Message ID | 1284701436.2565.6.camel@dan |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:30:36 -0400 > Tiring doesn't begin to describe it. Formatting undamaged. :-) Thanks. > This was previously reported as a security issue due to leakage of > uninitialized stack memory. Jeff Mahoney pointed out that this is > incorrect since the copied data is from a union (rather than a struct). > Therefore, this patch is only under consideration for the sake of > correctness, and is not security relevant. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@gmail.com> > Acked-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:34:41PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com> > Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:30:36 -0400 > > > Tiring doesn't begin to describe it. Formatting undamaged. > > :-) Thanks. > > > This was previously reported as a security issue due to leakage of > > uninitialized stack memory. Jeff Mahoney pointed out that this is > > incorrect since the copied data is from a union (rather than a struct). > > Therefore, this patch is only under consideration for the sake of > > correctness, and is not security relevant. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@gmail.com> > > Acked-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> > > Applied. David, just for the record, as was already reported on the list, this fix is finally more a cleanup than a security fix because "tmp" is a union and not a struct, so tmp.addr == tmp.lval. Regards, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 08:36:02AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:34:41PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com> > > Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:30:36 -0400 > > > > > Tiring doesn't begin to describe it. Formatting undamaged. > > > > :-) Thanks. > > > > > This was previously reported as a security issue due to leakage of > > > uninitialized stack memory. Jeff Mahoney pointed out that this is > > > incorrect since the copied data is from a union (rather than a struct). > > > Therefore, this patch is only under consideration for the sake of > > > correctness, and is not security relevant. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@gmail.com> > > > Acked-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> > > > > Applied. > > David, just for the record, as was already reported on the list, this > fix is finally more a cleanup than a security fix because "tmp" is a > union and not a struct, so tmp.addr == tmp.lval. sorry, that was already explained in the commit message, next time I'll read it fully before replying :-( Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:36:02 +0200 > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:34:41PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com> >> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:30:36 -0400 >> >> > Tiring doesn't begin to describe it. Formatting undamaged. >> >> :-) Thanks. >> >> > This was previously reported as a security issue due to leakage of >> > uninitialized stack memory. Jeff Mahoney pointed out that this is >> > incorrect since the copied data is from a union (rather than a struct). >> > Therefore, this patch is only under consideration for the sake of >> > correctness, and is not security relevant. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@gmail.com> >> > Acked-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> >> >> Applied. > > David, just for the record, as was already reported on the list, this > fix is finally more a cleanup than a security fix because "tmp" is a > union and not a struct, so tmp.addr == tmp.lval. I can read, thanks :-) That's why I applied it to net-next-2.6 and not net-2.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--- linux-2.6.35.4.orig/drivers/net/tulip/de4x5.c 2010-08-26 19:47:12.000000000 -0400 +++ linux-2.6.35.4/drivers/net/tulip/de4x5.c 2010-09-14 21:26:52.499474207 -0400 @@ -5474,7 +5474,7 @@ de4x5_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, stru tmp.lval[6] = inl(DE4X5_STRR); j+=4; tmp.lval[7] = inl(DE4X5_SIGR); j+=4; ioc->len = j; - if (copy_to_user(ioc->data, tmp.addr, ioc->len)) return -EFAULT; + if (copy_to_user(ioc->data, tmp.lval, ioc->len)) return -EFAULT; break; #define DE4X5_DUMP 0x0f /* Dump the DE4X5 Status */