From patchwork Mon Sep 20 14:46:24 2010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
X-Patchwork-Id: 65215
Return-Path: 
 <gcc-patches-return-273254-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1013AB6EF2
	for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;
	Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:46:34 +1000 (EST)
Received: (qmail 14927 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2010 14:46:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 14919 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2010 14:46:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL, BAYES_00,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from cantor.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by
	sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP;
	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:46:27 +0000
Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2])	(using
	TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No
	client certificate requested)	by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with
	ESMTP id E268893A00; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:46:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:46:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fix PR45706 (missing i?86-*-*)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTingYAsK+xxb-q_DeGhxQNEU02Mz0e3LtrRaiMfH@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009201645450.8655@wotan.suse.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009201612100.8655@wotan.suse.de>
	<AANLkTinh9T1QZg9kKRN5uQ=5FOEtXWUHOJCub9RET1ML@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTingYAsK+xxb-q_DeGhxQNEU02Mz0e3LtrRaiMfH@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:gcc-patches-unsubscribe-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

Hello,

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, H.J. Lu wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:38 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I forgot to add i?86-*-* to the targets that now can do some vector
> >> permutations resulting in mismatches between -m32 and native 32bit
> >> compilation (and testsuite fails).  I've checked in this obvious patch
> >> after H.J. confirmed that it doesn't cause further regressions.
> >>
> >
> > I missed
> >
> > gcc.dg/vect/pr43432.c
> >
> > This will fail on ia32 since it doesn't use -msse2.
> 
> This works for me on ia32 and Intel64.

Yes, I've checked in this as r164435.


Ciao,
Michael.

Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr43432.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr43432.c	(revision 164367)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr43432.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_float } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -ffast-math -fdump-tree-vect-details" } */
 
 
 void vector_fmul_reverse_c(float *dst, const float *src0, const float *src1,