diff mbox

[V8,5/8] irqchip/gicv3-its: Refactor ITS DT init code to prepare for ACPI

Message ID 1470909998-16710-6-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Tomasz Nowicki Aug. 11, 2016, 10:06 a.m. UTC
In order to add ACPI support we need to isolate ACPI&DT common code and
move DT logic to corresponding functions. To achieve this we are using
firmware agnostic handle which can be unpacked to either DT or ACPI node.

No functional changes other than a very minor one:
1. Terminate its_init call with -ENODEV for non-DT case which allows
to remove hack from its-gic-v3.c.
2. Fix ITS base register address type (from 'unsigned long' to 'phys_addr_t'),
as a bonus we get nice string formatting.
3. Since there is only one of ITS parent domain convert it to static global
variable and drop the parameter from its_probe_one. Users can refer to it
in more convenient way then.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c   | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c       |  7 ++--
 include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h |  4 +--
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

Comments

Hanjun Guo Aug. 17, 2016, 8:33 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2016/8/11 18:06, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> In order to add ACPI support we need to isolate ACPI&DT common code and
> move DT logic to corresponding functions. To achieve this we are using
> firmware agnostic handle which can be unpacked to either DT or ACPI node.
>
> No functional changes other than a very minor one:
> 1. Terminate its_init call with -ENODEV for non-DT case which allows
> to remove hack from its-gic-v3.c.
> 2. Fix ITS base register address type (from 'unsigned long' to 'phys_addr_t'),
> as a bonus we get nice string formatting.
> 3. Since there is only one of ITS parent domain convert it to static global
> variable and drop the parameter from its_probe_one. Users can refer to it
> in more convenient way then.
[...]
> -static int __init its_probe(struct device_node *node,
> -			    struct irq_domain *parent)
> +static int __init its_probe_one(struct resource *res,
> +				struct fwnode_handle *handle, int numa_node)
>  {
> -	struct resource res;
>  	struct its_node *its;
>  	void __iomem *its_base;
>  	u32 val;
>  	u64 baser, tmp;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
> -	if (err) {
> -		pr_warn("%s: no regs?\n", node->full_name);
> -		return -ENXIO;
> -	}
> -
> -	its_base = ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
> +	its_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
>  	if (!its_base) {
> -		pr_warn("%s: unable to map registers\n", node->full_name);
> +		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Unable to map ITS registers\n", &res->start);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
>  	val = readl_relaxed(its_base + GITS_PIDR2) & GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_MASK;
>  	if (val != 0x30 && val != 0x40) {
> -		pr_warn("%s: no ITS detected, giving up\n", node->full_name);
> +		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: No ITS detected, giving up\n", &res->start);
>  		err = -ENODEV;
>  		goto out_unmap;
>  	}
>  
>  	err = its_force_quiescent(its_base);
>  	if (err) {
> -		pr_warn("%s: failed to quiesce, giving up\n",
> -			node->full_name);
> +		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Failed to quiesce, giving up\n", &res->start);
>  		goto out_unmap;
>  	}
>  
> -	pr_info("ITS: %s\n", node->full_name);
> +	pr_info("ITS@%pa\n", &res->start);
                ^^

When I was testing this patch set I found message printed as below:

[    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000
[    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000: allocated 524288 Devices @27dc400000 (flat, esz 8, psz 16K, shr 1)
[    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000: allocated 2048 Virtual CPUs @27dc820000 (flat, esz 8, psz 4K, shr 1)
[    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000: allocated 512 Interrupt Collections @27dc80f000 (flat, esz 8, psz 4K, shr 1)

Seems this print is redundant, can we remove it?

