| Message ID | 57C57975.7040306@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
> Hi Bharat, > > @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct nwl_pcie > *pcie) > > } > > > > pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, > > - INTX_NUM, > > + INTX_NUM + 1, > > &legacy_domain_ops, > > pcie); > > This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so the domain > allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the way the driver currently > deals with mappings is quite broken (consistently adding 1 to the HW interrupt). > Hi Marc, Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: [ 2.441706] [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: ffffffc071888000 [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain->name)) return -EINVAL; Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above condition (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). And I'm consistently adding 1 to the HW interrupt as in nwl_pcie_leg_handler I get 0th bit set from MSGF_LEG_STATUS if INTA interrupt is raised but my hwirq number being mapped for INTA is 0x1 so that's I'm adding 1 to obtain correct virtual irq. Same case in nwl_pcie_free_irq_domain since hwirq starts from one I'm adding 1 to obtain virtual irq and free it. Thanks & Regards, Bharat This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 30/08/16 15:13, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: >> Hi Bharat, >>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct nwl_pcie >> *pcie) >>> } >>> >>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, >>> - INTX_NUM, >>> + INTX_NUM + 1, >>> &legacy_domain_ops, >>> pcie); >> >> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so the domain >> allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the way the driver currently >> deals with mappings is quite broken (consistently adding 1 to the HW interrupt). >> > Hi Marc, > > Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. > > [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 > > [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: > > [ 2.441706] > > [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 > > [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) > > [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: ffffffc071888000 > > [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate > > if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, > "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain->name)) > return -EINVAL; > > Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above condition (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. > This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have interrupt sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n-1). > And I'm consistently adding 1 to the HW interrupt as in > nwl_pcie_leg_handler I get 0th bit set from MSGF_LEG_STATUS if INTA > interrupt is raised but my hwirq number being mapped for INTA is 0x1 > so that's I'm adding 1 to obtain correct virtual irq. Same case in > nwl_pcie_free_irq_domain since hwirq starts from one I'm adding 1 to > obtain virtual irq and free it. I can see that. Nonetheless, this is wrong. Can you please test the patch I provided in my reply and report what happens? Thanks, M.
> On 30/08/16 15:13, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > >> Hi Bharat, > >>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > >>> nwl_pcie > >> *pcie) > >>> } > >>> > >>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, > >>> - INTX_NUM, > >>> + INTX_NUM + 1, > >>> &legacy_domain_ops, > >>> pcie); > >> > >> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so the > >> domain allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the way the > >> driver currently deals with mappings is quite broken (consistently adding 1 to > the HW interrupt). > >> > > Hi Marc, > > > > Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. > > > > [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > > [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > > [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 > > > > [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: > > > > [ 2.441706] > > > > [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 > > > > [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) > > > > [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: > ffffffc071888000 > > > > [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > > > [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > > > In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate > > > > if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, > > "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain->name)) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above condition > (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. > > This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). > > I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. > > Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have interrupt > sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n-1). Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a multi-function device comes the crash occurs. > > > And I'm consistently adding 1 to the HW interrupt as in > > nwl_pcie_leg_handler I get 0th bit set from MSGF_LEG_STATUS if INTA > > interrupt is raised but my hwirq number being mapped for INTA is 0x1 > > so that's I'm adding 1 to obtain correct virtual irq. Same case in > > nwl_pcie_free_irq_domain since hwirq starts from one I'm adding 1 to > > obtain virtual irq and free it. > > I can see that. Nonetheless, this is wrong. Can you please test the patch I > provided in my reply and report what happens? Can you be more specific on what is the wrong, I'm adding one since the hwirq starts from 0x1 as mentioned above. I did try your suggestion with Ethernet card, but kernel hangs (it does not show any crash also, just hangs) when I do interface up (without bit + 1, using only bit position in handler). This is not working because in the legacy domain virq mapping starts with hwirq 0x1, there is no mapping for 0x0 in the domain, so EP interrupt is not serviced since virq being returned is zero. Thanks & Regards, Bharat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 31/08/16 10:56, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > > On 30/08/16 15:13, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: >>>> Hi Bharat, >>>>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct >>>>> nwl_pcie >>>> *pcie) >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, >>>>> - INTX_NUM, >>>>> + INTX_NUM + 1, >>>>> &legacy_domain_ops, >>>>> pcie); >>>> >>>> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so the >>>> domain allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the way the >>>> driver currently deals with mappings is quite broken (consistently adding 1 to >> the HW interrupt). >>>> >>> Hi Marc, >>> >>> Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. >>> >>> [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy >>> >>> [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> >>> [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 >>> >>> [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: >>> >>> [ 2.441706] >>> >>> [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 >>> >>> [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) >>> >>> [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: >> ffffffc071888000 >>> >>> [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 >>> >>> [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 >>> >>> In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate >>> >>> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, >>> "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain->name)) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above condition >> (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. >>> This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). >> >> I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. >> >> Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have interrupt >> sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n-1). > > Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy interrupts > will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per > PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered > from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a multi-function device comes the > crash occurs. So who provides this hwirq? Who calls irq_domain_associate() with hwirq set to 4? >> >>> And I'm consistently adding 1 to the HW interrupt as in >>> nwl_pcie_leg_handler I get 0th bit set from MSGF_LEG_STATUS if INTA >>> interrupt is raised but my hwirq number being mapped for INTA is 0x1 >>> so that's I'm adding 1 to obtain correct virtual irq. Same case in >>> nwl_pcie_free_irq_domain since hwirq starts from one I'm adding 1 to >>> obtain virtual irq and free it. >> >> I can see that. Nonetheless, this is wrong. Can you please test the patch I >> provided in my reply and report what happens? > > Can you be more specific on what is the wrong, I'm adding one since > the hwirq starts from 0x1 as mentioned above. hwirq should always be the value that is reported by the HW. In your case, this ranges from 0 to 3, never 4. So if we can understand why you get called with 4 as a hwirq, we can fix this properly, for everyone. It is also worth noting that other drivers do not have to do this +1 dance. > I did try your suggestion with Ethernet card, but kernel hangs (it > does not show any crash also, just hangs) when I do interface up > (without bit + 1, using only bit position in handler). This is not > working because in the legacy domain virq mapping starts with hwirq > 0x1, there is no mapping for 0x0 in the domain, so EP interrupt is > not serviced since virq being returned is zero. Right. So let's go back to first principles and find out *who* decides about the hwirq starting at 1 instead of zero. Thanks, M.
> >>>> Hi Bharat, > >>>>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > >>>>> nwl_pcie > >>>> *pcie) > >>>>> } > >>>>> > >>>>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, > >>>>> - INTX_NUM, > >>>>> + INTX_NUM + 1, > >>>>> &legacy_domain_ops, > >>>>> pcie); > >>>> > >>>> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so > >>>> the domain allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the > >>>> way the driver currently deals with mappings is quite broken > >>>> (consistently adding 1 to > >> the HW interrupt). > >>>> > >>> Hi Marc, > >>> > >>> Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. > >>> > >>> [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > >>> > >>> [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > >>> > >>> [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 > >>> > >>> [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: > >>> > >>> [ 2.441706] > >>> > >>> [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 > >>> > >>> [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) > >>> > >>> [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: > >> ffffffc071888000 > >>> > >>> [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > >>> > >>> [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > >>> > >>> In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate > >>> > >>> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, > >>> "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain- > >name)) > >>> return -EINVAL; > >>> > >>> Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above > >>> condition > >> (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. > >>> This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). > >> > >> I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. > >> > >> Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have > >> interrupt sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n- > 1). > > > > Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy interrupts > > will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per > > PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered > > from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a multi-function device comes the crash > > occurs. > > So who provides this hwirq? Who calls irq_domain_associate() with hwirq set to > 4? > PCIe subsystem invokes pcibios_add_device function in arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c for every pci device. The purpose of this function is to assign dev->irq using of_irq_parse_and_map_pci. of_irq_parse_and_map_pci invokes of_irq_parse_pci where it reads PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN from configuration space and saves it in parameter of struct of_phandle_args. This structure is passed to irq_create_of_mapping where it invokes