd;
> -	/* Has been accepted for transmission. */
> -	if (!asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
> -		chunk->msg->can_abandon = 0;
>  	sctp_chunk_assign_tsn(chunk);
>  	sctp_chunk_assign_ssn(chunk);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Sat,  8 Oct 2016 11:40:16 +0800

> The prsctp polices include ttl expires policy already, we should remove
> the old ttl expires codes, and just adjust the new polices' codes to be
> compatible with the old one for users.
> 
> This patch is to remove all the old expires codes, and if prsctp polices
> are not set, it will still set msg's expires_at and check the expires in
> sctp_check_abandoned.
> 
> Note that asoc->prsctp_enable is set by default, so users can't feel any
> difference even if they use the old expires api in userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>

Applied.