Thanks
Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Bjorn Helgaas Aug. 17, 2016, 3:58 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:33:02PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2016/8/11 18:06, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> > In order to add ACPI support we need to isolate ACPI&DT common code and
> > move DT logic to corresponding functions. To achieve this we are using
> > firmware agnostic handle which can be unpacked to either DT or ACPI node.
> >
> > No functional changes other than a very minor one:
> > 1. Terminate its_init call with -ENODEV for non-DT case which allows
> > to remove hack from its-gic-v3.c.
> > 2. Fix ITS base register address type (from 'unsigned long' to 'phys_addr_t'),
> > as a bonus we get nice string formatting.
> > 3. Since there is only one of ITS parent domain convert it to static global
> > variable and drop the parameter from its_probe_one. Users can refer to it
> > in more convenient way then.
> [...]
> > -static int __init its_probe(struct device_node *node,
> > -			    struct irq_domain *parent)
> > +static int __init its_probe_one(struct resource *res,
> > +				struct fwnode_handle *handle, int numa_node)
> >  {
> > -	struct resource res;
> >  	struct its_node *its;
> >  	void __iomem *its_base;
> >  	u32 val;
> >  	u64 baser, tmp;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> > -	err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
> > -	if (err) {
> > -		pr_warn("%s: no regs?\n", node->full_name);
> > -		return -ENXIO;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	its_base = ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
> > +	its_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> >  	if (!its_base) {
> > -		pr_warn("%s: unable to map registers\n", node->full_name);
> > +		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Unable to map ITS registers\n", &res->start);
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	val = readl_relaxed(its_base + GITS_PIDR2) & GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_MASK;
> >  	if (val != 0x30 && val != 0x40) {
> > -		pr_warn("%s: no ITS detected, giving up\n", node->full_name);
> > +		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: No ITS detected, giving up\n", &res->start);
> >  		err = -ENODEV;
> >  		goto out_unmap;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	err = its_force_quiescent(its_base);
> >  	if (err) {
> > -		pr_warn("%s: failed to quiesce, giving up\n",
> > -			node->full_name);
> > +		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Failed to quiesce, giving up\n", &res->start);
> >  		goto out_unmap;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	pr_info("ITS: %s\n", node->full_name);
> > +	pr_info("ITS@%pa\n", &res->start);
>                 ^^
> 
> When I was testing this patch set I found message printed as below:
> 
> [    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000

I think it'd be nicer to print the resource with %pR so we see the
type and size in a way that matches other physical address usage.

I don't know whether there is or should be a struct device associated
with the ITS.  The its_probe_one() function looks similar to regular
driver probe functions, so maybe there should be.

If there were a struct device associated with the ITS, it'd be nicer
to use dev_info() as well, of course.

> [    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000: allocated 524288 Devices @27dc400000 (flat, esz 8, psz 16K, shr 1)
> [    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000: allocated 2048 Virtual CPUs @27dc820000 (flat, esz 8, psz 4K, shr 1)
> [    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000: allocated 512 Interrupt Collections @27dc80f000 (flat, esz 8, psz 4K, shr 1)
> 
> Seems this print is redundant, can we remove it?
> 
> Thanks
> Hanjun
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tomasz Nowicki Aug. 18, 2016, 6:42 a.m. UTC | #3
On 17.08.2016 17:58, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:33:02PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2016/8/11 18:06, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>> In order to add ACPI support we need to isolate ACPI&DT common code and
>>> move DT logic to corresponding functions. To achieve this we are using
>>> firmware agnostic handle which can be unpacked to either DT or ACPI node.
>>>
>>> No functional changes other than a very minor one:
>>> 1. Terminate its_init call with -ENODEV for non-DT case which allows
>>> to remove hack from its-gic-v3.c.
>>> 2. Fix ITS base register address type (from 'unsigned long' to 'phys_addr_t'),
>>> as a bonus we get nice string formatting.
>>> 3. Since there is only one of ITS parent domain convert it to static global
>>> variable and drop the parameter from its_probe_one. Users can refer to it
>>> in more convenient way then.
>> [...]
>>> -static int __init its_probe(struct device_node *node,
>>> -			    struct irq_domain *parent)
>>> +static int __init its_probe_one(struct resource *res,
>>> +				struct fwnode_handle *handle, int numa_node)
>>>  {
>>> -	struct resource res;
>>>  	struct its_node *its;
>>>  	void __iomem *its_base;
>>>  	u32 val;
>>>  	u64 baser, tmp;
>>>  	int err;
>>>
>>> -	err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
>>> -	if (err) {
>>> -		pr_warn("%s: no regs?\n", node->full_name);
>>> -		return -ENXIO;
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>> -	its_base = ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
>>> +	its_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
>>>  	if (!its_base) {
>>> -		pr_warn("%s: unable to map registers\n", node->full_name);
>>> +		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Unable to map ITS registers\n", &res->start);
>>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>>  	val = readl_relaxed(its_base + GITS_PIDR2) & GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_MASK;
>>>  	if (val != 0x30 && val != 0x40) {
>>> -		pr_warn("%s: no ITS detected, giving up\n", node->full_name);
>>> +		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: No ITS detected, giving up\n", &res->start);
>>>  		err = -ENODEV;
>>>  		goto out_unmap;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>>  	err = its_force_quiescent(its_base);
>>>  	if (err) {
>>> -		pr_warn("%s: failed to quiesce, giving up\n",
>>> -			node->full_name);
>>> +		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Failed to quiesce, giving up\n", &res->start);
>>>  		goto out_unmap;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>> -	pr_info("ITS: %s\n", node->full_name);
>>> +	pr_info("ITS@%pa\n", &res->start);
>>                 ^^
>>
>> When I was testing this patch set I found message printed as below:
>>
>> [    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000
>
> I think it'd be nicer to print the resource with %pR so we see the
> type and size in a way that matches other physical address usage.