irq_create_fwspec_mapping. irq_create_fwspec_mapping invokes irq_domain_translate and gets hwirq, here the above saved PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value is assigned to hwirq (*hwirq = fwspec->param[0]). And then using this hwirq irq_create_mapping -> irq_domain_associate were invoked and mapping is created for virtual irq with this hwirq. So for any end point PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value starts from 0x1 to 0x4 and so hwirq starts from 0x1 to 0x4. So the values are more generic w.r.t to protocol, that's why hwirq will range from 0x1 to 0x4. And then if you check pcie-altera.c they are doing this adding one in their handler and while creating legacy domain. Thanks & Regards, Bharat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:19:55AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > > >>>> Hi Bharat, > > >>>>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > >>>>> nwl_pcie > > >>>> *pcie) > > >>>>> } > > >>>>> > > >>>>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, > > >>>>> - INTX_NUM, > > >>>>> + INTX_NUM + 1, > > >>>>> &legacy_domain_ops, > > >>>>> pcie); > > >>>> > > >>>> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so > > >>>> the domain allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the > > >>>> way the driver currently deals with mappings is quite broken > > >>>> (consistently adding 1 to > > >> the HW interrupt). > > >>>> > > >>> Hi Marc, > > >>> > > >>> Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441706] > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: > > >> ffffffc071888000 > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > >>> > > >>> [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > >>> > > >>> In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate > > >>> > > >>> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, > > >>> "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain- > > >name)) > > >>> return -EINVAL; > > >>> > > >>> Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above > > >>> condition > > >> (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. > > >>> This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). > > >> > > >> I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. > > >> > > >> Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have > > >> interrupt sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n- > > 1). > > > > > > Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy interrupts > > > will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per > > > PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered > > > from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a multi-function device comes the crash > > > occurs. > > > > So who provides this hwirq? Who calls irq_domain_associate() with hwirq set to > > 4? > > > PCIe subsystem invokes pcibios_add_device function in arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c for every pci device. > The purpose of this function is to assign dev->irq using of_irq_parse_and_map_pci. > of_irq_parse_and_map_pci invokes of_irq_parse_pci where it reads PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN from configuration space and saves it > in parameter of struct of_phandle_args. > This structure is passed to irq_create_of_mapping where it invokes irq_create_fwspec_mapping. > irq_create_fwspec_mapping invokes irq_domain_translate and gets hwirq, here the above saved PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value is assigned > to hwirq (*hwirq = fwspec->param[0]). > And then using this hwirq irq_create_mapping -> irq_domain_associate were invoked and mapping is created for virtual irq with this hwirq. > So for any end point PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value starts from 0x1 to 0x4 and so hwirq starts from 0x1 to 0x4. > > So the values are more generic w.r.t to protocol, that's why hwirq will range from 0x1 to 0x4. > And then if you check pcie-altera.c they are doing this adding one in their handler and while creating legacy domain. Is this resolved yet? Marc, are you happy, or should we iterate on this again? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 12/09/16 23:02, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:19:55AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Bharat, >>>>>>>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct >>>>>>>> nwl_pcie >>>>>>> *pcie) >>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, >>>>>>>> - INTX_NUM, >>>>>>>> + INTX_NUM + 1, >>>>>>>> &legacy_domain_ops, >>>>>>>> pcie); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so >>>>>>> the domain allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the >>>>>>> way the driver currently deals with mappings is quite broken >>>>>>> (consistently adding 1 to >>>>> the HW interrupt). >>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Marc, >>>>>> >>>>>> Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441706] >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: >>>>> ffffffc071888000 >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 >>>>>> >>>>>> In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate >>>>>> >>>>>> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, >>>>>> "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain- >>>> name)) >>>>>> return -EINVAL; >>>>>> >>>>>> Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above >>>>>> condition >>>>> (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. >>>>>> This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). >>>>> >>>>> I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. >>>>> >>>>> Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have >>>>> interrupt sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n- >>> 1). >>>> >>>> Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy interrupts >>>> will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per >>>> PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered >>>> from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a multi-function device comes the crash >>>> occurs. >>> >>> So who provides this hwirq? Who calls irq_domain_associate() with hwirq set to >>> 4? >>> >> PCIe subsystem invokes pcibios_add_device function in arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c for every pci device. >> The purpose of this function is to assign dev->irq using of_irq_parse_and_map_pci. >> of_irq_parse_and_map_pci