| Message ID | 20160918012014.GA11017@nyan |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Hi, On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 09:20:14PM -0400, Felix Janda wrote: > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de> Have you run the mremap tests of ltp with this on your host/guest combo? > --- > linux-user/mmap.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/linux-user/mmap.c b/linux-user/mmap.c > index c4371d9..4882816 100644 > --- a/linux-user/mmap.c > +++ b/linux-user/mmap.c > @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, > > if (flags & MREMAP_FIXED) { > host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), > - old_size, new_size, > + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, > flags, > g2h(new_addr)); > > @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, > host_addr = MAP_FAILED; > } else { > host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), > - old_size, new_size, > + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, > flags | MREMAP_FIXED, > g2h(mmap_start)); > if (reserved_va) { > -- > 2.7.3 >
Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 09:20:14PM -0400, Felix Janda wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de> > > Have you run the mremap tests of ltp with this on your host/guest > combo? I have just run the tests. My host is arm and my guest is aarch64. Without the patch all but mremap02 fail. With the patch all but mremap04 pass. The mremap04 test indicates that shmat is broken. > > --- > > linux-user/mmap.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/linux-user/mmap.c b/linux-user/mmap.c > > index c4371d9..4882816 100644 > > --- a/linux-user/mmap.c > > +++ b/linux-user/mmap.c > > @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, > > > > if (flags & MREMAP_FIXED) { > > host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), > > - old_size, new_size, > > + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, > > flags, > > g2h(new_addr)); > > > > @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, > > host_addr = MAP_FAILED; > > } else { > > host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), > > - old_size, new_size, > > + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, > > flags | MREMAP_FIXED, > > g2h(mmap_start)); > > if (reserved_va) { > > -- > > 2.7.3 > >
On 17 September 2016 at 18:20, Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de> > --- > linux-user/mmap.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/linux-user/mmap.c b/linux-user/mmap.c > index c4371d9..4882816 100644 > --- a/linux-user/mmap.c > +++ b/linux-user/mmap.c > @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, > > if (flags & MREMAP_FIXED) { > host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), > - old_size, new_size, > + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, > flags, > g2h(new_addr)); > > @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, > host_addr = MAP_FAILED; > } else { > host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), > - old_size, new_size, > + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, > flags | MREMAP_FIXED, > g2h(mmap_start)); > if (reserved_va) { > -- > 2.7.3 Rather than this, I think it would be better to switch to using the mremap() library call rather than direct syscall here, which then matches the other mremap()s later in the function. (That will work right because mremap()'s prototype says it takes size_t arguments, whereas syscall() is a generic thing which doesn't, and so the C default promotions do the wrong thing with the abi_ulongs.) The use of syscall(__NR_mremap, ...) originally dates back to 2008: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-12/msg01087.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-12/msg00480.html and was to permit compilation with glibc 2.4 which didn't support the 5-argument mremap() or define MREMAP_FIXED. Since glibc 2.4 dates back to a decade ago now, we no longer need to carry this ugly (and buggy) workaround for it. thanks -- PMM
Peter Maydell wrote: > On 17 September 2016 at 18:20, Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de> > > --- > > linux-user/mmap.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/linux-user/mmap.c b/linux-user/mmap.c > > index c4371d9..4882816 100644 > > --- a/linux-user/mmap.c > > +++ b/linux-user/mmap.c > > @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, > > > > if (flags & MREMAP_FIXED) { > > host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), > > - old_size, new_size, > > + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, > > flags, > > g2h(new_addr)); > > > > @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, > > host_addr = MAP_FAILED; > > } else { > > host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), > > - old_size, new_size, > > + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, > > flags | MREMAP_FIXED, > > g2h(mmap_start)); > > if (reserved_va) { > > -- > > 2.7.3 > > Rather than this, I think it would be better to switch to > using the mremap() library call rather than direct syscall > here, which then matches the other mremap()s later in the > function. (That will work right because mremap()'s prototype > says it takes size_t arguments, whereas syscall() is a > generic thing which doesn't, and so the C default promotions > do the wrong thing with the abi_ulongs.) > > The use of syscall(__NR_mremap, ...) originally dates back to 2008: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-12/msg01087.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-12/msg00480.html > > and was to permit compilation with glibc 2.4 which didn't > support the 5-argument mremap() or define MREMAP_FIXED. > > Since glibc 2.4 dates back to a decade ago now, we no longer > need to carry this ugly (and buggy) workaround for it. This sounds like a good idea. Thanks also for digging up the history. I will prepare a new patch. Thanks, Felix
diff --git a/linux-user/mmap.c b/linux-user/mmap.c index c4371d9..4882816 100644 --- a/linux-user/mmap.c +++ b/linux-user/mmap.c @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, if (flags & MREMAP_FIXED) { host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), - old_size, new_size, + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, flags, g2h(new_addr)); @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ abi_long target_mremap(abi_ulong old_addr, abi_ulong old_size, host_addr = MAP_FAILED; } else { host_addr = (void *) syscall(__NR_mremap, g2h(old_addr), - old_size, new_size, + (size_t) old_size, (size_t) new_size, flags | MREMAP_FIXED, g2h(mmap_start)); if (reserved_va) {
Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de> --- linux-user/mmap.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)