The intention was to keep previous message layout but while we are here, 
%pR usage for this one pr_info seems nice to me.

>
> I don't know whether there is or should be a struct device associated
> with the ITS.  The its_probe_one() function looks similar to regular
> driver probe functions, so maybe there should be.
>
> If there were a struct device associated with the ITS, it'd be nicer
> to use dev_info() as well, of course.

Indeed dev_info() would be nice but there is no struct device for ITS.

Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hanjun Guo Aug. 18, 2016, 6:55 a.m. UTC | #4
On 2016/8/18 14:42, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> On 17.08.2016 17:58, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:33:02PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> On 2016/8/11 18:06, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>>> In order to add ACPI support we need to isolate ACPI&DT common code and
>>>> move DT logic to corresponding functions. To achieve this we are using
>>>> firmware agnostic handle which can be unpacked to either DT or ACPI node.
>>>>
>>>> No functional changes other than a very minor one:
>>>> 1. Terminate its_init call with -ENODEV for non-DT case which allows
>>>> to remove hack from its-gic-v3.c.
>>>> 2. Fix ITS base register address type (from 'unsigned long' to 'phys_addr_t'),
>>>> as a bonus we get nice string formatting.
>>>> 3. Since there is only one of ITS parent domain convert it to static global
>>>> variable and drop the parameter from its_probe_one. Users can refer to it
>>>> in more convenient way then.
>>> [...]
>>>> -static int __init its_probe(struct device_node *node,
>>>> -                struct irq_domain *parent)
>>>> +static int __init its_probe_one(struct resource *res,
>>>> +                struct fwnode_handle *handle, int numa_node)
>>>>  {
>>>> -    struct resource res;
>>>>      struct its_node *its;
>>>>      void __iomem *its_base;
>>>>      u32 val;
>>>>      u64 baser, tmp;
>>>>      int err;
>>>>
>>>> -    err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
>>>> -    if (err) {
>>>> -        pr_warn("%s: no regs?\n", node->full_name);
>>>> -        return -ENXIO;
>>>> -    }
>>>> -
>>>> -    its_base = ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
>>>> +    its_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
>>>>      if (!its_base) {
>>>> -        pr_warn("%s: unable to map registers\n", node->full_name);
>>>> +        pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Unable to map ITS registers\n", &res->start);
>>>>          return -ENOMEM;
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>>      val = readl_relaxed(its_base + GITS_PIDR2) & GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_MASK;
>>>>      if (val != 0x30 && val != 0x40) {
>>>> -        pr_warn("%s: no ITS detected, giving up\n", node->full_name);
>>>> +        pr_warn("ITS@%pa: No ITS detected, giving up\n", &res->start);
>>>>          err = -ENODEV;
>>>>          goto out_unmap;
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>>      err = its_force_quiescent(its_base);
>>>>      if (err) {
>>>> -        pr_warn("%s: failed to quiesce, giving up\n",
>>>> -            node->full_name);
>>>> +        pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Failed to quiesce, giving up\n", &res->start);
>>>>          goto out_unmap;
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> -    pr_info("ITS: %s\n", node->full_name);
>>>> +    pr_info("ITS@%pa\n", &res->start);
>>>                 ^^
>>>
>>> When I was testing this patch set I found message printed as below:
>>>
>>> [    0.000000] ITS@0x00000000c6000000
>>
>> I think it'd be nicer to print the resource with %pR so we see the
>> type and size in a way that matches other physical address usage.
>
> The intention was to keep previous message layout but while we are here, %pR usage for this one pr_info seems nice to me.
>
>>
>> I don't know whether there is or should be a struct device associated
>> with the ITS.  The its_probe_one() function looks similar to regular
>> driver probe functions, so maybe there should be.
>>
>> If there were a struct device associated with the ITS, it'd be nicer
>> to use dev_info() as well, of course.
>
> Indeed dev_info() would be nice but there is no struct device for ITS.