invokes of_irq_parse_pci where it reads PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN from configuration space and saves it >> in parameter of struct of_phandle_args. >> This structure is passed to irq_create_of_mapping where it invokes irq_create_fwspec_mapping. >> irq_create_fwspec_mapping invokes irq_domain_translate and gets hwirq, here the above saved PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value is assigned >> to hwirq (*hwirq = fwspec->param[0]). >> And then using this hwirq irq_create_mapping -> irq_domain_associate were invoked and mapping is created for virtual irq with this hwirq. >> So for any end point PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value starts from 0x1 to 0x4 and so hwirq starts from 0x1 to 0x4. >> >> So the values are more generic w.r.t to protocol, that's why hwirq will range from 0x1 to 0x4. >> And then if you check pcie-altera.c they are doing this adding one in their handler and while creating legacy domain. > > Is this resolved yet? Marc, are you happy, or should we iterate on this > again? Ah, sorry to have dropped the ball on this patch. I guess that given that the infrastructure imposes the hwirq range on the host drivers, Bharat's approach is the only way (and a number of other host drivers are already slightly broken). I'll try and have a look at solving this at the generic level. In the meantime: Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Thanks, M.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:41:28AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 12/09/16 23:02, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:19:55AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi Bharat, > >>>>>>>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > >>>>>>>> nwl_pcie > >>>>>>> *pcie) > >>>>>>>> } > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, > >>>>>>>> - INTX_NUM, > >>>>>>>> + INTX_NUM + 1, > >>>>>>>> &legacy_domain_ops, > >>>>>>>> pcie); > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so > >>>>>>> the domain allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the > >>>>>>> way the driver currently deals with mappings is quite broken > >>>>>>> (consistently adding 1 to > >>>>> the HW interrupt). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Marc, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441706] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: > >>>>> ffffffc071888000 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate > >>>>>> > >>>>>> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, > >>>>>> "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain- > >>>> name)) > >>>>>> return -EINVAL; > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above > >>>>>> condition > >>>>> (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. > >>>>>> This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). > >>>>> > >>>>> I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. > >>>>> > >>>>> Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have > >>>>> interrupt sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n- > >>> 1). > >>>> > >>>> Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy interrupts > >>>> will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per > >>>> PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered > >>>> from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a multi-function device comes the crash > >>>> occurs. > >>> > >>> So who provides this hwirq? Who calls irq_domain_associate() with hwirq set to > >>> 4? > >>> > >> PCIe subsystem invokes pcibios_add_device function in arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c for every pci device. > >> The purpose of this function is to assign dev->irq using of_irq_parse_and_map_pci. > >> of_irq_parse_and_map_pci invokes of_irq_parse_pci where it reads PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN from configuration space and saves it > >> in parameter of struct of_phandle_args. > >> This structure is passed to irq_create_of_mapping where it invokes irq_create_fwspec_mapping. > >> irq_create_fwspec_mapping invokes irq_domain_translate and gets hwirq, here the above saved PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value is assigned > >> to hwirq (*hwirq = fwspec->param[0]). > >> And then using this hwirq irq_create_mapping -> irq_domain_associate were invoked and mapping is created for virtual irq with this hwirq. > >> So for any end point PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value starts from 0x1 to 0x4 and so hwirq starts from 0x1 to 0x4. > >> > >> So the values are more generic w.r.t to protocol, that's why hwirq will range from 0x1 to 0x4. > >> And then if you check pcie-altera.c they are doing this adding one in their handler and while creating legacy domain. > > > > Is this resolved yet? Marc, are you happy, or should we iterate on this > > again? > > Ah, sorry to have dropped the ball on this patch. No problem, I wasn't making forward progress anyway. > I guess that given that the infrastructure imposes the hwirq range on > the host drivers, Bharat's approach is the only way (and a number of > other host drivers are already slightly broken). I'll try and have a > look at solving this at the generic level. In the meantime: > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> After looking at this myself, I'm not happy with this either. It feels like there are bugs lurking here and we're just hiding one of them. Here are the callers of irq_domain_add_linear() for legacy INTx in drivers/pci/host: advk_pcie_init_irq_domain LEGACY_IRQ_NUM (4) dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 ks_dw_pcie_host_init MAX_LEGACY_IRQS (4) altera_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 I think all of these use the of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() path you mentioned, so if the problem is in the way that path works, I would think these should *all* be requesting the same number of interrupts in the domain. I agree with Marc that we should request 4 IRQs, because that's what we need. If we can't do that for some reason, we ought to at least make all these callers the same. