| Message ID | alpine.LNX.2.20.13.1607251916280.19688@monopod.intra.ispras.ru |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71494.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71494.c index f962f2c..cee407d 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71494.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71494.c @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ /* PR middle-end/71494 */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target label_values } */ int main () diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr16973.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr16973.c index e24c9f8..83274a1 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr16973.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr16973.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ to add back the label. */ /* { dg-options "" } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target label_values } */ void f (void)
Hi, I've applied the following patch as obvious to mark two more tests as taking addresses of labels (this cannot work on nvptx). The issue on pr16973.c was uncovered in the fallout of my (now reverted) toplevel-reorder patch; the other test, pr71494.c, fails regardless of that. 2016-07-25 Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71494.c: Require label_values. * gcc.dg/pr16973.c: Ditto.