Yes, it's configured in the MADT table not in the DSDT, which has no struct
device associated with it.

Thanks
Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index bd43de1..1e0888d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@  struct its_node {
 	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
 	struct list_head	entry;
 	void __iomem		*base;
-	unsigned long		phys_base;
+	phys_addr_t		phys_base;
 	struct its_cmd_block	*cmd_base;
 	struct its_cmd_block	*cmd_write;
 	struct its_baser	tables[GITS_BASER_NR_REGS];
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@  struct its_device {
 static LIST_HEAD(its_nodes);
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(its_lock);
 static struct rdists *gic_rdists;
+static struct irq_domain *its_parent;
 
 #define gic_data_rdist()		(raw_cpu_ptr(gic_rdists->rdist))
 #define gic_data_rdist_rd_base()	(gic_data_rdist()->rd_base)
@@ -1609,8 +1610,7 @@  static void its_enable_quirks(struct its_node *its)
 	gic_enable_quirks(iidr, its_quirks, its);
 }
 
-static int its_init_domain(struct device_node *node, struct its_node *its,
-			   struct irq_domain *parent)
+static int its_init_domain(struct fwnode_handle *handle, struct its_node *its)
 {
 	struct irq_domain *inner_domain;
 	struct msi_domain_info *info;
@@ -1619,13 +1619,13 @@  static int its_init_domain(struct device_node *node, struct its_node *its,
 	if (!info)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	inner_domain = irq_domain_add_tree(node, &its_domain_ops, its);
+	inner_domain = irq_domain_create_tree(handle, &its_domain_ops, its);
 	if (!inner_domain) {
 		kfree(info);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	inner_domain->parent = parent;
+	inner_domain->parent = its_parent;
 	inner_domain->bus_token = DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS;
 	info->ops = &its_msi_domain_ops;
 	info->data = its;
@@ -1634,43 +1634,35 @@  static int its_init_domain(struct device_node *node, struct its_node *its,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int __init its_probe(struct device_node *node,
-			    struct irq_domain *parent)
+static int __init its_probe_one(struct resource *res,
+				struct fwnode_handle *handle, int numa_node)
 {
-	struct resource res;
 	struct its_node *its;
 	void __iomem *its_base;
 	u32 val;
 	u64 baser, tmp;
 	int err;
 
-	err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
-	if (err) {
-		pr_warn("%s: no regs?\n", node->full_name);
-		return -ENXIO;
-	}
-
-	its_base = ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
+	its_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
 	if (!its_base) {
-		pr_warn("%s: unable to map registers\n", node->full_name);
+		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Unable to map ITS registers\n", &res->start);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	val = readl_relaxed(its_base + GITS_PIDR2) & GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_MASK;
 	if (val != 0x30 && val != 0x40) {
-		pr_warn("%s: no ITS detected, giving up\n", node->full_name);
+		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: No ITS detected, giving up\n", &res->start);
 		err = -ENODEV;
 		goto out_unmap;
 	}
 
 	err = its_force_quiescent(its_base);
 	if (err) {
-		pr_warn("%s: failed to quiesce, giving up\n",
-			node->full_name);
+		pr_warn("ITS@%pa: Failed to quiesce, giving up\n", &res->start);
 		goto out_unmap;
 	}
 
