diff mbox

[v2] i2c / ACPI: Do not touch an I2C device if it belongs to another adapter

Message ID 20160920135925.45450-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Mika Westerberg Sept. 20, 2016, 1:59 p.m. UTC
When enumerating I2C devices connected to an I2C adapter we scan the whole
namespace (as it is possible to have devices anywhere in that namespace,
not just below the I2C adapter device) and add each found device to the I2C
bus in question.

Now after commit 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI
reconfigure notifications") checking of the adapter handle to the one found
in the I2cSerialBus() resource was moved to happen after resources of the
I2C device has been parsed. This means that if the I2cSerialBus() resource
points to an adapter that does not exists in the system we still parse
those resources. This is problematic in particular because
acpi_dev_resource_interrupt() tries to configure GSI if the device also has
an Interrupt() resource. Failing to do that results errrors like this to be
printed on the console:

  [   10.409490] ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37

To fix this we pass the I2C adapter to i2c_acpi_get_info() and make sure
the handle matches the one in the I2cSerialBus() resource before doing
anything else to the device.

Reported-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes from v1:
  * Require that ACPI adapter device is present if !adapter
  * Fill in adapter_handle only if not NULL
  * Remove passing of adapter_handle in i2c_acpi_add_device()

 drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Nicolai Stange Sept. 20, 2016, 6:49 p.m. UTC | #1
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> writes:

> When enumerating I2C devices connected to an I2C adapter we scan the whole
> namespace (as it is possible to have devices anywhere in that namespace,
> not just below the I2C adapter device) and add each found device to the I2C
> bus in question.
>
> Now after commit 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI
> reconfigure notifications") checking of the adapter handle to the one found
> in the I2cSerialBus() resource was moved to happen after resources of the
> I2C device has been parsed. This means that if the I2cSerialBus() resource
> points to an adapter that does not exists in the system we still parse
> those resources. This is problematic in particular because
> acpi_dev_resource_interrupt() tries to configure GSI if the device also has
> an Interrupt() resource. Failing to do that results errrors like this to be
> printed on the console:
>
>   [   10.409490] ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37
>
> To fix this we pass the I2C adapter to i2c_acpi_get_info() and make sure
> the handle matches the one in the I2cSerialBus() resource before doing
> anything else to the device.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>

I've just retested this v2 explicitly and it works like a charm.

Also,

  Reviewed-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>

if you want.


Thanks,

Nicolai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wolfram Sang Sept. 21, 2016, 5:48 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:59:25PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> When enumerating I2C devices connected to an I2C adapter we scan the whole
> namespace (as it is possible to have devices anywhere in that namespace,
> not just below the I2C adapter device) and add each found device to the I2C
> bus in question.
> 
> Now after commit 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI
> reconfigure notifications") checking of the adapter handle to the one found
> in the I2cSerialBus() resource was moved to happen after resources of the
> I2C device has been parsed. This means that if the I2cSerialBus() resource
> points to an adapter that does not exists in the system we still parse
> those resources. This is problematic in particular because
> acpi_dev_resource_interrupt() tries to configure GSI if the device also has
> an Interrupt() resource. Failing to do that results errrors like this to be
> printed on the console:
> 
>   [   10.409490] ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37
> 
> To fix this we pass the I2C adapter to i2c_acpi_get_info() and make sure
> the handle matches the one in the I2cSerialBus() resource before doing
> anything else to the device.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Considering this for for-current. So shall we add:

Fixes: 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfigure notifications")

