From patchwork Mon Oct  4 04:38:56 2010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [doc] clean up "Tree level if-conversion for vectorizer"
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 18:38:56 -0000
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 66615
Message-Id: <4CA95A60.5010809@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

This patch is to remove this sentence "This patch re-introduces
COND_EXPR at GIMPLE level.", because it is not that necessary to mention
that, and "this patch" is a little confusing here, at least to me.

"This patch" is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00122.html

OK to apply?


2010-10-04  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>

	* doc/passes.texi: Clean up.

Index: doc/passes.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/passes.texi	(revision 164741)
+++ doc/passes.texi	(working copy)
@@ -472,9 +472,8 @@
 We identify if convertible loops, if-convert statements and merge
 basic blocks in one big block.  The idea is to present loop in such
 form so that vectorizer can have one to one mapping between statements
-and available vector operations.  This patch re-introduces COND_EXPR
-at GIMPLE level.  This pass is located in @file{tree-if-conv.c} and is
-described by @code{pass_if_conversion}.
+and available vector operations.  This pass is located in 
+@file{tree-if-conv.c} and is described by @code{pass_if_conversion}.
 
 @item Conditional constant propagation