| Submitter | Yao Qi |
|---|---|
| Date | Oct. 4, 2010, 4:38 a.m. |
| Message ID | <4CA95A60.5010809@codesourcery.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/66615/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Comments
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote: > This patch is to remove this sentence "This patch re-introduces > COND_EXPR at GIMPLE level.", because it is not that necessary to mention > that, and "this patch" is a little confusing here, at least to me. > > "This patch" is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00122.html > > OK to apply? Ok. Thanks, Richard. > -- > Yao Qi > CodeSourcery > yao@codesourcery.com > (650) 331-3385 x739 >
Patch
2010-10-04 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> * doc/passes.texi: Clean up. Index: doc/passes.texi =================================================================== --- doc/passes.texi (revision 164741) +++ doc/passes.texi (working copy) @@ -472,9 +472,8 @@ We identify if convertible loops, if-convert statements and merge basic blocks in one big block. The idea is to present loop in such form so that vectorizer can have one to one mapping between statements -and available vector operations. This patch re-introduces COND_EXPR -at GIMPLE level. This pass is located in @file{tree-if-conv.c} and is -described by @code{pass_if_conversion}. +and available vector operations. This pass is located in +@file{tree-if-conv.c} and is described by @code{pass_if_conversion}. @item Conditional constant propagation