?
Mika Westerberg Sept. 21, 2016, 8:45 a.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:48:35AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:59:25PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > When enumerating I2C devices connected to an I2C adapter we scan the whole
> > namespace (as it is possible to have devices anywhere in that namespace,
> > not just below the I2C adapter device) and add each found device to the I2C
> > bus in question.
> > 
> > Now after commit 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI
> > reconfigure notifications") checking of the adapter handle to the one found
> > in the I2cSerialBus() resource was moved to happen after resources of the
> > I2C device has been parsed. This means that if the I2cSerialBus() resource
> > points to an adapter that does not exists in the system we still parse
> > those resources. This is problematic in particular because
> > acpi_dev_resource_interrupt() tries to configure GSI if the device also has
> > an Interrupt() resource. Failing to do that results errrors like this to be
> > printed on the console:
> > 
> >   [   10.409490] ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37
> > 
> > To fix this we pass the I2C adapter to i2c_acpi_get_info() and make sure
> > the handle matches the one in the I2cSerialBus() resource before doing
> > anything else to the device.
> > 
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Considering this for for-current. So shall we add:
> 
> Fixes: 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfigure notifications")
> 
> ?

Yes please :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wolfram Sang Sept. 21, 2016, 4:14 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:45:02AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:48:35AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:59:25PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > When enumerating I2C devices connected to an I2C adapter we scan the whole
> > > namespace (as it is possible to have devices anywhere in that namespace,
> > > not just below the I2C adapter device) and add each found device to the I2C
> > > bus in question.
> > > 
> > > Now after commit 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI
> > > reconfigure notifications") checking of the adapter handle to the one found
> > > in the I2cSerialBus() resource was moved to happen after resources of the
> > > I2C device has been parsed. This means that if the I2cSerialBus() resource
> > > points to an adapter that does not exists in the system we still parse
> > > those resources. This is problematic in particular because
> > > acpi_dev_resource_interrupt() tries to configure GSI if the device also has
> > > an Interrupt() resource. Failing to do that results errrors like this to be
> > > printed on the console:
> > > 
> > >   [   10.409490] ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37
> > > 
> > > To fix this we pass the I2C adapter to i2c_acpi_get_info() and make sure
> > > the handle matches the one in the I2cSerialBus() resource before doing
> > > anything else to the device.
> > > 
> > > Reported-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Considering this for for-current. So shall we add:
> > 
> > Fixes: 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfigure notifications")
> > 
> > ?
> 
> Yes please :)

Huh? It doesn't apply on top of rc7 here? What did you base it on?
Mika Westerberg Sept. 22, 2016, 8:49 a.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:45:02AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:48:35AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:59:25PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > When enumerating I2C devices connected to an I2C adapter we scan the whole
> > > > namespace (as it is possible to have devices anywhere in that namespace,
> > > > not just below the I2C adapter device) and add each found device to the I2C
> > > > bus in question.
> > > > 
> > > > Now after commit 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI
> > > > reconfigure notifications") checking of the adapter handle to the one found
> > > > in the I2cSerialBus() resource was moved to happen after resources of the
> > > > I2C device has been parsed. This means that if the I2cSerialBus() resource
> > > > points to an adapter that does not exists in the system we still parse
> > > > those resources. This is problematic in particular because
> > > > acpi_dev_resource_interrupt() tries to configure GSI if the device also has
> > > > an Interrupt() resource. Failing to do that results errrors like this to be
> > > > printed on the console:
> > > > 
> > > >   [   10.409490] ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37
> > > > 
> > > > To fix this we pass the I2C adapter to i2c_acpi_get_info() and make sure
> > > > the handle matches the one in the I2cSerialBus() resource before doing
> > > > anything else to the device.
> > > > 
> > > > Reported-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Considering this for for-current. So shall we add:
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfigure notifications")
> > > 
> > > ?
> > 
> > Yes please :)
> 
> Huh? It doesn't apply on top of rc7 here? What did you base it on?

It is based on linux-next as it is on top of Jarkko's I2C ACPI namespace
cleanup patches. I'm wondering if I make an updated patch on top of
v4.8-rc7 does it conflict with the I2C stuff in linux-next? What's your
preference?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wolfram Sang Sept. 22, 2016, 8:59 a.m. UTC | #6
> > Huh? It doesn't apply on top of rc7 here? What did you base it on?
> 
> It is based on linux-next as it is on top of Jarkko's I2C ACPI namespace
> cleanup patches. I'm wondering if I make an updated patch on top of
> v4.8-rc7 does it conflict with the I2C stuff in linux-next? What's your
> preference?

