diff mbox

[doc] clean up "Tree level if-conversion for vectorizer"

Message ID 4CA95A60.5010809@codesourcery.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Yao Qi Oct. 4, 2010, 4:38 a.m. UTC 
This patch is to remove this sentence "This patch re-introduces
COND_EXPR at GIMPLE level.", because it is not that necessary to mention
that, and "this patch" is a little confusing here, at least to me.

"This patch" is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00122.html

OK to apply?

Comments

Richard Biener Oct. 4, 2010, 9:19 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> This patch is to remove this sentence "This patch re-introduces
> COND_EXPR at GIMPLE level.", because it is not that necessary to mention
> that, and "this patch" is a little confusing here, at least to me.
>
> "This patch" is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00122.html
>
> OK to apply?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> --
> Yao Qi
> CodeSourcery
> yao@codesourcery.com
> (650) 331-3385 x739
>
diff mbox

Patch

2010-10-04  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>

	* doc/passes.texi: Clean up.

Index: doc/passes.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/passes.texi	(revision 164741)
+++ doc/passes.texi	(working copy)
@@ -472,9 +472,8 @@ 
 We identify if convertible loops, if-convert statements and merge
 basic blocks in one big block.  The idea is to present loop in such
 form so that vectorizer can have one to one mapping between statements
-and available vector operations.  This patch re-introduces COND_EXPR
-at GIMPLE level.  This pass is located in @file{tree-if-conv.c} and is
-described by @code{pass_if_conversion}.
+and available vector operations.  This pass is located in 
+@file{tree-if-conv.c} and is described by @code{pass_if_conversion}.
 
 @item Conditional constant propagation