-	pr_info("ITS: %s\n", node->full_name);
+	pr_info("ITS@%pa\n", &res->start);
 
 	its = kzalloc(sizeof(*its), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!its) {
@@ -1682,9 +1674,9 @@  static int __init its_probe(struct device_node *node,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&its->entry);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&its->its_device_list);
 	its->base = its_base;
-	its->phys_base = res.start;
+	its->phys_base = res->start;
 	its->ite_size = ((readl_relaxed(its_base + GITS_TYPER) >> 4) & 0xf) + 1;
-	its->numa_node = of_node_to_nid(node);
+	its->numa_node = numa_node;
 
 	its->cmd_base = kzalloc(ITS_CMD_QUEUE_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!its->cmd_base) {
@@ -1731,7 +1723,7 @@  static int __init its_probe(struct device_node *node,
 	writeq_relaxed(0, its->base + GITS_CWRITER);
 	writel_relaxed(GITS_CTLR_ENABLE, its->base + GITS_CTLR);
 
-	err = its_init_domain(node, its, parent);
+	err = its_init_domain(handle, its);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_free_tables;
 
@@ -1749,7 +1741,7 @@  out_free_its:
 	kfree(its);
 out_unmap:
 	iounmap(its_base);
-	pr_err("ITS: failed probing %s (%d)\n", node->full_name, err);
+	pr_err("ITS@%pa: failed probing (%d)\n", &res->start, err);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -1777,10 +1769,10 @@  static struct of_device_id its_device_id[] = {
 	{},
 };
 
-int __init its_init(struct device_node *node, struct rdists *rdists,
-	     struct irq_domain *parent_domain)
+static int __init its_of_probe(struct device_node *node)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
+	struct resource res;
 
 	for (np = of_find_matching_node(node, its_device_id); np;
 	     np = of_find_matching_node(np, its_device_id)) {
@@ -1790,8 +1782,27 @@  int __init its_init(struct device_node *node, struct rdists *rdists,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		its_probe(np, parent_domain);
+		if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res)) {
+			pr_warn("%s: no regs?\n", np->full_name);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		its_probe_one(&res, &np->fwnode, of_node_to_nid(np));
 	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int __init its_init(struct fwnode_handle *handle, struct rdists *rdists,
+		    struct irq_domain *parent_domain)
+{
+	struct device_node *of_node;
+
+	its_parent = parent_domain;
+	of_node = to_of_node(handle);
+	if (of_node)
+		its_of_probe(of_node);
+	else
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	if (list_empty(&its_nodes)) {
 		pr_warn("ITS: No ITS available, not enabling LPIs\n");
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 6fc56c3..add7a11 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -903,7 +903,6 @@  static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
 				 u64 redist_stride,
 				 struct fwnode_handle *handle)
 {
-	struct device_node *node;
 	u32 typer;
 	int gic_irqs;
 	int err;
@@ -944,10 +943,8 @@  static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
 
 	set_handle_irq(gic_handle_irq);
 
-	node = to_of_node(handle);
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis() &&
-	    node) /* Temp hack to prevent ITS init for ACPI */
-		its_init(node, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain);
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis())
+		its_init(handle, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain);
 
 	gic_smp_init();
 	gic_dist_init();
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
index 56b0b7e..dcd4c75 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
@@ -429,9 +429,9 @@  struct rdists {
 };
 
 struct irq_domain;
-struct device_node;
+struct fwnode_handle;
 int its_cpu_init(void);
-int its_init(struct device_node *node, struct rdists *rdists,
+int its_init(struct fwnode_handle *handle, struct rdists *rdists,
 	     struct irq_domain *domain);
 
 static inline bool gic_enable_sre(void)