@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct neighbour {
struct neighbour __rcu *next;
struct neigh_table *tbl;
struct neigh_parms *parms;
- struct net_device *dev;
unsigned long used;
unsigned long confirmed;
unsigned long updated;
@@ -103,16 +102,17 @@ struct neighbour {
__u8 type;
__u8 dead;
atomic_t refcnt;
+ struct sk_buff_head arp_queue;
+ struct timer_list timer;
atomic_t probes;
rwlock_t lock;
seqlock_t ha_lock;
unsigned char ha[ALIGN(MAX_ADDR_LEN, sizeof(unsigned long))];
struct hh_cache *hh;
int (*output)(struct sk_buff *skb);
- struct sk_buff_head arp_queue;
- struct timer_list timer;
const struct neigh_ops *ops;
struct rcu_head rcu;
+ struct net_device *dev;
u8 primary_key[0];
};
Here is the followup patch. Thanks ! [PATCH net-next] neigh: reorder struct neighbour fields (refcnt) and (ha_lock, ha, dev, output, ops, primary_key) should be placed on a separate cache lines. refcnt can be often written, while other fields are mostly read. This gave me good result on stress test : before: real 0m45.570s user 0m15.525s sys 9m56.669s After: real 0m41.841s user 0m15.261s sys 8m45.949s Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> --- include/net/neighbour.h | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html