@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ int __node_distance(int from, int to)
return numa_latency[from][to];
}
-static int find_best_numa_node_for_mlgroup(struct mdesc_mlgroup *grp)
+static int __init find_best_numa_node_for_mlgroup(struct mdesc_mlgroup *grp)
{
int i;
@@ -1173,8 +1173,8 @@ static int find_best_numa_node_for_mlgroup(struct mdesc_mlgroup *grp)
return i;
}
-static void find_numa_latencies_for_group(struct mdesc_handle *md, u64 grp,
- int index)
+static void __init find_numa_latencies_for_group(struct mdesc_handle *md,
+ u64 grp, int index)
{
u64 arc;
To fix: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x580): Section mismatch in reference from the function find_numa_latencies_for_group() to the function .init.text:find_mlgroup() The function find_numa_latencies_for_group() references the function __init find_mlgroup(). This is often because find_numa_latencies_for_group lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of find_mlgroup is wrong. It turns out find_numa_latencies_for_group is only called from: static int __init numa_parse_mdesc(void) and hence we can tag find_numa_latencies_for_group with __init. In doing so we see that find_best_numa_node_for_mlgroup is only called from within __init and hence can also be marked with __init. Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com> Cc: Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> --- arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)