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[+cc Ley Foon (altera), Thomas (aardvark), Kishon (dra7xx), Murali (keystone)] On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:05:11AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:41:28AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 12/09/16 23:02, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:19:55AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > > >>>>>>> Hi Bharat, > > >>>>>>>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > >>>>>>>> nwl_pcie > > >>>>>>> *pcie) > > >>>>>>>> } > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, > > >>>>>>>> - INTX_NUM, > > >>>>>>>> + INTX_NUM + 1, > > >>>>>>>> &legacy_domain_ops, > > >>>>>>>> pcie); > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so > > >>>>>>> the domain allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the > > >>>>>>> way the driver currently deals with mappings is quite broken > > >>>>>>> (consistently adding 1 to > > >>>>> the HW interrupt). > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi Marc, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441706] > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: > > >>>>> ffffffc071888000 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, > > >>>>>> "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain- > > >>>> name)) > > >>>>>> return -EINVAL; > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above > > >>>>>> condition > > >>>>> (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. > > >>>>>> This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have > > >>>>> interrupt sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n- > > >>> 1). > > >>>> > > >>>> Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy interrupts > > >>>> will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per > > >>>> PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered > > >>>> from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a multi-function device comes the crash > > >>>> occurs. > > >>> > > >>> So who provides this hwirq? Who calls irq_domain_associate() with hwirq set to > > >>> 4? > > >>> > > >> PCIe subsystem invokes pcibios_add_device function in arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c for every pci device. > > >> The purpose of this function is to assign dev->irq using of_irq_parse_and_map_pci. > > >> of_irq_parse_and_map_pci invokes of_irq_parse_pci where it reads PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN from configuration space and saves it > > >> in parameter of struct of_phandle_args. > > >> This structure is passed to irq_create_of_mapping where it invokes irq_create_fwspec_mapping. > > >> irq_create_fwspec_mapping invokes irq_domain_translate and gets hwirq, here the above saved PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value is assigned > > >> to hwirq (*hwirq = fwspec->param[0]). > > >> And then using this hwirq irq_create_mapping -> irq_domain_associate were invoked and mapping is created for virtual irq with this hwirq. > > >> So for any end point PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value starts from 0x1 to 0x4 and so hwirq starts from 0x1 to 0x4. > > >> > > >> So the values are more generic w.r.t to protocol, that's why hwirq will range from 0x1 to 0x4. > > >> And then if you check pcie-altera.c they are doing this adding one in their handler and while creating legacy domain. > > > > > > Is this resolved yet? Marc, are you happy, or should we iterate on this > > > again? > > > > Ah, sorry to have dropped the ball on this patch. > > No problem, I wasn't making forward progress anyway. > > > I guess that given that the infrastructure imposes the hwirq range on > > the host drivers, Bharat's approach is the only way (and a number of > > other host drivers are already slightly broken). I'll try and have a > > look at solving this at the generic level. In the meantime: > > > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > > After looking at this myself, I'm not happy with this either. It feels > like there are bugs lurking here and we're just hiding one of them. > > Here are the callers of irq_domain_add_linear() for legacy INTx in > drivers/pci/host: > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain LEGACY_IRQ_NUM (4) > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 > ks_dw_pcie_host_init MAX_LEGACY_IRQS (4) > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) > xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 The altera change corresponding to this was 99496bd2971f ("PCI: altera: Fix error when INTx is 4"). I should have noticed this inconsistency back then. Are aardvark, dra7xx, keystone, and xilinx (non-NWL) broken because they only request 4 IRQs and only INTA, INTB, and INTC work? > I think all of these use the of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() path you > mentioned, so if the problem is in the way that path works, I would > think these should *all* be requesting the same number of interrupts > in the domain. > > I agree with Marc that we should request 4 IRQs, because that's what > we need. If we can't do that for some reason, we ought to at least > make all these callers the same. > > Bjorn > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello, On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:34:02 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > After looking at this myself, I'm not happy with this either. It feels > > like there are bugs lurking here and we're just hiding one of them. > > > > Here are the callers of irq_domain_add_linear() for legacy INTx in > > drivers/pci/host: > > > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain LEGACY_IRQ_NUM (4) > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init MAX_LEGACY_IRQS (4) > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) > > xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 > > The altera change corresponding to this was 99496bd2971f ("PCI: altera: Fix > error when INTx is 4"). I should have noticed this inconsistency back > then. > > Are aardvark, dra7xx, keystone, and xilinx (non-NWL) broken because they > only request 4 IRQs and only INTA, INTB, and INTC work? > > > I think all of these use the of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() path you > > mentioned, so if the problem is in the way that path works, I would > > think these should *all* be requesting the same number of interrupts > > in the domain. > > > > I agree with Marc that we should request 4 IRQs, because that's what > > we need. If we can't do that for some reason, we ought to at least > > make all these callers the same. Thanks for Cc'ing about this issue. Indeed, the Aardvark driver supports all of INT{A,B,C,D}, so the current situation doesn't work. As suggested, the simplest solution is to just allocate an irq domain with 5 IRQs, like is done in the Altera driver. However, my feeling is that a more correct solution would be to have a translation between the PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value (in the range 0x1 to 0x4) to the hwirq value (in the range 0x0 to 0x3). Best regards, Thomas