I see. I'll add it to for-next, then. If someone wants it backported, it
needs to be rewritten and re-tested.
Mika Westerberg Sept. 22, 2016, 9:25 a.m. UTC | #7
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:59:24AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > > Huh? It doesn't apply on top of rc7 here? What did you base it on?
> > 
> > It is based on linux-next as it is on top of Jarkko's I2C ACPI namespace
> > cleanup patches. I'm wondering if I make an updated patch on top of
> > v4.8-rc7 does it conflict with the I2C stuff in linux-next? What's your
> > preference?
> 
> I see. I'll add it to for-next, then. If someone wants it backported, it
> needs to be rewritten and re-tested.

OK, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wolfram Sang Sept. 22, 2016, 5:46 p.m. UTC | #8
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:59:25PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> When enumerating I2C devices connected to an I2C adapter we scan the whole
> namespace (as it is possible to have devices anywhere in that namespace,
> not just below the I2C adapter device) and add each found device to the I2C
> bus in question.
> 
> Now after commit 525e6fabeae2 ("i2c / ACPI: add support for ACPI
> reconfigure notifications") checking of the adapter handle to the one found
> in the I2cSerialBus() resource was moved to happen after resources of the
> I2C device has been parsed. This means that if the I2cSerialBus() resource
> points to an adapter that does not exists in the system we still parse
> those resources. This is problematic in particular because
> acpi_dev_resource_interrupt() tries to configure GSI if the device also has
> an Interrupt() resource. Failing to do that results errrors like this to be
> printed on the console:
> 
>   [   10.409490] ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37
> 
> To fix this we pass the I2C adapter to i2c_acpi_get_info() and make sure
> the handle matches the one in the I2cSerialBus() resource before doing
> anything else to the device.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Applied to for-next, thanks!
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index c61c961cf8f9..5476f906b9e0 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@  static int i2c_acpi_do_lookup(struct acpi_device *adev,
 
 static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
 			     struct i2c_board_info *info,
+			     struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
 			     acpi_handle *adapter_handle)
 {
 	struct list_head resource_list;
@@ -182,8 +183,24 @@  static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (adapter) {
+		/* The adapter must match the one in I2cSerialBus() connector */
+		if (ACPI_HANDLE(&adapter->dev) != lookup.adapter_handle)
+			return -ENODEV;
+	} else {
+		struct acpi_device *adapter_adev;
+
+		/* The adapter must be present */
+		if (acpi_bus_get_device(lookup.adapter_handle, &adapter_adev))
+			return -ENODEV;
+		if (acpi_bus_get_status(adapter_adev) ||
+		    !adapter_adev->status.present)
+			return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
 	info->fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);
-	*adapter_handle = lookup.adapter_handle;
+	if (adapter_handle)
+		*adapter_handle = lookup.adapter_handle;
 
 	/* Then fill IRQ number if any */
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
@@ -225,16 +242,12 @@  static acpi_status i2c_acpi_add_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 level,
 {
 	struct i2c_adapter *adapter = data;
 	struct acpi_device *adev;
-	acpi_handle adapter_handle;
 	struct i2c_board_info info;
 
 	if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
 		return AE_OK;
 
-	if (i2c_acpi_get_info(adev, &info, &adapter_handle))
-		return AE_OK;
-
-	if (adapter_handle != ACPI_HANDLE(&adapter->dev))
+	if (i2c_acpi_get_info(adev, &info, adapter, NULL))
 		return AE_OK;
 
 	i2c_acpi_register_device(adapter, adev, &info);
@@ -368,7 +381,7 @@  static int i2c_acpi_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long value,
 
 	switch (value) {
 	case ACPI_RECONFIG_DEVICE_ADD:
-		if (i2c_acpi_get_info(adev, &info, &adapter_handle))
+		if (i2c_acpi_get_info(adev, &info, NULL, &adapter_handle))
 			break;
 
 		adapter = i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle(adapter_handle);