From patchwork Mon Sep 20 14:14:23 2010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
X-Patchwork-Id: 65213
Return-Path: 
 <gcc-patches-return-273249-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2DE5B70D4
	for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;
	Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:14:33 +1000 (EST)
Received: (qmail 12161 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2010 14:14:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 12152 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Sep 2010 14:14:30 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL, BAYES_50,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from cantor2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by
	sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP;
	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:14:25 +0000
Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2])	by
	mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D8287567	for
	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:14:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:14:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Fix PR45706 (missing i?86-*-*)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009201612100.8655@wotan.suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:gcc-patches-unsubscribe-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

Hi,

I forgot to add i?86-*-* to the targets that now can do some vector 
permutations resulting in mismatches between -m32 and native 32bit 
compilation (and testsuite fails).  I've checked in this obvious patch 
after H.J. confirmed that it doesn't cause further regressions.


Ciao,
Michael.

Index: testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
===================================================================
--- testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp	(revision 164367)
+++ testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp	(working copy)
@@ -2426,6 +2426,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_vect_perm {
         set et_vect_perm_saved 0
         if { [istarget powerpc*-*-*]
              || [istarget spu-*-*]
+	     || [istarget i?86-*-*]
 	     || [istarget x86_64-*-*] } {
             set et_vect_perm_saved 1
         }