> [+cc Ley Foon (altera), Thomas (aardvark), Kishon (dra7xx), Murali (keystone)] > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:05:11AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:41:28AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > On 12/09/16 23:02, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:19:55AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > > > >>>>>>> Hi Bharat, > > > >>>>>>>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int > > > >>>>>>>> nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct nwl_pcie > > > >>>>>>> *pcie) > > > >>>>>>>> } > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = > irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, > > > >>>>>>>> - INTX_NUM, > > > >>>>>>>> + > > > >>>>>>>> + INTX_NUM + 1, > > > >>>>>>>> &legacy_domain_ops, > > > >>>>>>>> pcie); > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM > > > >>>>>>> irqs, so the domain allocation should reflect this. On the > > > >>>>>>> other hand, the way the driver currently deals with mappings > > > >>>>>>> is quite broken (consistently adding 1 to > > > >>>>> the HW interrupt). > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Marc, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441706] > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: > > > >>>>> ffffffc071888000 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, > > > >>>>>> "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", > > > >>>>>> (int)hwirq, domain- > > > >>>> name)) > > > >>>>>> return -EINVAL; > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above > > > >>>>>> condition > > > >>>>> (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. > > > >>>>>> This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong > fix. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have > > > >>>>> interrupt sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered > > > >>>>> from 0 to (n- > > > >>> 1). > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy > > > >>>> interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these > > > >>>> values are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So > > > >>>> these cannot be numbered from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a > > > >>>> multi-function device comes the crash occurs. > > > >>> > > > >>> So who provides this hwirq? Who calls irq_domain_associate() > > > >>> with hwirq set to 4? > > > >>> > > > >> PCIe subsystem invokes pcibios_add_device function in > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c for every pci device. > > > >> The purpose of this function is to assign dev->irq using > of_irq_parse_and_map_pci. > > > >> of_irq_parse_and_map_pci invokes of_irq_parse_pci where it reads > > > >> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN from configuration space and saves it in parameter > of struct of_phandle_args. > > > >> This structure is passed to irq_create_of_mapping where it invokes > irq_create_fwspec_mapping. > > > >> irq_create_fwspec_mapping invokes irq_domain_translate and gets > > > >> hwirq, here the above saved PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value is assigned to > hwirq (*hwirq = fwspec->param[0]). > > > >> And then using this hwirq irq_create_mapping -> irq_domain_associate > were invoked and mapping is created for virtual irq with this hwirq. > > > >> So for any end point PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value starts from 0x1 to 0x4 > and so hwirq starts from 0x1 to 0x4. > > > >> > > > >> So the values are more generic w.r.t to protocol, that's why hwirq will > range from 0x1 to 0x4. > > > >> And then if you check pcie-altera.c they are doing this adding one in their > handler and while creating legacy domain. > > > > > > > > Is this resolved yet? Marc, are you happy, or should we iterate > > > > on this again? > > > > > > Ah, sorry to have dropped the ball on this patch. > > > > No problem, I wasn't making forward progress anyway. > > > > > I guess that given that the infrastructure imposes the hwirq range > > > on the host drivers, Bharat's approach is the only way (and a number > > > of other host drivers are already slightly broken). I'll try and > > > have a look at solving this at the generic level. In the meantime: > > > > > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > > > > After looking at this myself, I'm not happy with this either. It > > feels like there are bugs lurking here and we're just hiding one of them. > > > > Here are the callers of irq_domain_add_linear() for legacy INTx in > > drivers/pci/host: > > > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain LEGACY_IRQ_NUM (4) > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init MAX_LEGACY_IRQS (4) > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) > > xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 > > The altera change corresponding to this was 99496bd2971f ("PCI: altera: Fix > error when INTx is 4"). I should have noticed this inconsistency back then. > > Are aardvark, dra7xx, keystone, and xilinx (non-NWL) broken because they only > request 4 IRQs and only INTA, INTB, and INTC work? > Hi Bjorn, xilinx (non-NWL) will also work with all 4 INTA, INTB, INTc and INTD, but I haven't sent patches for this yet, because by that time marc has already raised issue regarding the fix w.r.t this. So once a proper fix was agreed upon for Xilinx-nwl, I will send fix for this also. Thanks & Regards, Bharat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, On Tuesday 13 September 2016 09:04 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Ley Foon (altera), Thomas (aardvark), Kishon (dra7xx), Murali (keystone)] > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:05:11AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:41:28AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On 12/09/16 23:02, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:19:55AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Bharat, >>>>>>>>>>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct >>>>>>>>>>> nwl_pcie >>>>>>>>>> *pcie) >>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, >>>>>>>>>>> - INTX_NUM, >>>>>>>>>>> + INTX_NUM + 1, >>>>>>>>>>> &legacy_domain_ops, >>>>>>>>>>> pcie); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, so >>>>>>>>>> the domain allocation should reflect this. On the other hand, the >>>>>>>>>> way the driver currently deals with mappings is quite broken >>>>>>>>>> (consistently adding 1 to >>>>>>>> the HW interrupt). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Marc, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441706] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: >>>>>>>> ffffffc071888000 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, >>>>>>>>> "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", (int)hwirq, domain- >>>>>>> name)) >>>>>>>>> return -EINVAL; >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above >>>>>>>>> condition >>>>>>>> (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. >>>>>>>>> This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong fix. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have >>>>>>>> interrupt sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered from 0 to (n- >>>>>> 1). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy interrupts >>>>>>> will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per >>>>>>> PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered >>>>>>> from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a multi-function device comes the crash >>>>>>> occurs. >>>>>> >>>>>> So who provides this hwirq? Who calls irq_domain_associate() with hwirq set to >>>>>> 4? >>>>>> >>>>> PCIe subsystem invokes pcibios_add_device function in arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c for every pci device. >>>>> The purpose of this function is to assign dev->irq using of_irq_parse_and_map_pci. >>>>> of_irq_parse_and_map_pci invokes of_irq_parse_pci where it reads PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN from configuration space and saves it >>>>> in parameter of struct of_phandle_args. >>>>> This structure is passed to irq_create_of_mapping where it invokes irq_create_fwspec_mapping. >>>>> irq_create_fwspec_mapping invokes irq_domain_translate and gets hwirq, here the above saved PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value is assigned >>>>> to hwirq (*hwirq = fwspec->param[0]). >>>>> And then using this hwirq irq_create_mapping -> irq_domain_associate were invoked and mapping is created for virtual irq with this hwirq. >>>>> So for any end point PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value starts from 0x1 to 0x4 and so hwirq starts from 0x1 to 0x4. >>>>> >>>>> So the values are more generic w.r.t to protocol, that's why hwirq will range from 0x1 to 0x4. >>>>> And then if you check pcie-altera.c they are doing this adding one in their handler and while creating legacy domain. >>>> >>>> Is this resolved yet? Marc, are you happy, or should we iterate on this >>>> again? >>> >>> Ah, sorry to have dropped the ball on this patch. >> >> No problem, I wasn't making forward progress anyway. >> >>> I guess that given that the infrastructure imposes the hwirq range on >>> the host drivers, Bharat's approach is the only way (and a number of >>> other host drivers are already slightly broken). I'll try and have a >>> look at solving this at the generic level. In the meantime: >>> >>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> >> >> After looking at this myself, I'm not happy with this either. It feels >> like there are bugs lurking here and we're just hiding one of them. >> >> Here are the callers of irq_domain_add_linear() for legacy INTx in >> drivers/pci/host: >> >> advk_pcie_init_irq_domain LEGACY_IRQ_NUM (4) >> dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 >> ks_dw_pcie_host_init MAX_LEGACY_IRQS (4) >> altera_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) >> nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) >> xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 > > The altera change corresponding to this was 99496bd2971f ("PCI: altera: Fix > error when INTx is 4"). I should have noticed this inconsistency back > then. > > Are aardvark, dra7xx, keystone, and xilinx (non-NWL) broken because they > only request 4 IRQs and only INTA, INTB, and INTC work? yeah.. it's broken in dra7xx. I get [1] when I configure the pci endpoint to use INTD. Thanks Kishon [1] -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23177268/ > >> I think all of these use the of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() path you >> mentioned, so if the problem is in the way that path works, I would >> think these should *all* be requesting the same number of interrupts >> in the domain. >> >> I agree with Marc that we should request 4 IRQs, because that's what >> we need. If we can't do that for some reason, we ought to at least >> make all these callers the same. >> >> Bjorn >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, Any one is working on fix for this issue ? Regards, Bharat > -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@kernel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 8:35 PM > To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com>; robh@kernel.org; > bhelgaas@google.com; colin.king@canonical.com; Soren Brinkmann > <sorenb@xilinx.com>; Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>; arnd@arndb.de; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: Xilinx NWL PCIe: Fix Error for multi function device > for legacy interrupts. > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:41:28AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 12/09/16 23:02, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:19:55AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > > >>>>>>> Hi Bharat, > > >>>>>>>> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int > > >>>>>>>> nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct nwl_pcie > > >>>>>>> *pcie) > > >>>>>>>> } > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> pcie->legacy_irq_domain = > irq_domain_add_linear(legacy_intc_node, > > >>>>>>>> - INTX_NUM, > > >>>>>>>> + INTX_NUM > > >>>>>>>> + + 1, > > >>>>>>>> &legacy_domain_ops, > > >>>>>>>> pcie); > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> This feels like the wrong thing to do. You have INTX_NUM irqs, > > >>>>>>> so the domain allocation should reflect this. On the other > > >>>>>>> hand, the way the driver currently deals with mappings is > > >>>>>>> quite broken (consistently adding 1 to > > >>>>> the HW interrupt). > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi Marc, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Without above change I get following crash in kernel while booting. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441684] error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441694] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441698] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:344 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441702] Modules linked in: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441706] > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441714] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0 #8 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441718] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441723] task: ffffffc071886b80 ti: ffffffc071888000 task.ti: > > >>>>> ffffffc071888000 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441732] PC is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> [ 2.441738] LR is at irq_domain_associate+0x138/0x1c0 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> In kernel/irq/irqdomain.c function irq_domain_associate > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> if (WARN(hwirq >= domain->hwirq_max, > > >>>>>> "error: hwirq 0x%x is too large for %s\n", > > >>>>>> (int)hwirq, domain- > > >>>> name)) > > >>>>>> return -EINVAL; > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Here the hwirq and hwirq_max are equal to 4 without the above > > >>>>>> condition > > >>>>> (INTX_NUM + 1) due to which crash is coming. > > >>>>>> This is happening as the legacy interrupts are starting from 1 (INTA). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I understood that. I'm still persisting in saying that you have the wrong > fix. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Your domain should always allocate many interrupts as you have > > >>>>> interrupt sources. These interrupts (hwirq) should be numbered > > >>>>> from 0 to (n- > > >>> 1). > > >>>> > > >>>> Agreed, but here comes the problem the hwirq for legacy > > >>>> interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these > > >>>> values are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So > > >>>> these cannot be numbered from 0. So when 0x4 (INTD) for a > > >>>> multi-function device comes the crash occurs. > > >>> > > >>> So who provides this hwirq? Who calls irq_domain_associate() with > > >>> hwirq set to 4? > > >>> > > >> PCIe subsystem invokes pcibios_add_device function in > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c for every pci device. > > >> The purpose of this function is to assign dev->irq using > of_irq_parse_and_map_pci. > > >> of_irq_parse_and_map_pci invokes of_irq_parse_pci where it reads > > >> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN from configuration space and saves it in parameter of > struct of_phandle_args. > > >> This structure is passed to irq_create_of_mapping where it invokes > irq_create_fwspec_mapping. > > >> irq_create_fwspec_mapping invokes irq_domain_translate and gets > > >> hwirq, here the above saved PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value is assigned to hwirq > (*hwirq = fwspec->param[0]). > > >> And then using this hwirq irq_create_mapping -> irq_domain_associate > were invoked and mapping is created for virtual irq with this hwirq. > > >> So for any end point PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN value starts from 0x1 to 0x4 and > so hwirq starts from 0x1 to 0x4. > > >> > > >> So the values are more generic w.r.t to protocol, that's why hwirq will > range from 0x1 to 0x4. > > >> And then if you check pcie-altera.c they are doing this adding one in their > handler and while creating legacy domain. > > > > > > Is this resolved yet? Marc, are you happy, or should we iterate on > > > this again? > > > > Ah, sorry to have dropped the ball on this patch. > > No problem, I wasn't making forward progress anyway. > > > I guess that given that the infrastructure imposes the hwirq range on > > the host drivers, Bharat's approach is the only way (and a number of > > other host drivers are already slightly broken). I'll try and have a > > look at solving this at the generic level. In the meantime: > > > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > > After looking at this myself, I'm not happy with this either. It feels like there are > bugs lurking here and we're just hiding one of them. > > Here are the callers of irq_domain_add_linear() for legacy INTx in > drivers/pci/host: > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain LEGACY_IRQ_NUM (4) > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 > ks_dw_pcie_host_init MAX_LEGACY_IRQS (4) > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain INTX_NUM + 1 (5) > xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain 4 > > I think all of these use the of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() path you mentioned, so > if the problem is in the way that path works, I would think these should *all* be > requesting the same number of interrupts in the domain. > > I agree with Marc that we should request 4 IRQs, because that's what we need. > If we can't do that for some reason, we ought to at least make all these callers > the same. > > Bjorn
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c index 0b597d9..72b159f 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c @@ -314,8 +314,7 @@ static void nwl_pcie_leg_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) while ((status = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, MSGF_LEG_STATUS) & MSGF_LEG_SR_MASKALL) != 0) { for_each_set_bit(bit, &status, INTX_NUM) { - virq = irq_find_mapping(pcie->legacy_irq_domain, - bit + 1); + virq = irq_find_mapping(pcie->legacy_irq_domain, bit); if (virq) generic_handle_irq(virq); } @@ -483,7 +482,7 @@ static void nwl_pcie_free_irq_domain(struct nwl_pcie *pcie) u32 irq; for (i = 0; i < INTX_NUM; i++) { - irq = irq_find_mapping(pcie->legacy_irq_domain, i + 1); + irq = irq_find_mapping(pcie->legacy_irq_domain, i); if (irq > 0) irq_dispose_mapping(irq); }