Message ID | VI1PR0802MB2176D19FED39FAAF4667DAD2E7060@VI1PR0802MB2176.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 08/03/2016 10:36 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: > Hi, > The case has already been fixed by my unsigned improvement for scev/niter, and it can be vectorized successfully. This patch simply adds a test for it. > Test result checked on x86_64. Is it OK? > > Thanks, > bin > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > 2016-08-02 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com> > > PR tree-optimization/33707 > * gcc.dg/vect/pr33707.c: New test. OK. jeff
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr33707.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr33707.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b553142 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr33707.c @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */ + +int +foo (char *a, unsigned n) +{ + int i; + a[0] = 0; + for (i = 16; i < n; i++) + a[i] = a[i-16]; +} +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vectorized 1 loops" "vect" } } */